puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,39
DeAge™ : 8249 days • Here since 21 october 2003
Korn Korn
Korn Korn
6 jul 05
Voto:
More than the 400 recs, HE had already reviewed this album. It's one thing to review an album that someone else has already reviewed, but reviewing the same album twice doesn’t seem very useful to me, especially considering it’s an album that has sold over a million copies and that we all know.
Michael Jackson Off The Wall
Voto:
"fifth essence of a dance album" this thing is bullshit from a tressette tournament at the senior center in the historic district, so 1 and 1, dry and well-deserved. Album-Summa of the genre, a summary of 10 years of Black Music... these are things that deserve a massive ONE, not just a simple one. I like the genre, and this record, which is crap, deserves a one.
Pink Floyd Echoes The Best Of
Voto:
I had read that the unreleased tracks were the three pieces from "1967 - First 3 Singles," but I’m not sure because I haven’t heard the EP "First 3 Singles." It would be really nice (both commercially and artistically) if they decided to create a badass digipack in super audio CD of the live performance at Pompeii. I had to record it quite roughly from the DVD to listen to it in the car. That would be a great thing, especially because "One Of These Days" etc. is quite different from the version on Meddle, featuring a Mason particularly eager for outbursts that makes me headbang like crazy. Overall, the interpretation of ASOSecrets is the best of the thousand done here and there.
Pink Floyd Echoes The Best Of
Voto:
The best of their Best Of is Relics; in my opinion, that's a must-have. Containing only similar material, it can be listened to seamlessly, giving you a great overview of the most innovative and seminal group in music history. They've truly extracted the best in this one, with a seriously impressive tracklist. In this, Echoes transitions from Learning To Fly to Arnold Lane—it's enough to get you arrested.
Pink Floyd Echoes The Best Of
Voto:
Useless review, considering that the first Best Of by Pink Floyd was made in 1970 and is called "The Best Of Pink Floyd" -> Ingrandisci questa immagine <- Subsequently, in 1971, not satisfied, they made another Best Of, called Relics, released in SIX VERSIONS and distributed worldwide, this is the cover of the first version -> Ingrandisci questa immagine <- Therefore, this review makes no sense and is pointless, since this is only the third Best Of by the Floyd; in fact, the first two were made even before they became HYPER-famous. Not to mention Delicate Sound Of Thunder and Pulse, as Lestat says. And you’re scandalized because they made a Best Of 20 years after the last decent album? And back in '70, with Ummagumma still fresh from release, when you heard about a Best Of coming out, what would you do? Jump off a bridge? Rating for this Best Of: 2, since "Relics" and "The Best Of" are truly Best Ofs not containing all the kiddie stuff that came out after Meddle, no pop just psychedelic sound.
U2 Rattle & Hum
Voto:
If this film is a masterpiece, what is Eva Henger's latest effort, "La Fotteria"? But who cares, I have a 25 cm cock.
U2 Rattle & Hum
Voto:
Ah well, if the Rolling Stones say it, the new 2000 of Music Gossip, then we can trust it...
Björk Medúlla
Voto:
un link <--- Here, if you donate a pound to charity, you can download the Where Is The Line remix by Fantomas. Bjork & Dave Lombardo... you got it? Donate a pound to charity, you bunch of jerks.
Carpathian Forest Black Shine Later
Voto:
It had been a while since anyone talked about True-Norwegian-Black-Metal...
Nick Cave And The Bad Seeds The Boatman's Call
Voto:
Certo! Inviami il testo e procederò con la traduzione.