puntiniCAZpuntini

Beautiful, but they must have remastered it at least twice: I have a version I bought recently with a transparent case, and I got it from Media World, not ordered from some rare collectibles website, so forget about being laughed at. A friend of mine has an older one from the late 80s with a black shoulder, and I don’t know where he bought it, but I don’t think anyone laughed at him either. Anyway, great review, but the record is available everywhere, just to not discourage those who want to look for it.

To me, who doesn't like REM (and that says a lot), I like this. 5. And this is undoubtedly the best review of REM on the site.

Yeah, yeah, all very nice, but like all newcomers, you give little weight to words and speak in absolutes. My point is that saying "the best live performer existing" is nonsense; they might be talented, but it doesn’t matter. Another point of my argument is: the terms used in this review are completely off; it sounds like a review from Gods Of Metal or Road Burn: ""war machine, ear-splitting layer, I don't know what distortions""... they don't mean a thing. A death metal band is a war machine, a rock band, by virtue of being rock, does rock, it’s not a war machine. Being a site for global reviews, the right terms need to be used for each genre. And the distortions, come on, it’s rock, not acid psych; an acid psych band uses distortions, not someone who does rock like Bruss. Therefore, your argument, although valid, has nothing to do with mine. There’s always a tendency here to bring everything to the absolute discourse of "best-worst" and to make statements like "there's no better than all", which are discussions that have neither beginning nor end, and are useless and far too subjective. I was only contesting the fact that, indeed, this review speaks in absolutes that have nothing to do with Bruss. If you like it, tough luck for you, but I wasn’t disputing his talent; I think he’s terrible, but that’s not the point—“terrible” is a matter of taste, pointless to discuss. However, the terms used here don’t mean a thing, and I stand by that.

Mom, how mean you are today. There’s just one thing I don’t understand: YOU, on a site that talks about music, what are you doing here?

Of course, Strangler, you really have a talent for coming up with nonsense: the copy-paste joke really made me laugh heartily, thank you very much. I bow and leave space for your fabulous reviews.

I'm sorry, but I was referring to that handsome big guy, Strangly.

Oh my, you're getting more and more wicked, you know I like you like this: ignorant, a jerk, spouting nonsense without a basis, and bold. The more you go on, the more you turn me on.

So: I like Betty Davis, I write a review in which I describe her with "Menacing, Nightmare, Electric Storms, Punk Attitude," a very violent album, etc. and that's fine. Because what matters is that I like it. I thought it was necessary to give an idea of what was in the album, this is a Doom review, and the album is too Doom, right?

You tell him Strangler, give him the links to copy-paste. I don't have the courage.

Damn, Turkish is a Czech tennis player.