puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8164 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
And secondly, I do not judge based on the opinions of others, but I have judged from the phrases you wrote that are reflected in the comments of others. Are you with me? Can I continue? Ok, I'll give it a shot: so in reality, even though I haven't read your reviews, I've read the most important phrases, aka the gist of the discussion, so the evaluation is still based on your writings, even if they are not placed in the tagged html of the reviews but in the untagged html of the comments. Got it? You wrote it, others reported it, I read what you wrote as reported by others. Besides the fact that knowing well the albums you rated poorly, a low score for 100th Windows would be enough (which does not mean that it is sufficient, see above) to make me understand that in that review, there are a mountain of nonsense or mental gymnastics without practical grounding. The evening classes also include a deeper exploration of this concept, which is much more complex than the examples, I realize.
Voto:
"You are capable," does not mean "you have done," but it means "you are capable." Got it? Capable, not done, capable. They are called "examples," and an extreme example helps to understand the concept. It helps, but it's not a magic wand; in fact, you haven't understood it. Even repetitions help: "you are capable," does not mean "you have done," but it means "you are capable." If you want, there are also evening repetitions.
Voto:
Come on, it’s perfect: it said a lot with little, I didn’t hear it but I understood what’s inside. It didn’t say a word more... and it did well. Who gives a damn about knowing the producer’s name and what guitar the singer uses? For that, the entire web is available. If someone doesn’t know Mogwai, or GYBE or Sigur Ros, then they just don’t get it... but they can go to de.ricerca and read about Mogwai, Sigur Ros, and GYBE, then come back here and understand. Or they can go make a sandwich. Meanwhile, a lot more people commented here compared to the current average... there must be a reason, right? The pappardella records are commented on by two people.
Voto:
<<<When someone says "poop," everyone knows what it means>>> But if they say it while pointing at a gas pump, nobody understands, and they reply: Look, it's a gas pump; you do poop in the bathroom. <<<What I like is evident from everything I DON'T LIKE>>> What a bunch of crap: there are about, what, 2-3 million records out there? You tell me you hate 20 records, and I’m supposed to figure out which among the remaining millions you like and which ones you’re about to review? Give me a break. <<<When I criticize a record, I don’t just say "poop," but I usually explain WHAT I don’t like and WHY>>> Oh well, yes, you’re capable of giving a two to John Coltrane because he doesn’t make you dance, and a two to Metallica because there’s no sax, but please, you come up with enormously idiotic reasons, that is clear. Anyway, I’ve never read your reviews; I figured you were an idiot from the comments and the phrases reported by others. So there’s little to re-read, and nothing to read; I don’t care much for your nonsense about super famous records, I’ve already listened to them and I already have my opinion, and I couldn't care less about yours.
Voto:
Spitting shit on records without saying what you actually like is just pointless bullshit: you don’t provide a point of reference; for all I know, you could be that guy who combines 40 printers and makes them print at different times, and the noise they produce is music to him. Saying "poop poop poop" doesn’t mean a damn thing, which is the same as saying: you're a massive idiot, you make chickens laugh. It makes sense to say "this is better than that" (even if not in the same review; if you give one a 5 and another a 2, the point is made), saying "poop poop poop" is childish nonsense. So tell us what the hell you like, at least we can have a laugh.
Voto:
You can find pride DVDs online, even on Amazon, and also used for a few bucks. Otherwise, they usually sell them at serious Martial Arts gyms like Jeet-Kune-Do or Sambo or Wing-Tsun. Of course, if you buy them at the gym, you'll pay more.
Voto:
No thanks, I still don't dream of keyboards on records and I don't associate King Crimson with Green Day, I'm still at a decent level of memory. When I confuse the Stooges with Agitation Free, then I'll call you for a little massage. Long live the keyboardist of Fu-Manchu, great friend of the saxophonist of Cannibal Corpse, cousin of the trumpeter of the Sex Pistols. Hail Hail Satan, the Sabbath comes in town.
Voto:
Love, I know this album by heart, I have the original, and I repeat that you are getting confused. On "In Search Of" (the one after this, but for you they were already dead) there are two bursts of synthesized sounds in 2 songs. Subsequently, they picked up a couple of very, very, very light sounds on Eatin Dust (3 albums after this), and STOP. You are confusing albums, you are confusing albums, you are firing confusion on a loop. Maybe you mean that in the last track of the album there are two sounds during the solo... but they are not keyboards, and there are two sounds, in 10 seconds of a song. You don’t even know what you’re talking about, just stop it.
Voto:
You're confusing the group. The Manchu don't have keyboards. You've heard something else and for six days you've been talking nonsense. Fu Manchu play raw hard rock, no keyboards, no similarities with Rush, no.
Voto:
I have them somewhere, but I can't remember the music. The cover is memorable because the guy looks just like Morrison. But I didn't get the parentheses. Does it work like "Black (Sabbath)"? :D