puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8166 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
The best of their Best Of is Relics; in my opinion, that's a must-have. Containing only similar material, it can be listened to seamlessly, giving you a great overview of the most innovative and seminal group in music history. They've truly extracted the best in this one, with a seriously impressive tracklist. In this, Echoes transitions from Learning To Fly to Arnold Lane—it's enough to get you arrested.
Voto:
Useless review, considering that the first Best Of by Pink Floyd was made in 1970 and is called "The Best Of Pink Floyd" -> Ingrandisci questa immagine <- Subsequently, in 1971, not satisfied, they made another Best Of, called Relics, released in SIX VERSIONS and distributed worldwide, this is the cover of the first version -> Ingrandisci questa immagine <- Therefore, this review makes no sense and is pointless, since this is only the third Best Of by the Floyd; in fact, the first two were made even before they became HYPER-famous. Not to mention Delicate Sound Of Thunder and Pulse, as Lestat says. And you’re scandalized because they made a Best Of 20 years after the last decent album? And back in '70, with Ummagumma still fresh from release, when you heard about a Best Of coming out, what would you do? Jump off a bridge? Rating for this Best Of: 2, since "Relics" and "The Best Of" are truly Best Ofs not containing all the kiddie stuff that came out after Meddle, no pop just psychedelic sound.
Voto:
If this film is a masterpiece, what is Eva Henger's latest effort, "La Fotteria"? But who cares, I have a 25 cm cock.
Voto:
Ah well, if the Rolling Stones say it, the new 2000 of Music Gossip, then we can trust it...
Voto:
un link <--- Here, if you donate a pound to charity, you can download the Where Is The Line remix by Fantomas. Bjork & Dave Lombardo... you got it? Donate a pound to charity, you bunch of jerks.
Voto:
It had been a while since anyone talked about True-Norwegian-Black-Metal...
Voto:
Certo! Inviami il testo e procederò con la traduzione.
Voto:
Well, no thanks.
Voto:
Well, you see, in those cases there's no fun, the 14-year-olds respond with nonsensical things like "he's hot" or "he's the best" and it makes you want to give up. They’re so pitiful that it doesn’t even feel right to insult them. With Massimof and/or Vrensis, there’s enjoyment because we still stay on the topic of music; they’re still mature people and the insult or similar hits deeper. Meanwhile, the 14-year-old gets angry quickly, but after a nice chupa-chups or an episode of *Cento Vetrine*, it all blows over. They don’t fully grasp the point of the "f*** you"; it’s satisfying to insult someone who has an idea you consider crap, someone who listens to Cremonini has no ideas and therefore isn’t worthy of attention. Moreover, those who are firmly anchored in their beliefs get offended three times over (triple satisfaction). Then maybe, little by little, Massimof will listen to a record by The Heads and understand what it really means to assault a stratum while keeping the theme on rock and roll, and he’ll stop spouting nonsense, while a 14-year-old will move from listening to Cremonini to just tuning in to the radio—that's not a passion for music.
Voto:
And how can I think about avoiding my greatest amusement during the workday? Reading things like "Bruss breaks the eardrums with the strato" makes me laugh for entire minutes; reading people calling someone a fool has me laughing for half an hour... reading "and why were the old guys at Live 8?" really cracks me up. It’s all wonderful—when I log in from home, I disconnect after 3 seconds because there’s so much better to do, but during work, a “coglionazzo” here and a “pirlone” there, if deserved (like in this case where the merit is obvious), really improves my autocad.