odradek

Thank you, Stefanet. I've read all of yours, and I'm waiting for more (am I mistaken, or has it been a while since you last wrote?). I rarely commented (I was the gray Nobody), but I find them all to be exceptionally valid, both in the musical proposal and in the writing that presents it. So your appreciation is more than welcome. Bai

They said it all... thank you for the samples, I like them.

Pretazzo, in the gray box next to it is the tracklist...

It’s true, how beautiful! I also peeked a bit at the things from the 2nd and they seem interesting - But shouldn't the link to piaceri sconosciuti lead directly to the home page?

In short, I had to buy it...

Chilton was a nice guy. The glam aftertaste is there, but softened in a personal style and sound. This vinyl is among the many that I occasionally pull out, and I always find it fresh, full of little gems. A solid 4, abundant.

Damn, you put in the samples. - I'm going to shoot some rats at the dump, I haven't done it in ages. See you around. - P.S. I really have few ideas, but I like to see the pot stir. Bye.

Your responses on Side B, however, seem to overemphasize the doubts raised by the comments, taking them to the extreme. War is war, but I prefer to imagine this arena, not at all bloody, as a living room. War already affects me every day. I’m fed up with war. And since I’m not naive enough, I also have to imagine the coming apocalypse. Is "living room" too "bourgeois"? Choose some other place, but be kind, spare me the war. You know very well that the worst atrocities can be served with a blissful smile, even without the scream on the cover. I can’t picture you as the Wanna Marchi of Debaser. You are my sadistic and affectionate master. The tightrope walker who pretends to fall from the wire to increase the effect among those down below. And throw in some samples, please. - Samples Campaign 2006 -

Zurk, I asked him for a review on the Tuvini in the comments of another one of his reviews, just a few days ago. I don’t know if he already had it ready or if he came up with it on request. I thought it was the latter. That’s why I expressed my gratitude in my first post. And I still believe that that opening contains nothing but what I think I've described before: a small mechanism with a slightly delayed detonation. I too have always found Hitler's compassion for animals very curious. Paradoxical. Unacceptable. But, strangely enough, true. And it’s true that, not seeing in it an apology but rather a stratagem to observe the effects of the small short circuit generated, I cannot condemn it. Also because I continue to find a relevance with the construction always woven by similar, albeit less explosive, connective devices in his little pages.

Damn, we wrote together...