Bartleboom

DeRank : 35,89
DeAge™ : 7613 days • Here since 9 august 2005
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
"I wouldn’t behave the way you did at the beginning of the review." It’s probably because you don’t have an opposable thumb. However, I believe that a good orthopedic surgeon and excellent prosthetics can work miracles. In any case: what the hell do you know about it, since you’re not an editor? If we were in the same situation, we could have a conversation, but as it stands, you come across like the Pope talking about contraceptives.
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
It's true, Christ... You look like the psycho-Moscovite, in an illiterate version, without the chicks and without the 5,000 euro a month salary!
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
So, you think acting like a fool on a Metallica review is the same as shooting at a Red Cross? Oh my God, you have the dialectics of a manhole cover. I announce to you that for the next two minutes, I will keep my butt (very tightly) glued to the screen of my PC. Take advantage of it: just press your lips to the screen of your PC and the game will be made!
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
I don't give a damn about contacting you privately or about closing the discussion! And stop acting all polite; you've been bothering us for days with your childish comments on the reviews of Panico and the editorials. Back in the day, we’d go for weeks just mocking each other, and now after half an hour, I have to contact you in private? To say what? The same things I can tell you here? Come on, they’re not secrets, you know? And it's Saturday afternoon; people are bored, and if they don't want to read us, they can just not read and uncheck the box for "I want an email for every comment." So, don't come lecture me on how to behave or who insulted first.
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Oh my God, how boring you are... always the same things. So, let's repeat for the twenty-millionth time the same things. "Can't we similarly exclude the twentieth review of the same album?" No. It works like that on other sites. Here, no. On Debaser, everything gets published, as long as there's at least a bit of decent talk about the reviewed work. Even the thrushes know this by now. It's an incredibly silly question, especially since the mere fact that there are 20 reviews for an album seems fairly eloquent to me. But, evidently, the wooden heads need axes to understand. "I'm still convinced that it could very well be done like that." Good job, brainiac, it "could" be done. Do you think we haven't thought about it (better: they haven't - as in the creators of the site...)? And yet, NO. In the end, it was decided that things would stay as they are now (better: as they HAVE ALWAYS BEEN). "Surely the editors could avoid making silly comments on these reviews." No way! Why would they? I mean, not only do I have to work hard, but I also have to deprive myself of fun? By the way, what if I told you that I haven't edited in months? Or that I didn’t edit this review? Would I be authorized? I mean, I work my ass off, every now and then I get kicked in the butt and complaints, and on top of that, I can't even act like a fool as I wish. Who the hell do you think you are, the Master of The Wall?! "If you annoy an editor, you get banned." Wrong, idiot, because editors edit and do not ban. This has probably been repeated 500 times, but there's no way around it. By the way... "the editors"... as if we were 50. There are only THREE active ones (I, myself, would have edited 7 reviews since the beginning of the year) and they are all well-known figures on the site. So you're really just talking nonsense. Now, please, could you kiss my ass?!?
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
But I am the least helpful editor in the world; even the Stratovarius fans have figured that out! If you hadn't realized it yet, that's your problem. Or, possibly, your support teacher's. And you don't need to summarize the previous episodes with every comment: first you copy-paste my comments, then you paraphrase yours... This way we could go on until tonight. Instead, I repeat, just search the site well, and you will find all the answers you need. In short: Seek & Destroy!
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Ehhh?!? "no one invited you before"? "invite some people who care about you"? "Oedipal sex" (you looked that up on Wikipedia, admit it!)? What the hell are you talking about?!? And why do you keep dragging other people's mothers into this?! Are we in middle school? You asked a question: why do editors first publish a review and then start "throwing stones"?! I answered you: (kiss my ass and then) look carefully on the site and you will see that we have already answered that same question 20 million times. That's all folks!
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Come on, my invitation was nothing but that, not an insult. In fact, two invitations: 1) to kiss my ass; 2) to go read the 250 million responses to your question scattered across the site. Instead of rewriting my comments in full (which makes no sense), and dragging other people's mothers into it (which also makes no sense), do your best to accept at least one of my two invitations.
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Uncle Wolf, I messed up: of course it was "that I/we gave to the same question," damn sweetener...
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
@Nes: kiss my ass. And after you’ve kissed my ass, go read the two hundred fifty thousand billion responses that I/we have given to the same reply over the last 15 years. Damn, you’re worse than a review of The Dark Side of The Moon...