odradek

Dear Poletti, I see that you took it upon yourself to correct my post (which appears in the other review of the album, not present in the box like so many others because you avoided using the article before the name of the band). Look, it wasn't a mistake, I had intentionally written: Ah, i Bitels! - As for this page, which leaves me perplexed but neither outraged nor amused (any chatter about the Beatles can never end with definitive and widely acceptable decisions), I don’t understand the need to close after having used phrases genuinely posted by all those you cite, attributing the final profanity to Punisher, who apparently has never posted it like that in any review. Who knows....

Mhhh.. you know well that in reality you, like this, are perfectly capable. It’s me who could only mimic a spirit like yours, my dear Joan. My auditory canal will soon need assistance; we end up being clusters of prosthetics.. (And somehow the crashy Canadian we like comes back into play) Hi, Regular.

I take advantage of this, avoiding to write the same things and I endorse Hal.

@ nightwalker10: I believe that the matter is expressed quite clearly in the first three lines and a piece of the text, up there. This, rather than diminishing its scope, seems to contextualize it. In the author's intentions. And that is why the "review" begins that way. On the other hand, precisely because the context is different, we are discussing the music, carefully avoiding reference to a complexity of thought that I, personally, do not master. Impressions from listening to an album. Some information about the author and the "story" of the tracks. Many fragments in the form of samples to get an idea. That's all I can do. For the analysis of G.'s thought, I gladly listen to those who are sufficiently informed. Bai

Dear Georg, it seems to me that there is no difference of opinions between Alessandra and me. In truth, I have somewhat different impressions, however, regarding those who perceive it as obscure and gloomy, but these are impressions, perceptions, rather than opinions. Then, not having sufficient knowledge of G.'s works and theories, and having declared that my own approach is "emotional and instinctive" in executing his music, the ground for discussion about G.'s theories seems, as far as I'm concerned, rash. I read something, I believe, at least 15 years ago, and I haven't returned to the subject seriously since then. I will probably do so, despite a certain instinctive reluctance. I fear that even then, however, I wouldn’t attempt to deduce failures or successes from the impressions of some users on a website. I don’t know, it seems a bit... hasty, what do you think? - P.S. But don't you want to open up even a small window on the unknown reason for your nick? @ Hal: almost certain that if it finds a place in your collection, it will also find a way to captivate you when the time comes. On the other hand, you know that since my tastes are rather unreliable, I wouldn’t go this far with you if I weren’t practically sure.
Bye bye

Mhhh.. I believe that style is something different from extravagance or the attempt to "stand out." Pretazzo definitely has style, that's for sure. And I really like it a lot. However, it is obvious that everyone has their own tastes...

@ Qzerty: does the opera house in Bari often program, let's say, a bit unconventional events? - @ Jim, did no one catch your question or did they prefer to dodge it? :)

Sanjuro, sorry, but it's because of that "too much" that instead of a 5 (which seems to fit everything, just by virtue of the things you yourself say) you give it a 4? - A group of which I only remember the name. Regular makes a funny micro portrait...

Great and recommended is also the page you included in more info. Wanderer, once again congratulations.

But have you ever "felt" it to be so dark or shadowy, as some comments say? For me, on the other hand, the depth combined with the "singability" has delivered very "bright" listens...