puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7927 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Massimof, there are no "ifs" or "buts," it says movement, not group. Then the fact that "we are trying to de-box" I didn’t understand, the review practically doesn’t talk about anything else, what more should I do, an 80-page analysis describing and dismantling the aforementioned "genre" group by group? Then you didn’t answer my question. Of the 4 groups from the radio, every time you write something, you confirm it more and more for me; how am I supposed to finish it if it’s the truth?
Voto:
You see, we understand the term revival differently; for me, "a literal imitation of '60s bands" is crap, not revival ;-) In fact, it's a bit too much mental gymnastics; I should stick more to the definitions in the dictionary. Anyway, check out "Ufo" by "Guru Guru" and "Dawn" by "Eloy"; those tracks, in my opinion, are ones that Jason & Pete have probably listened to well.
Voto:
Do you see Aeneas? "When in Rome, do as the Romans do," as we wanted to demonstrate: in Berlin, strawberry is very cool, while Rod Stewart is too out. Maybe in Plato's cave, if you're good, I'll put you the Giubbocs.
Voto:
You really didn't understand a thing about the review. First of all, it should be noted that I talked about Movement and not about groups. In a single movement, there can even be 200 groups. Name me one purely '80s movement that stands out. Glam rock? (Beautiful, right?) Or Synth Pop? (Fabulous, I would say). What movements do you think managed to survive from the '80s? Second, this is a rarities & B-sides, I don't know any posthumous album that deserves a high rating since they are nothing but compilations. Third point: the goal of the review was precisely the "decassettizzazione" of the so-called "shoegazing" genre, but you are still stuck with your 4 radio groups, these are discussions too advanced for you, you are too ignorant to grasp the references.
Voto:
Your consideration has a flaw: you haven't analyzed the inconsistency of the fact that Lemon & Chocolate, despite one being Fruity and the other Creamy, match perfectly. The difference is that in a cup they don't quite work because with a scoop you pick them one by one, while with the powerful slurp, you get the flavor derived from the union. And, although derivative, it remains very original. Plus, with the maya veil, you can wipe off any drips from the sides of your mouth. Everything is useful, if you think about it a bit. In Plato's cave, you could put in tables, so you can also serve glass cups with various little umbrellas with waiters and maître chocolatiers from Lindt. Think caramelized, live excellence.
Voto:
Even in the latest works, I find a sense of revival, albeit mixed. Initially, they were definitely traceable to the 60s movement, but as time went on, they blended so many different elements that they became difficult to categorize. However, with a bit of effort, the references are always there. I find the Kraut sound precisely in their latest works: a complete abandonment of riffs and a rediscovery of guitar reverbs and synthesized sounds that are so beloved by various Ash Ra Tempel, Amon Düül in their second period, and Popol Vuh in the more concrete parts. I also hear a lot of Eloy (except for the vocals) and the distortions of Guru Guru. All things considered, you’re absolutely right because blending 40 “old” styles and creating a new one isn’t truly revival. Still, I’m particular, and by deconstructing them piece by piece, I can still find a reference. However, it’s worth noting that we have a different conception of revival: for me, those who make hyper-definable revival are pure garbage, like Interpol, while those who mix 700 things like the protagonists of this review do create revival, and thank goodness for that. In short, for me, it is far from a demerit to create this type of music.
Voto:
The evident proofs are too singer-songwriter, and very little pissi-pissi. The obvious is out, the ethereal is very cool. Some vote for Heroin, and some vote for White Rabbit. I definitely vote for White Rabbit. The explicit can be funny at times, but far less intriguing.
Voto:
The only problem is that it doesn't open them in a second window, I need to find a solution :D
Voto:
Come on, it was obvious, you’re too used to the lyrics of Italian singer-songwriters, you need a good dose of Anglo-Saxon double entendre.
Voto:
If it were Fugazi, you wouldn’t say that. Or would you?