odradek

Yes, Ghemison, I went right after reading the review. I like these kinds of things.

Supersoul is good. I used to like them, but I don't think I have this record anymore...

Primiballi, thank you very much for the certificate, but you're introducing a topic that doesn't seem relevant to me. The "popular" value of the work and its overall "weight," even contextualized to the period, will mean something in another context; if I highlight three names among my preferences, regarding the quality of the work on the text, I take the liberty to disregard other considerations: that was my very personal podium, related to that specific point. Not an overall assessment of the careers of the three. Next to the podium stand, in different episodes replacing one of the three, Conte and De Gregori (at least the first half of his career) - Babel, but what Modena City Rambles, let's not joke. Rather, if you get the chance, listen to the albums I pointed out to you, even though I imagine they will seem very distant (in terms of attitudes and sounds) from your usual listens.

Hey, 6+9=69, every now and then you park your side(space)car around here and come in for a shot of debaserite on the rocks... Still hanging out down there? All good? Have these guys even recorded any CDs?

Yes, you would be: if you knew how much I can be it :))

P.S. Nice your "oenological" comment. Perhaps the new also needs to "breathe"...

Uhm, cute, because he has talent. But less constant than this, more uneven in the quality of the pieces. If this was a 4, the last one was a 3 - 3.5, for me. Sylvian, have you ever heard of Thief? You might like them. The album is here: Simple File Sharing and Storage. (watch out for the spaces) And, even though it's less recent, maybe also The Beauty Room. If you're interested, I can upload their album too...

Much better this one than the new one, which after the very first listens, I haven't listened to again.

Poletti, you simply haven't understood anything. It’s not that serious; come to terms with it. The things you say about the film are strikingly banal and inconsistent. What you think you saw is another film; probably the little guide to cinema you have in your head lacks a sufficiently equipped decoder to provide you with a minimally adequate key to understanding the film. And the stories you babble about, you haven’t read them—stop talking nonsense. You can say: I didn’t understand the meaning, I’m bored, that night at the cinema my girlfriend didn’t want to make out, so I hate the film. But you can't attribute to Altman the childish intentions that are nothing more than your extremely limited way of looking at things. And speaking of little brains: mine, even on standby, despite its mediocrity, has all the time to interact with yours at maximum effort and meanwhile handle the mail. I read your reviews; I didn’t feel like expressing my opinion because I’m not interested in your way of trivializing things. But when you act all wise and shoot out stone-cold judgments on things you don’t understand, I feel I have the right to tell you. Especially about a film like America Oggi. So I promise I won’t speak to you again because what I had to say, I’ve already told you. Take care, little guide.

Babel, I hadn't seen your unpleasant reactions to others' comments. I didn't know you in this light. Whatever opinion the interlocutor expresses, you share yours in response without backing it up with any argument, labeling those who disagree with you as fools. What kind of behavior is that? And then you go on about the preservation of the Italian language? Well, you'd do better to preserve a modicum of decency in your interactions with others. Disappointed, I bid you farewell.