puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8094 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
21 sep 05
Voto:
Yes, but he was talking about Revolver and then brought up Penny Lane, which came a year and a half later; he wasn’t talking about Pepper. Pepper is fine, but it’s from ’67, the year when 187,000 psychedelic records were released. It's not that Pepper doesn’t have a psychedelic streak, but there’s a difference between “a streak” or “an ending” and Are You Experienced, Red Crayola, all that stuff. Revolver is from ’66, specifically August, released after the 13th Floor, and Revolver has a slight hint of "strong" psychedelia, it’s very soft, too soft to hold up against the others, psychedelia for my grandmother. Which doesn’t mean “crap,” it just means it’s different stuff: softer, things that today can’t be considered psychedelic; just because in ’66-’67 it was kind of strange, doesn’t mean it’s still viewed that way. Take Penny Lane as an example: Psychedelia for my grandmother—if Penny Lane is psychedelic in 2005, then I’m Gigi Sammarchi. Come on, nowadays Penny Lane is an ordinary song; the title track of this album was and remains psychedelic to the bone. That’s why I say this created a current that still lives on today; the psychedelia of the Beatles and "Bike" faded quickly, it can’t compete with 15-minute trips made up of 900 overdubbed sounds that shred your brain, with obsessive drum patterns, distorted bass lines, and guitar distortions galore.
David Axelrod Songs Of Experience
David Axelrod Songs Of Experience
21 sep 05
Voto:
The cover and title are pretty Hendrix :D. I've never come across one of his albums, but he gets mentioned often; let's see if I can find something.
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
21 sep 05
Voto:
Yes, psychedelia for my grandma. The Beatles are huge, but come on, psychedelia for my grandma. Great songs, great music, immense... but psychedelia for my grandma.
The Rolling Stones A Bigger Bang
The Rolling Stones A Bigger Bang
21 sep 05
Voto:
This review is a container of galactic nonsense, truly one of the finest from De-B. But aren't you ashamed?
No Doubt Tragic Kingdom
No Doubt Tragic Kingdom
21 sep 05
Voto:
BUT you have your insecurities, Birobiro has written more reviews than you, of a genre that you don’t even know because you listen to trash, don’t worry we know that Bironiro has a little flaw called No Doubt, while you are a flaw with two legs and two arms.
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
21 sep 05
Voto:
Well, exactly. There is no inventor, there is no definition of "genre." But I never wrote "so-and-so invented it" or "psychedelia is." I only said that this album is the most psychedelic by the Floyd and one of the most psychedelic of the 60s, and it's terrifying in how beautiful it is. I didn’t mention either an inventor or a definition, you started with "Sgt. Pepper & Casino," eh :)
Jesus Lizard Liar
Jesus Lizard Liar
21 sep 05
Voto:
I haven't heard them well yet, I can only say that Denison is cool because of Tomahawk.
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
21 sep 05
Voto:
Bah, the debut of the 13th Floor is a year before Sgt. Pepper. Red Crayola, the same year as Sgt. Pepper, which is the same year as Piper. There isn't an inventor, but if there must be one, surely the Beatle is the least credited, especially since Sgt. Pepper has a minimal vein, but minimal, compared to an Interstellar Overdrive-Astronomy Domine. Or do you have a really simple, easy-listening idea of psychedelia, like that of Dark Side Of The Moon, psychedelia for kindergarten and/or nursing homes. // Dad, I'm missing the Live Anthology, I'm looking for it now, Floyd live is always money well spent, even Waters’ with O'Connor isn't bad, obviously it's not magnificent but it's worth every bit of €10 :D
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
Pink Floyd A Saucerful Of Secrets
20 sep 05
Voto:
Bah, the first one is less experimental, less psychically violent, less avant-garde. At the same time, the first one is more melodic, more structured, better sung. They are two different records, hardly comparable, and they have created two different currents. The only thing is that the current of the first one has died down a bit, while the experimental and extreme current of the second one is still active. The fact remains that 2, it doesn’t stand anywhere, it’s nonsense. You give it a 5, and then say "I don’t like it because," but 5 is the minimum rating.
Neurosis Enemy Of The Sun
Neurosis Enemy Of The Sun
20 sep 05
Voto:
Lucy, but if you don’t know the album, how can you say for sure that it’s a good review? It talks about an album that is practically more Metal than anything else: bad, angry, hallucinatory, incredibly violent. He talks about it as if it were a Dead Can Dance album: this review is complete crap. If it were a DCD album, it would be beautiful, but with this album, it has absolutely nothing to do. It couldn’t be more wrong.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7482

dominus_sathanas

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

_Teskyo_

DeRank™: 0,00

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

Badi

DeAge 7246

Workhorse

DeRank™: 6,75

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione