puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7983 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
The problem lies entirely with John Hudson, the last Faith No More album is ultimately Angel Dust, King For A Day (Tirato?) is an album by Mr. Bungle (it's all written by Patton & Trey) and this is a kind of crafted summary of FNM.
Voto:
The heaviest of their discography, an immense masterpiece, but I tend to prefer those where they went all out with Moog Mellotron and various electronic effects.
Voto:
Beautiful, but it doesn't grab me like the others, it's the one I listen to the least of theirs. In the end, there’s so much Soul-Rap-Groovy out there, it’s not really an essential album, beautiful nonetheless, but it has too much competition to be called a masterpiece; the best comes later, when they found something new and original.
Gorilla S/T
6 sep 05
Voto:
For the Baby Ruth I’ll ask the Experts, I’ll let you know. As for the meeting, if Cathedral comes to Italy I will definitely go; otherwise, the date in Switzerland isn’t bad either, but that’s certain, while the Italian date is still being organized. Then there’s always that huge possibility called Electric Wizard in Milan... but I have more faith in Cathedral.
Voto:
Well, there are a thousand much better ones. For example, Alicia Keys sends it straight from Corporacion Dermkoestetica to Melissa.
Gorilla S/T
5 sep 05
Voto:
Yes, I agree. That's exactly why I say it's difficult to venture into the lesser-known past; you read the names but can't find information, reviews, or anything else that helps you understand if it's worth the hassle to go all out to find it (since in the end, the time you spend might be worth more than the €10 for the record). You might spend two hours jumping from one mail order to another, then the record arrives and you don’t like it, or you say "damn, it's super seminal"... but you feel it "has aged poorly." On the other hand, with revivals, you find 90 reviews complete with ratings, information, listenable samples, and so on. With this, I don't want to say "long live the revival," but just "the revival also has its positive aspects." ;-)
Voto:
Eeehhh now you cling to the rules of galactic classification, come on, that Growl fits badly on their riffs anyway. The Monkeys pound three times harder, they're quite different from the Zillas. What I don't like is the contrast between Riff-Attitude and the way of singing. The Monkeys are pretty much all about metal like everything else, the Zillas create songs that start with background laughter, the sound of a bong, the super-crazy riff and... bam! Evil and devastating Growl, it doesn't fit, no no no. The Monkeys are all dark, nasty, evil and stinky, the Growl suits them.
Gorilla S/T
5 sep 05
Voto:
The thing is, the old groups are hard to catch, they were already unknown back then, let alone now. There are a thousand names like Iron Claw, Iron Maiden (no, not those Metal ones), Zior, Arzachel... that I’d like to discover well, but it’s all out of print stuff, or downloads or you can just forget about it, and those who neither have the desire nor the possibility to download can only buy the Revival that you can find in all online cd-stores. Little by little, they are reissuing a lot of old stuff, but before we have all the 70s Hard Rock available on cd, it will take another 20 years.
Voto:
A cornerstone, yet it isn’t as willingly listened to as other cornerstones of the era. It is a cornerstone because they dared to push boundaries and went beyond everything that was circulating at the time, but the fact remains that it isn’t appreciated as much. There aren’t well-defined ideas, just a grand idea of doing "something extreme," five out of five for its immense historical value, but I’ve never bought into it, and it’s unlikely I will in the future: there’s too much delirium relative to the substance, which is always there, but there’s really too much delirium. Perhaps, after a careful remastering done seriously, I would reevaluate everything, but as it stands, it comes off like Psycho says, a "mess," making it difficult to fully appreciate something you can’t quite define. However, it’s from 1967, and you can’t expect it to sound perfect = 5/5.
Voto:
No, HC Melodic = Ramones Style Made in California = Zero respect. I don’t think the Ramones made songs in Growl; they also had a lot of melody, so the copying is the same, therefore zero respect. :)