puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7941 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Never said he received it by mistake, here we go again, you don't read and you spout nonsense. You know, there are people who, if they hate you, would rather send you to jail than scratch your car. If you live in Pufflandia, good for you.
Voto:
Thank you Strangler, it was nice as always.
Voto:
I like the Ramones because they made a revolution, the Dead Kennedys take that revolution (if we want, they improve it a bit) and so it’s like I’m listening to a Ramones record twice, also because I prefer the nonsense of the Ramones to the political commitment of the DK. The Stooges kicked off the sound and attitude of Punk, so it's not that I throw them into the Post77 mix, I place them at the top of the whole scene, untouchable.
Voto:
This is the first sensible thing you've said in a year of De-Baser, you know? It’s perfectly consistent with your character: you don’t know a damn thing, and therefore you've never reviewed a damn thing. This time I’ll give it to you, your post makes sense.
Voto:
Good job Ajeje, great question. No, I don't like Paranoid; I like Hand Of Doom, I like In To The Void, I like Lord Of This World, I like Nativity In Black... Paranoid is a bit monotonous, but I have to say it’s from ‘70, so it can't be lumped into the "all the same" category because back then there was nothing similar. Children Of The Grave? Same deal, Paranoid weighed down, there you go.
Voto:
Sure, even the Dead Kennedys. Stooges, Ramones, Sex Pistols (well, one album) are the only ones of that kind of punk that I like. Then if you bring up the influences like S. Youth or Minutemen, I like those too, but that’s already moving away from what I find monotonous. The DKs, on the other hand, I find monotonous; they just don’t sit well with me.
Voto:
Ah ok, then I’ll review a film set in New York talking about Baddimanna Filigheddu and Via Munizione Vecchia. And then one shouldn’t call you Idiota? But how can you resist calling you an imbecile?
Voto:
Yes, I say that Punk sucks to me as a simplification of Rock. You say: "In the punk scene, YOU CANNOT judge the value of a work based on musical technique." And that is absolutely right. In fact, I’m not saying that CCCP or any other band makes bad punk records, or that certain works are trash in the punk realm. I just don’t like it: the punk scene, because as you say, the "tum-pa" sounds monotonous to me, and the Riffs sound monotonous too. My rejection of the genre itself is like your rejection of reggae. I simply don’t conceive it as a genre but only as a simplification of Rock or poorly executed rock. But it's undoubtedly a matter of taste. Just as reggae is a simplification of the early ska, punk is a simplification or monotony (does that exist?) of rock, and I don’t like it because it’s simple, catchy, and easy-listening. And also because many representatives of punk have names like CCCP and make records with Mao's face on them.
Voto:
To unhinge I meant you say "beautiful, very beautiful" and I convince you to say "poo, very poopy." On the contrary, as you explain it often works, but that's due to ignorance (in the sense that you ignore certain groups, not that you don't know what you're talking about), not musical beliefs. I like Sonic Youth quite a lot... punk remains poop. And I don't think you'll unhinge me, just as I won't unhinge you from CCCP.
Voto:
Well, why does someone say that Burzum was a good musician... and you respond that "In punk, YOU CAN'T judge the value of a work based on musical technique." But when did I say that? Where? I never said it nor will I ever say it; I just said that in the fucking Aryan Black Metal I save a few compositions by Burzum... and then you twist this statement saying that I judge punk based on musical technique? What does punk have to do with Burzum?