puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7923 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Love, I know this album by heart, I have the original, and I repeat that you are getting confused. On "In Search Of" (the one after this, but for you they were already dead) there are two bursts of synthesized sounds in 2 songs. Subsequently, they picked up a couple of very, very, very light sounds on Eatin Dust (3 albums after this), and STOP. You are confusing albums, you are confusing albums, you are firing confusion on a loop. Maybe you mean that in the last track of the album there are two sounds during the solo... but they are not keyboards, and there are two sounds, in 10 seconds of a song. You don’t even know what you’re talking about, just stop it.
Voto:
You're confusing the group. The Manchu don't have keyboards. You've heard something else and for six days you've been talking nonsense. Fu Manchu play raw hard rock, no keyboards, no similarities with Rush, no.
Voto:
I have them somewhere, but I can't remember the music. The cover is memorable because the guy looks just like Morrison. But I didn't get the parentheses. Does it work like "Black (Sabbath)"? :D
Voto:
Even in the early '90s they did some great things. Depending on how one evaluates self-recycling, of course, since the last "new" thing they came out with was in the mid-'70s. However, from this point on, they "save" one every 3-4. But it must be said that they always manage to bring out one every year, better than a team of specialized workers.
Voto:
Strangely, for the umpteenth time I notice that either you don’t read, or you don’t know how to read. Who mentioned the Rush? Do you actually read the comments? I was talking about the Manchu, do you read the comments? The Manchu do not have keyboards, I never said that the Rush didn’t have them. I’ll repeat again, reread the discussion from the beginning, you lose the thread very easily... and you make all these arguments on your own. You start with a concept that you claim to have read (but it’s not there) and you respond to this concept that you think someone exposed = what are you talking about? Read the comments, it’s always the same old story, I’ve been repeating this to you for over a year now: do you even read the comments? What are you talking about? Come on, change your tune because you’re boring.
Voto:
Absolute masterpiece of Italian Black Music. When it was released, the entire scene bowed down, restoring the throne to Milan that had been usurped the year before by Bologna. Nationally epochal without exaggeration, 4 is really too little for an album that has influenced bands from Trentino to Sicily.
Voto:
Me too, very much. A brief and essential live. I agree with the reviewer on the "ranking" of the Soft albums.
Voto:
Love, I speak, you have your own conversations, inventing things supposedly said by others. You did it here too; I talked about the foundations of the discourse, and you transcribed it, omitting and changing the meaning. If you followed a logical thread in the discussion and talked about music without spouting unbelievable nonsense like Keyboards in Fu Manchu, comparing them to the fathers of progressive metal, it would even be entertaining to read you. But like this, what do you want me to say? The same thing as always: either you're confusing the album, or you’re not reading carefully, or you're messing around, and I hope for you it’s the last option. Or just pass me the Fu Manchu with the keyboards, since you’re the only one who’s heard them.
Voto:
I said that talking about the Heads was more interesting. :D
Voto:
Your friend is cool. Give him my compliments.