Pietro Minchiadura

The discussion about the genius of Battisti we had some time ago around Cicero. And I fundamentally agree now as I did then. It's right to first mention Amore e non Amore, which I still consider the first prog-rock album in Italy chronologically speaking, so many gay slaps to Iside who was being cheeky by telling lies: a patchy record? no no no. As for this, see the appropriate review of the mentioned record. It was ready a long time before, but it wasn't fully understood when it unfortunately came out at the same time as "Emozioni," paying the price of the comparison. My God no, it’s an enlightening piece. Vol. 4 is a commercial operation that includes some unreleased tracks on a 33 RPM record. Regarding the matter of the banality and non-banal nature of Battisti's songs, I refer to Cicero's consideration of Battisti's "bad luck." In America, with a different entourage, he would have been a genius of international caliber. Moreover, let's not forget, Lucio was a talented guitarist.

Wow! I found you! An incredibly detailed review made by a true fan! The album is the best of recent times: La ricreazione, Guatemala Guatemala, USA for Italy, Torre Annunziata, and Bagno Aurora are the highlights. It's full of joyful participation, especially in Guatemala Guatemala, where Pace, Savio, Cerruti, and Bigazzi all sing together exuberantly. Stunning cover art.

And now everyone set your farts on fire! Have a good evening! SEZZY I MISS U

BREVIARY OF THE YOUNG (AND DELICATE) ANTISINISTRORSO DOCG: "I reject wholeheartedly the left in all its forms, applied communism, Fassino, and Rosy Bindi. I express my dissent against the Manichean culture that holds that goodness resides in the left and evil in the right. I like red t-shirts, I even have the red descert of debaser, I listen to De Gregori and a lot of other Bolshevik stuff, I watch Pasolini, and I have tattooed lines from 'Salò or the 120 Days of Sodom.' I find quite a few communists fresh and vibrant, even though I don’t agree with a bit of their ideas, but that’s their problem: I’m right (and here we’ll throw in a smiley to show we care! ----> ;) <----). I claim not to always be on the side of the right, and to make it clear that not all ingredients can please me in the paella, I confirm: no to Berluska (or to any other character of choice among Vito, Bondi, Landolfi, Calderoli, Cè)."

Experience and ethics teach us that it is not possible to share every point of a doctrine in any cultural or social manifestation. So if you're on the right, it’s better to always give a little treat to these leftist conspiracy theorists. And say that Forza Italia is a bit crap, come on.

But above all, eh! To memory!

I was saying: every time you come here to insult, for goodness' sake! These editorials are leftist (by the way, I didn't like this last one much, but I think it's normal that occasionally something doesn't convince me, nothing striking), but they're not institutionally "offensive." Or rather: they don't affect site users to the point of justifying their insults towards the editors themselves. So forget about the anger and insults and fight as a true anti-leftist with delicacy and the tip of a foil. If they end up insulting you after you've expressed your opinion civilly, you certainly know you're on the right side. And I would say that’s what’s important. If you keep shouting, even while saying the right things, you won’t get anywhere. By the way, I agree with everything, though.

A BEAST! AND ANYWAY YOU'RE WORSE THAN THE POLLSTERS OF BERLUSKA! "the editors are center-left, some are Catholic-communists, others are reformist socialists"... TO HELL WITH IT!

BUT REALLY WONDERFUL! Alright, domeneddio, you are always the same old geezer, you know very well that I recognized you and that your style hasn’t changed: as some old ciollammano used to say, you’re quite the little troublemaker. The crux of the discussion lies pretty much in nickghostdrake's response about right/left editorials and it is: the site is leftist, tough shit for those who maintain it. It’s not anarchic, nor super partes, nor apolitical: it’s blatantly and stinking leftist, no doubt about it. Those who want can stay in, those who don’t can leave; what’s the point of getting all worked up if you’re preaching to the desert? It’s a bit like the business of the pornocomizi girotondini of Moretti and his pseudo-peaceful companions: would you go? I wouldn’t even go if I was paid. Better to go see La Russa and Gasparri. Or neither of them, but at least it's better to keep away from the red spaces if one believes they cannot build a valid discourse centered on dissent.

WOW! BUT THIS DISCUSSION IS AMAZING, GIVE ME A SECOND TO SPAM YOU LIKE CRAZY!