puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8164 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
The considerations on the Loop are a matter of personal taste for me. I can’t stand Battisti either, but that doesn’t mean he’s an idiot; it just means I can’t stand him to the umpteenth degree for personal reasons, just like I can’t stand Battiato, or I get really irritated by Guccini. Just like the total and celestial classical melody makes me want to vomit to the max—too much melody for my taste and way too little vibe—it weighs down my nuts by hundreds of tons, but that doesn’t mean it’s crap; it just doesn’t appeal to me. Just like the Ramones, whom I respect because they were the first to think of a direct and essential approach to music, I still can’t stand them because I don’t like that direct approach, but I respect them (the ones that came after, obviously not, they’re just crap). The same goes for Kraftwerk; I feel bad about the excess of Loop, with songs that are too long based on the variations—if they were half as long they’d be better. But that doesn’t mean it’s crap, it just doesn’t align with my taste like Neu! does.
Voto:
But I've also told you that I keep saying it's beautiful, I haven't changed my mind, it’s beautiful. Even Trent Reznor is getting on my nerves now, and I heard With Teeth in passing at the store, I’m not buying anything from him anymore, but I still have the original discography, it's beautiful. He's an asshole, he gets on my nerves, but the beautiful records remain beautiful. You insist on the point, but I haven't changed my mind about the music, only about the sympathy. A hot girl, if you get to know her and she's a bitch, you say "she may be hot, but she's a bitch," but she still remains hot. Anyway, in 120 posts, you still haven't explained your point. This crap deserves a 4 when it's just a rough draft of the stuff that was going around in mass at that time in that same city?
Voto:
So what you said earlier means nothing to me, since for me this is the case too. Your words backfire on you; where I come from, we call it... getting tangled up. And why does one get tangled up? Because they are wrong.
Voto:
...anadda mc's loose his liifeee toooniiiight... ùòòòò... and recommend soul to jesuuus chriiiiisssttt... whyyyy...
Voto:
<<< Apart from the unfortunate remark about Schulze's description, your reasoning is perilous. And let me explain why: because you are >> Aeneas. << There’s little to be done. You are >> Aeneas, << and we know how you are. When someone or something you >> like comes along, the grand descriptions and lofty words come pouring out << we know it. I don't think I've ever seen cases where you say "Masterpiece >> A fantastic flush << with a solid 5/5 to back it up...>>
Voto:
Ah! So you've changed your mind! First you give him a 5 and then you write << Schulze was born with the sound of the flush and will die with the sound of the flush, period. >> and now you throw back in the mix a nice << Do you realize? How can I believe you now? How can I trust your words? Nothing will ever be the same again. >>
Voto:
Jacob, I just explained the reason for the teasing; I neither defended nor glorified anyone, nor did I say that someone is better than another: I just teased poor Rivulsconi, afflicted by the plague of plagiarizers. I am not objective at all; I am fully biased in favor of free teasing towards anyone I consider a complete idiot, and I must say that Rivulsconi has all the credentials to win the title this year. I never said anyone is skilled; I just said that Rivulsconi seems like a big clown to me. And then, according to you, what the hell do I know about what people do in private? Do you think I have a crystal ball that tells me what users do privately? Sure, I have a webcam aimed at Moonchild's gay bar, and I enjoy all his Lap-Dance performances every Wednesday at 11:30 PM with a plate of spaghetti with mussels, a liter of beer, and free burps, but other than that, I can't know what the hell people say in private. Besides the tiny detail, just a tiny one, eh... that I couldn't care less about. I'm sorry to disappoint you, but among my idols, there are only porn stars and drug dealers, no users from this site. And don’t take it the wrong way, Francis, for what I’ve written here; he’s obviously also in the running for the award since he holds the 2004 title.
Voto:
Do you remember Berlusconi when he plays the victim? Damn… EXACTLY!
Voto:
No no, you misunderstood. HE made an ENTIRE PAGE on his blog titled "Not welcome around here" where he just spewed a bunch of bullshit about people stealing his reviews just to show off here and there, stuff that had me laughing for twenty minutes straight. The lynching happened because, after reading that wall of crap (Oh, AN ENTIRE PAGE), you can't help but make fun of him. Now, I don't remember where I found the link, but if you happen to visit Rivo's blog, look for the page "not welcome around here," it will lift your spirits for the whole weekend, then come back here and make fun of him too.
Voto:
But you, have you read that wall of bullshit titled "not welcome around here"? One thing is to say "you plagiarized," another is to raise a wall of nonsense. And then "everyone, and I mean everyone," means 1200 users; here we are 4, and I mean 4, so we're still missing 1196, and I mean 1196. Huh. Besides the fact that it's funny to mess with someone who gets so angry that they build a wall of bullshit like on that unwanted page. Truly hilarious, and it invites mockery. It's normal; there's no fun in messing with someone who doesn't get mad.