puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7993 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
You sound like a metalhead friend of mine who used to say that RATM were a terrible band and that Pantera were better. This might be an awful crossover album, but it’s a stunning piece of electronic industrial ambient music. If you don’t like it, that’s fine, but to tear it apart you need knowledge that you don’t have.
Voto:
On what basis do you define unmixed sounds? Why do you find the duration excessive? Do you hate having a few more songs to listen to? Recycled rap is clearly an utter nonsense, so I won’t even ask you where you came up with that. Recycled techno is also nonsense, given that there are more Neu!-Faust here than anything else. You might dislike Reznor's vocal setting, and since it's always the same, I can understand you. The rest are just statements dictated by taste; your sheer ignorance is evident in your definition of genres: If this is crossover, then I'm Gianni Minà. Not labeling it "ambient" is a horrifying symptom of ignorance. It's not boredom: it's ambient. If you don’t like ambient, just say "ambient is a crappy genre," and that’s where it ends; this album is perfect. Oh, and then answer my initial questions, because even though I know it by heart, maybe I missed something.
Voto:
It's not a record, it's a Live. I'll write unpleasantly but you have comprehension issues; do you really think you'll find twenty minutes of solos between Pat & Jaco in a Mitchell record? And I guess you're a fool, but whatever... your mom appreciates you too.
Voto:
Why is it rectangular?
Voto:
The poor Cobain ended up taking his own life because he wasn't helped; he suffered from depression and everyone knew it, but depression brought in money for Geffen and company, so not helping Cobain was convenient. I truly think he is a victim of the business; commercial operation? No, it feels more like commercial murder. His music doesn’t say a damn thing to me, but there's really nothing to say about him: he was a thousand percent consistent with what he claimed to be; there wasn't a single fake thing about him.
Voto:
So, you get pissed off too when you read bullshit, good. I didn't even read the whole review, just a few lines here and there, but the "drugged" point made me laugh because it doesn’t make any sense since all musicians do drugs. The total nonsense of suicide=commercial operation had me in stitches... this is an immense stream of bullshit one after the other, and I just wanted to see if I could get you to vent a bit against a reviewer like I do when I read what I consider nonsense. You see how instinctive it is? I wanted to point it out to the reviewer without telling him, and by defending him I made you say it. Well done, bullshit needs to be punished. Welcome to the dark side. :)))
Voto:
"And also about the practice of using the pretext of an album that is hardly mentioned, to express haphazard judgments about a group, an individual, and to engage in bar sociology." This is debaser, and I don't understand what is so offensive about this review: it is indeed offensive, yes, as you say in the part I copied, you are completely right but... there are about three hundred others that are much more offensive. Your point is very valid, but I don’t get it on debaser.
Voto:
I don't want to deny the fact that there are nonsense written here, I just want to point out that what seems like nonsense to you, for him it isn't. Just like I think "sprinstin everest of rock n roll" is one of the biggest nonsense written here along with "real rock was born in the 80s" and some gems from Vrensis. "Nonsense" is a very relative term. I was responding to your ""Your approval is just a clear attempt to swim against the tide that went very wrong."". It's not a clear attempt to swim against the tide; for me, there’s no nonsense written here. Except for one, which is huge, but I'm tired of contesting this bullshit phrase "After Nirvana, music is practically dead." Music isn't dead, nor will it ever die.
Voto:
So if it's complex and articulated, articulate it and explain it to us. It's not that you first say "show him respect," then say "I'm not God to tell you why to show him respect," and then tell me "it's a complex discussion." I understood perfectly well but I don't agree; however, you never explain yourself. Okay, it's a very complex discussion, but you started this very complex discussion, so I don't understand why you initiate a conversation that you don't want to carry on. That's why I said those things to you, because from a review of a damn album you managed to reach a much more complex discussion, which has no reason to be discussed here, as you rightly say in the end. I just wanted to point out that the topic of respect for death was out of place, that's all, since I didn't start it.
Voto:
So since you can't judge, just shut up. First you ask for respect, then you say you can't judge... I don't follow you, I don't see the logical connections between taking a firm defensive stance like you did and at the same time saying that the situation is unjudgable. Massimof, I'm not even responding to you, but I invite everyone to read the review where you say that Sprinstin is the Everest of rock n roll and his band is a war machine... then you even have the nerve to say that this is just bullshit.