puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8095 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Then this record was PERFECT for the purpose, way more than a punk. They talk shit about punk, I give it a hand. They were angry, I added a raw style to it. This is my favorite review, I have to send it to Fariselli :))))).
Voto:
It's not about shitting on a record like mp does; the beauty of his recs is that he shits on an entire genre (read them again), and I actually like that he speaks his mind. I shit on this whole genre so much that I don't have the guts to look at a punk record among the ones I've reviewed. I prefer Golia Bianca over the Dead Kennedys.
Voto:
But what do you want to talk about? It's all the same, fast-paced rhythm, one-flavor riffs, and a loud voice. Its flaw is that it doesn't have many flaws because it's so simple that, lacking structure, it can't have defects. And then there will be 200 identical punk CDs; I can't tell one band from another except for the singer, does that seem like little to you? And don't tell me "it's the same in metal" because it's not true; every guitarist and every drummer has a very unique sound, I recognize Dimebag's guitar after three seconds. Anyway, what's the difference between this review and that of MP aside from the musical style? Do you think the implicit meaning is different? Answer directly, don't give me perfect answers that don't take a stance, tell me if there's a difference with a "yes" and explain what it is, or with a "no, the implicit meaning is the same." Don't sidestep, just go for it :D
Voto:
Massimof, tell me what good fruits punk has borne. In the '70s, Creedence, Yes, Genesis topped the charts, then punk came in, everything simplified, and from the '80s onwards, crap hit the charts. You complain about today's scene too, so please name the good fruits you’re talking about, one by one. :)
Voto:
Massimof, you respond too about what the difference is between this and a recap of Maledetta Primavera, aside from the writing style. To me, the meaning of both is the same, and they both deserve to be written. The ones from MP are my favorites because they say exactly what they think, even though I don’t agree with them even if they shot me.
Voto:
Massimof, in the rec I wrote that I think the music sucks, and THEN they ALSO (you're right, I should have included also) suck too. I don't want to say that I judge how a singer wears their hair, I like Frank Zappa, have you ever seen how he went around? :)
Voto:
One of the albums I've listened to the most in my life, but check the discography carefully, there's a mistake.
Voto:
Well, if you click on the link, the message isn't exactly implicit, right? :D
Voto:
I want to create my own little Punk corner like Easy's, I saw that he has a lot of fun with the tech kids and I was jealous. Then I was about to review a punk one but didn’t have the guts, so I chose this instead. It's not my fault Demetrio was angry, it's not my fault they were really pissed off, I couldn't do an idyllic review of this record, it wouldn't reflect the vibe of the album. Oh, I agree with them, punk isn’t music, it can be liked, but it’s not music, it’s just rock dumbed down by stupid kids. And those who only listen to punk aren't appreciating music but crap. What’s this? MP can do it because he tells jokes and I can't? Huh? Answer me this, ajeje, why can we trash Deicide, who are still a music band, but we can’t trash punk? No no, extreme metal is much more musical than millions of punk records made by morons, useless, hyper kids. It's not music, I don’t know what it is but it’s not music. Then everything about it gets on my nerves, their philosophy, their way of dressing, their leading figures, to me there’s nothing redeemable about this sub-genre of music. What’s the difference between this review and one by MP? Just the writing style, the meaning is the same. I like MP's reviews because he expresses his opinion and he’s right to do so, I express mine and I’m equally right. Or not?
Voto:
AH! look at yourself Baby Snakes, there are parts where he only has pupils and you can’t see the iris in the interviews, more high than this you can't get.