NickGhostDrake

Ah, with good Matteo, the mornings had a completely different flavor...

A malefiko k-tie' to everyone (especially to me). By the way, it's been raining for 45 days and I've forgotten what color the sun is. k-tie' to the sun too, because what do I care, I've got the k-tie'. k-tie' to me, as I need to decide to buy an umbrella, and k-tie' to all of you who have forgotten what an umbrella is. I want to go to the sea. k-tie' to the sea too.

By the way, before3 accuses me of being a pseudo-nostalgic for the old Cure. I reread the review and it seems to me that I objected to the opposite: on this album there is nothing that makes me jump out of my seat precisely because it doesn't DARE, it doesn't change much, it doesn't move FORWARD. So it seems I said the opposite; I would have shouted masterpiece if Smith had put himself on the line, had dared. Ciauz!

I miss you, Matteo.

How old are you? 12?

wonderful, josi, I will have it. Even though I adore Tom Barman, and for me, he is God.

Emily, in addition to being a good writer (because anyone who writes is a writer themselves), is a delightful girl. I also take the opportunity to rate the album, which struck me as very good, even if it didn't make me go crazy. Borrowed from a friend. Maybe it's just because at the moment I have Joe Henry from morning till night, and I've fallen in love all over again.

But can you explain to me why every time someone disagrees with someone else, that person inevitably becomes gay?!? Cf.: "great DAMNED SPRING!!! finally someone who thinks like me... and what should I do? I've had it with these gays!!!" (before3)

You didn’t say a single word about why you don’t like the review. YOU TALKED ABOUT THE COMMENTS, not the review. I don’t seem to have wasted more than two lines on the producer. None on the label, but are you sure you actually read it? I’m responding this way only because you raised the stakes, that’s all; otherwise, I would have accepted your words just as they are. I never said that I don’t like anything, on the contrary, I adore many albums that I’m served DAILY, while you seem rather limited to me (CURE CURE CURE FOREVER, FUCK EVERYTHING, FUCK EVERYONE, ALWAYS AND ONLY MASTERPIECES EVEN BEFORE UNWRAPPING THE CD). You’re all the same, you fans with little money. I believe I traded the quality of the review honestly for an objectivity that mattered more to me. And I believe I was objective. Then, if you think that every CD from a band you adore must necessarily be a MASTERPIECE, take up horse racing. And there you go.

So, before3, I wrote the review, and I would be obliged to respond. But what could I possibly reply to you? In the end, you wrote a lot but said nothing. If the album doesn't blow my mind, is it my fault? Am I incompetent then? And what about objectivity? If you don’t like a Monster Magnet album and I think it’s genius, should I consider you incompetent just because our tastes don’t align? (tie')