puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7915 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
Yes, but you keep changing the subject, Teesorinoo. I've asked you some questions above. Answer me. I'll repeat them for your convenience: since this is a writing meant for a reply, how can it be judged as "inviolable"? Besides the fact that, when I was asked questions about my thoughts even by those who think differently from me (see easy), it didn't seem to me that I replied with "hey, I'm right," but I simply explained my thoughts better regarding this topic. So, where is it "inviolable"? Explain it to me. Another question: where have I written what is rock and what isn't? I wrote, for example, that I "don't see Pink Floyd as rock"; I didn't say that they objectively aren't, adding that I BELIEVE Psychedelia is a word that fits better. So, where are the clear judgments you speak of? Where? To me, they all seem like opinions; if you read objective judgments, please highlight them for me.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
No Love, it makes no sense. Anyone who believes they can give objective judgments is just a zealot. The only objective things in the world are the physical and mathematical laws that have practical verification. Your opinions are always subjective; there is no subjectively objective opinion: it's a contradiction. And I repeat that I'm not complaining about your critique because it doesn't affect me at all. You criticize those who complain, but I haven’t complained. You criticize those who make indisputable judgments, but I haven’t made any nor will I ever. So, you haven't critiqued anything about my writing... what should I respond to? I just don't get it.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
I have already argued in reviews and comments, Amore. These are reviews on de-baser that do not deal with modern music. I have a limit of 30 lines to adhere to, so what I provided is a list of examples. The fact remains that you have given an objective judgment on this album, not me, you. And the fact remains that it is you who is complaining, not me. Therefore, I don’t see what I should defend myself against, since your accusations, being caused by a misunderstanding... do not affect me.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
<<< And I (out of necessity) "subjectively" tell you that "objectively" it’s funny >>> This sentence doesn’t make sense, that’s why I’m telling you there’s some issue, bro.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
And finally, the standard of judgment: sorry, but the review is signed by me. It’s not signed on behalf of the "world collective of great truths." That is my thought, made with my own standard of judgment. How could I possibly write and use someone else’s standard of judgment? Don’t you realize that it’s a contradiction? Whose standard of judgment were you hoping for, that of the Holy Madonna special guest The Angels in Column? Please explain to me because my indisputable standard of judgment can’t grasp it. Besides the fact that, since I wrote something hoping it would be commented on, the word "indisputable" is complete nonsense. I stated my opinion precisely to discuss my point of view, so it is the exact opposite of "indisputable," right? If I wanted it to be "indisputable," I would have written it on a blog without the possibility of a reply, wouldn’t you agree? I look forward to your responses, I’m always keen on comedy.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
Ah, the artists I included are just examples. You know, it's a bit difficult to fit all the deserving artists in music history into 30 lines. Besides, lists are pretty boring. If you want a list, go to the land registry; here, at most we throw out discussion prompts. If you find the prompt incomplete, then complete it yourself. It seems pretty obvious to say that we're missing artists: of course we are, but so what?
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
13 feb 06
Voto:
Teesorinoo, look, you've misunderstood: what I said was neither a complaint nor a judgment, but the complete opposite. The point of all this is that there's nothing to complain about. But above all, you're the one passing judgments, since you use the horrible word "objectively." There is nothing objective about this. If you really believe what you're saying is objective, in my opinion, you have serious mental issues. If you took this as a complaint when, in fact, it’s the opposite, I think you have serious mental problems. And that doesn’t mean that you objectively have them, because there’s nothing objective at all; however, in my opinion, you’ve got a big problem, bro.
Devin Townsend Ocean machine: Biomech
Devin Townsend Ocean machine: Biomech
12 feb 06
Voto:
Even if something makes a bit of sense, even if it's far-fetched, I wrote it: the one about the Muff, I really didn't get it.
Devin Townsend Ocean machine: Biomech
Devin Townsend Ocean machine: Biomech
12 feb 06
Voto:
It's not at all a constructive criticism; it's just a hassle-for-the-sake-of-it.
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
Kayo Dot Dowsing Anemone With Copper Tongue
12 feb 06
Voto:
Don't worry, the vote on the record is right :D
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7303

gianmarco86

DeRank™: 0,00

ZiOn

DeRank™: 25,46

Badi

DeAge 7067

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

Hal

DeRank™: 9,08

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione