Bartleboom

DeRank : 35,89
DeAge™ : 7613 days • Here since 9 august 2005
Abadden Sentenced To Death
Voto:
Great question!!! If you only look at the number of comments at the bottom of each review, I would tell you - in order: 1) reviews of pro-government books where you can link to the reviewer; 2) reviews of albums by pop princesses like Lady Gaga where you can link to the reviewed artist; 3) hyper-dupes of historic albums where you can make some noise and spend a cheerful afternoon with friends. The moral of the story: review only what you like, what moves you, and don't give a damn if few people comment! :)
Abadden Sentenced To Death
Voto:
True. In fact, back then, we started rummaging through Grandma's trunk to review the "gems" of the genre: Deathrow, Sabbat, Assassin, Exumer... that kind of stuff, you know. However, it must be said that back then the thrash fans of Debaser were quite a lot more, so we could also review lesser-known albums/bands without the risk of finding the review with not even a single comment. Let's just say that, at the moment, things are a bit different. :)
Abadden Sentenced To Death
Voto:
A decent debut, especially since it seems to me that this approach is the most appropriate: if the genre practically died out 20 years ago, there must be a reason. If you like '80s thrash, take a look at the reviews by the user Francescobus. He and Ocram were dishing it out to everyone back in the day.
Sam Mendes Revolutionary Road
Voto:
At the time, I saw it in the cinema, but I admit I have a somewhat hazy memory of it: I'd say it was a decent film, although at certain points it becomes a bit too melodramatic, with excessively "heavy" dialogues and a screenplay that's a bit off. I seem to recall some rather interesting cinematography, but maybe I'm mistaken. I'd say it deserves a democristiano 3.
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
@Geenoo: while I was enjoying my well-deserved Ciocorì at the end of the day, I came across an old discussion from October 2008: Scream - Chris Cornell - Recensione di Cornell To be honest, I don't remember at all what I said back then (probably something not very intelligent...), but I do recall that even then we were debating the "nature" of the cases. I'm off. Have a nice evening!
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
I know, now you will respond with a comment like: "I claim my right and that of anyone else who frequents these pages to talk about whatever I want and participate in discussions that I deem worthy of my input without having to ask for your permission or anyone else's." And I will tell you: "Well, for heaven's sake, I wasn't trying to stop you from doing as you please... it was just an observation on my part. There's no need for you to get indignant!" :)
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
By the way, geenoo, you crack me up. Basically, 90% of your comments are split between: 1) being outraged by DeLorenzo's writings; 2) being outraged by some fake who has it in for you; 3) being outraged by some choice made by the staff (which, by the way, is always the same...). I really can't remember a single time when you participated in a music-related discussion... how did you even end up on this site?!?:)))
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
What legitimate questions! Geenoo, the Casi-HP issue is as old as time... and it has been analyzed/scrutinized/picked apart/dissected/subjected to every possible examination more times than I can count. Is it really necessary to keep repeating the SAME things to you? By the way, the presence in the literary cases is so "penalizing" that this review is collecting 10 times the number of comments compared to other reviews on the page... just to point that out...
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
The review is well written and the proposal got me really excited. Truly a nice suggestion! I'm not sure I understood what changes you needed, but this way it seems to work a bit better. :))
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
I can't remember which of my drunken friends with serious criminal records kept telling me that - in reality - these photos were photo montages and that the workers were just stand-ins. In reality, the Rockefeller Center, just like the Empire St. Bldg. and the other skyscraper-mega bridges built at the time, were mostly constructed by workers of Indian origin (in the sense of Native American, because they didn't suffer from vertigo).