puntiniCAZpuntini

Legendary, look at those well-mannered metalheads, ahhh... l'amour...

Beautiful? BUT ISN'T IT A FLAGRANT PLAGIARISM OF THE ISIS?

You arrived late, Poddo; now the new protagonist of the Italian political scene is the mother of the anonymous.

Now I'm listening to One Of These Days I'm Going To Cut You Into Little Pieces. Hooray for technology, hooray for surround, hooray for Waters, hooray for the mother of the anonymous.

Think of me when I come inside your mother, thinking I’ll find interesting things and instead I only find "bullshit".

It's done on purpose, Grace, you're too far behind to understand, too far behind...

I have my ass where my face should be.

So what? Moonchild goes to beat dressed as Wonder Woman, Dylan Dog is a little fart compared to Moon.

Ah, the red star was invented in Russia, but the Zapatistas use it too, and he's doing it as a reference to Marcos. Moreover, there are stars and stars; most of the time the star you see on Zack and Morello isn't the communist star, but their logo star, that is, a rotated red star. The rotation signifies adherence to the underlying idea but with their own adjustments in thought. You see, you were wrong here too; if you don't know your enemy, you don't know where to hit them—missiles in the water. The star on the drum, on the flags, and various other stuff is theirs, but it has happened that he brought Zapato flags featuring the original star on stage, though those are rare cases.

How can I admire Che and not share his ideas? Simple: I admire his charisma, his courage, his desire to stand against what he didn’t like, his "stay-anti". At the same time, I think about his political ideas and I think: “dictatorship, disgusting, uselessness.” I read in your words an incredible extremism of thought; you can't separate a person into multiple sides. For instance, I really like Paolo di Canio, I admire him as a footballer, but his political ideas make me sick. Or, I don't know, I also admire Berlusconi for his cleverness and because he’s incredibly shrewd, so much so that he’s been such a bastard that he’s taken advantage of an entire nation, but that doesn’t mean I like having him in government. I don’t consider “a sworn enemy” a complete idiot just because he is my enemy; I evaluate him for what he is. I don’t side with him, but if he has a quality or something to admire, I’ll say it. Another thing is to evaluate a person in full; for example, I might admire a person for having 123456 qualities, but if they’re a pedophile, then I find them disgusting. I recognize their qualities, but if they have one single flaw that is so great it overshadows the qualities, then I don’t like them. It’s a sort of mathematical average, like school grades. An 8 in religious studies doesn’t save you from a zero in Math; some subjects are more important than others, but there’s no single subject.