puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7969 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Ah, one last thing: just say you haven't listened to this album. First you threw out the score but... allow me to doubt. It came out 22 days ago, you tell me it belongs to a "subculture"... so how come you've already listened to it and stored it away enough to rate it a solid and confident 3? Come on, nothing's going to happen, just say it: "hey, you've made me mad and I wanted to trash the album," that's understandable. If you have listened to it, let's talk about it, why do you give it a 3? What's wrong with it?
Voto:
No Amorinooo, you insist on misinterpreting my writing. I never wrote "it stopped," I wrote "it said everything," meaning 60/70 as a style, not a date. There's a big difference. In terms of rock records, real rock "hell yeah," I have as many from the 60s-70s as from the 90s-2000s and I keep buying them. Look at Sparzanza, look at Earthride, look at Hellacopters, etc. I understand that I didn't lay everything out plainly in the review, but the fact that it needs to be interpreted doesn't mean what's written is what you derive from it. Go ahead, you misunderstood. And there are no innovative bands of that kind; I can have a bust of Matt Pike in my room and an equestrian statue of Brant Bjork in my garden, but that doesn't make them innovative figures. Fabulous musicians, yes, but innovative, no. Since I've already written 70 reviews on de-baser, I don't think I need to explain what I listen to every time; I've written it millions of times, so I can take that for granted. In light of this, read everything again, and then we can go have a snack together, right?
Voto:
Fugazi, I'm in, that was a small revolution. They more or less reinterpreted old things, but there’s definitely a different approach to the instruments, with the rhythm section taking more of the spotlight than the guitar. But damn, 15 years ago. The conversation with Teesorinoo went beyond the guidelines I wanted to set; I wanted to talk more or less about now. I’m in and I'm not in with shoegazer; it's a revolution for sure, but come on, it's "sophisticated stuff." It's neither raw nor sweaty nor direct nor groovy, and it doesn't make you scream "Hell Yeah Rock N Roll!" I mean, Scaruffi likes it, and that says it all. I like it a lot too, damn if I do, but I feel it’s more of a direct descendant from Kraut & Floyd rather than from that angry 60s garage. It took something from that too, of course, but still, the final result is quite different. But Fugazi & co fits in perfectly. I like it little, but it fits.
Voto:
If you don’t like it, fine, nothing to say, but as a piece of advice: read the other one. If you take de-baser as "every little page is a personal wank," you lose sight of the bigger picture. It’s pointless to repeat things that have already been written, pointless to review the same album 800 times. Who they are, what they’re called, and where they come from had already been written by wwwhatermoornet; I preferred to talk about their place in the current progressive music scene, namely: definitely among the top players. Otherwise, it’s just repeating the same concepts over and over, and that’s so tiresome. It’s better to compose a mosaic each time. Then, hey, do as you like.
Voto:
Aut.Min.Ric. brother...
Voto:
There are many. That's precisely why it's impossible to organize a general consultation for each rec. Besides the fact that so many people = so many tastes = it's hard to find common ground. I can't be any less, considering that the recs are numerous. It's an incredible vicious circle that culminates in the rhetorical question you find everywhere on de-b: "ma chisseneicula?". That question isn't written randomly; it carries tons of rhetoric written in the comments from number 1 to number 6000 and something. These are cosmic mechanisms larger than us, so join the "chisseneincula corporation," the stocks are always on the rise, you have a 1.5% stake and money always available. Cool, right?
Zu Igneo
13 feb 06
Voto:
One of the most esteemed groups by John Zorn.
Voto:
Antmo, do you have any idea how long it would take to select? We receive an average of 13 reviews a day; if we have to consult on the publishing for each review, they would be published a month later, and there would be a backlog of 800 reviews in the queue. But you know how tedious it is to consult for every rec? I would dare to say: minchia che due coglioni. The selection happens jungle-style; if it's crap, just put one or don't comment, and sooner or later the guy will leave. If you like it, you say it’s beautiful and the guy is encouraged to continue. It doesn’t matter if you are Leona or Gazzella, just put one and move on.
Voto:
I'm not the investigator of the site, try asking "Pietro Minchiadura," he chose to uncover double identities as a second occupation. I can only tell you that there's Strangler, not Stinger, who has been in love with me for a long time and we always kiss with so much love. But maybe he's a fake too, I don't know. Yeah, this is definitely a job for Pietro Minchiadura.
Voto:
I believe so, Alex: they are truly some heavy bricks. If you go to the official website, I think there are some Samples. I’m not very sure, but if I remember correctly, you can listen to something from the first album. Otherwise, search for "Maudlin Of The Well" on De-Baser; that's the old lineup, and there are some Samples there.