puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7941 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Yeah, he probably went to Texas with his drug-laden lawyer, but I bet my ass on the line and my hands in a fire that they took a tenth of that stuff, because even an elephant couldn't handle those doses. It's totally exaggerated, so surreal as you say. Make up your mind, either it's surreal or it's true, it can't be both. So: surreal or true?
Voto:
Take Faso, for example; he made an album where he cuts and pastes songs, changing their meaning. Like, he transforms Battito Animale into Battito Anale, using the same voice of Raf. It was a joke, and he released it for free online... and I laughed. If I had bought it, I wouldn't have laughed.
Voto:
It's not that criminal, quite the opposite, but let me say that I don't like being taken for a ride when I buy a product, whether it's musical or not. I don't like it when Patton & Zorn do it, whom I love to bits, just imagine how I feel when a guy named Lindo does it. Eh. Try to understand us a little, come on...
Voto:
Yes, I understand, and I don't like it. But at least admit that the effect of the drugs described here is not at all truthful but only cinematic.
Voto:
So, do you see that it’s surreal? I’m not saying it’s a bad surreal film; I’m saying it’s bad PRECISELY BECAUSE it’s surreal. If Depp or Del Toro had actually dealt with that stuff, they would’ve been wiped out. So it’s surreal, as you say, which means I don’t like the surreal, and I don’t like this film.
Voto:
Yes, I know. Too bad that in this film they don't talk about taking five acids, or even ten. They talk about mixing every possible drug in very strong doses, you know? You don’t know, trust me, it’s not humanly possible to ingest all that stuff without experiencing effects similar to an epileptic seizure. We’re not just talking about acids—I'll give you that—but here we’re talking about a hit 200 times more powerful.
Voto:
Guevo, we’re not talking about cinema, nor Thompson, nor Gillian; we’re talking about the relationship between this film and reality; it’s something different.
Voto:
...is the effect of drugs truthful? And you tell me that if I don't know these things, I HAVE TO GO WATCH MOVIES? But haven't you watched too many movies, Guevo? Gillian may know their effects, but the fact remains that she portrayed them in a fairy-tale style, or cinematic style, but still not in a truthful way. They don’t sweat, they don’t twitch, they think complete thoughts even if they’re nonsensical, they don’t make 90,000 useless gestures, they don’t have moments where they stop to catch their breath, they don’t have moments (or if we want to say minutes) where they stop to stare blankly at nothing... come on Guevo, it's a movie that doesn’t reflect reality. Of course, it might be enjoyable, but to say it's truthful is a stretch. You have no idea what a massive intake of drugs can provoke in a person if you claim that portrayal is accurate; with just a quarter of what they take, 90% of humans would end up in a confused state, lying on the ground with tremors throughout their body, and their eyes would be rolling around for at least 8 hours. It’s a fairy tale, not a truthful film.
Voto:
It's not arrogance, do I happen to sign as "the whole world"? Or "the sense of common taste"? I sign with my nickname, I think they suck, and I say they suck; it doesn't seem like arrogance to me, just a judgment.
Voto:
Oh, I would like to emphasize that I distinctly separate the left from the far left, okay? My God, I don’t know if I would buy a record with the olive tree on the cover; I wouldn’t appreciate such an explicit reference. But one remains at a decent level of intelligence, and everyone thinks as they wish. However, it wouldn't give me the enormous sense of disgust that "CCCP-Fedeli alla linea Musica Folk Emiliana Punk Filosovietico" does. There, the idea of "everyone thinks as they wish" doesn’t exist. A world where we are all the same is an inconceivable absolute bullshit that robs us of freedom and the desire to live.