Mr_Iko

Now I’M REALLY PISSED OFF!!! An anonymous person is a scoundrel who doesn’t want to be held accountable for what they communicate. The scoundrel feels relieved that they are not obliged to bear the responsibility for what they say. Would a masked man be tolerated if he stood up to give a speech to the people or wanted to speak in front of an assembly? Or would it even be acceptable for someone to start attacking others and covering them with insults without showing their face? Wouldn't they be kicked out soon enough with mighty boots? (Schopenhauer - The Art of Insulting). You anonymous pricks are getting on my nerves! You hiss from the shadows, cowardly and pitifully anonymous, and you don't have the courage to show yourselves, out of fear of appearing as horrendous as your intellect reveals you to be. Go back to your provincial hole. With the disappearance of anonymity, 95% of the problems caused by all these scoundrels would be eliminated. Shame on you. I will copy and paste this message against every anonymous message directed at me.

Nuno Bettencourt forever! I've had the legendary "number 2" for a lifetime... how much sweat and how much blood on that damn hard keyboard...

Clearly, they weren't a trash group. But metal, yes...

The Extreme weren't angry and only had songs that spoke of love and happiness.

Starting with expressing the disgust that Mollica provokes in me, I answer the question. I believe it is a great quality of the intellect to be able to govern one's emotions to such an extent that one can discern what is objective from what (should be) subjective. You say that I don't like Muse, but if you notice in both reviews, I assigned a "more than decent" three stars out of five. I tried to be as objective as possible (just don't ask me to be with Bowie, because I wouldn't succeed!) out of respect and love for music. By managing to describe even things that (you say) I don't like, I'm doing an important exercise for my intellect, and setting aside my tastes, I pay homage to the music, bowing with reverential fear. But are you really so sure that I don't like Muse? Because in this world, is there no one who understands that one must talk ABOUT ONE ALBUM AT A TIME? WHY DOES EVERYONE TEND TO GENERALIZE? I write that a band has made a horrible album (among four albums), and consequently, everyone infers that I am repulsed by that band. Conversely, I wrote that OK Computer by Radiohead is a masterpiece, and by divine force, I should be a Radiohead fanatic, which is absolutely not true, as besides OK and a bit of Kid A, they put me to sleep. I'm sorry, but you are not being fair.

The sequel isn't bad either. Not bad at all...

5 beautiful, well-deserved stars! The first time I listened to it, I thought: I can't believe it! I can't BELIEVE it! For this album, it's also advisable to use the "Still-Pause" button wisely to take an occasional refreshing break amidst the waterfalls of notes that flow abundantly and continuously from the speakers.

And then, excuse me, someone who idolizes the "Radioed" in a comment about the "Mius," given the mutual dislike between the fans of the two bands... Hmm?!?

Ugh, I’m tired of always hearing the same phrase: "I challenge you to write me spine-chilling songs like..."! So, only someone who can paint as well as Michelangelo can talk about the "Creation of Man"? Only someone who can write like Schopenhauer can discuss the "Art of Insulting"? To criticize "Judith and Holofernes," must I be able to sculpt like Donatello? Come on! This argument has no value; it's a last-ditch effort from a struggling team that doesn’t know how to defend itself against its opponents' attacks. If you really care about countering my impression (I also agree that it’s not absolute or divinely true), try to use convincing arguments and justify your ideas. Or at least give it a shot, PLEASE...

Typo. It happens, it shouldn't but... I like mistakes: they are what will later be commonly referred to as "experience."