puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7936 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Well, exactly. There is no inventor, there is no definition of "genre." But I never wrote "so-and-so invented it" or "psychedelia is." I only said that this album is the most psychedelic by the Floyd and one of the most psychedelic of the 60s, and it's terrifying in how beautiful it is. I didn’t mention either an inventor or a definition, you started with "Sgt. Pepper & Casino," eh :)
Voto:
I haven't heard them well yet, I can only say that Denison is cool because of Tomahawk.
Voto:
Bah, the debut of the 13th Floor is a year before Sgt. Pepper. Red Crayola, the same year as Sgt. Pepper, which is the same year as Piper. There isn't an inventor, but if there must be one, surely the Beatle is the least credited, especially since Sgt. Pepper has a minimal vein, but minimal, compared to an Interstellar Overdrive-Astronomy Domine. Or do you have a really simple, easy-listening idea of psychedelia, like that of Dark Side Of The Moon, psychedelia for kindergarten and/or nursing homes. // Dad, I'm missing the Live Anthology, I'm looking for it now, Floyd live is always money well spent, even Waters’ with O'Connor isn't bad, obviously it's not magnificent but it's worth every bit of €10 :D
Voto:
Bah, the first one is less experimental, less psychically violent, less avant-garde. At the same time, the first one is more melodic, more structured, better sung. They are two different records, hardly comparable, and they have created two different currents. The only thing is that the current of the first one has died down a bit, while the experimental and extreme current of the second one is still active. The fact remains that 2, it doesn’t stand anywhere, it’s nonsense. You give it a 5, and then say "I don’t like it because," but 5 is the minimum rating.
Voto:
Lucy, but if you don’t know the album, how can you say for sure that it’s a good review? It talks about an album that is practically more Metal than anything else: bad, angry, hallucinatory, incredibly violent. He talks about it as if it were a Dead Can Dance album: this review is complete crap. If it were a DCD album, it would be beautiful, but with this album, it has absolutely nothing to do. It couldn’t be more wrong.
Voto:
2? Yes, yes, this is now the comedy review of De-Baser.
Voto:
This review is starting to be a nice summary of monumental bullshit.
Voto:
Exactly, I was talking about the playground.
Voto:
Nothing, it doesn't grab me. I'm aligning myself with the Lukin party: Listened to in loop all morning, well done, well crafted, well produced but not crazy enough for my tastes. It flows nicely but doesn't scratch much.
Voto:
Greg, go play in the sand.