puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7915 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
If you don’t like it, fine, nothing to say, but as a piece of advice: read the other one. If you take de-baser as "every little page is a personal wank," you lose sight of the bigger picture. It’s pointless to repeat things that have already been written, pointless to review the same album 800 times. Who they are, what they’re called, and where they come from had already been written by wwwhatermoornet; I preferred to talk about their place in the current progressive music scene, namely: definitely among the top players. Otherwise, it’s just repeating the same concepts over and over, and that’s so tiresome. It’s better to compose a mosaic each time. Then, hey, do as you like.
Voto:
Aut.Min.Ric. brother...
Voto:
There are many. That's precisely why it's impossible to organize a general consultation for each rec. Besides the fact that so many people = so many tastes = it's hard to find common ground. I can't be any less, considering that the recs are numerous. It's an incredible vicious circle that culminates in the rhetorical question you find everywhere on de-b: "ma chisseneicula?". That question isn't written randomly; it carries tons of rhetoric written in the comments from number 1 to number 6000 and something. These are cosmic mechanisms larger than us, so join the "chisseneincula corporation," the stocks are always on the rise, you have a 1.5% stake and money always available. Cool, right?
Zu Igneo
13 feb 06
Voto:
One of the most esteemed groups by John Zorn.
Voto:
Antmo, do you have any idea how long it would take to select? We receive an average of 13 reviews a day; if we have to consult on the publishing for each review, they would be published a month later, and there would be a backlog of 800 reviews in the queue. But you know how tedious it is to consult for every rec? I would dare to say: minchia che due coglioni. The selection happens jungle-style; if it's crap, just put one or don't comment, and sooner or later the guy will leave. If you like it, you say it’s beautiful and the guy is encouraged to continue. It doesn’t matter if you are Leona or Gazzella, just put one and move on.
Voto:
I'm not the investigator of the site, try asking "Pietro Minchiadura," he chose to uncover double identities as a second occupation. I can only tell you that there's Strangler, not Stinger, who has been in love with me for a long time and we always kiss with so much love. But maybe he's a fake too, I don't know. Yeah, this is definitely a job for Pietro Minchiadura.
Voto:
I believe so, Alex: they are truly some heavy bricks. If you go to the official website, I think there are some Samples. I’m not very sure, but if I remember correctly, you can listen to something from the first album. Otherwise, search for "Maudlin Of The Well" on De-Baser; that's the old lineup, and there are some Samples there.
Voto:
These sound hyper-progressive, hipster, highly technical, melodic Zorn style. Like a Masada but with 800 instruments, plus technological inserts in the mixing. Exactly super fancy and complicated.
Voto:
<<< I have a broad concept of rock, as it should be >>> Good, but I was making a different point. I have a broad concept of MUSIC. Not everything that is modern music is Rock; how can you say that Portishead is Rock? I call it Modern Music, or simply music. There’s rock and all its sub-genres, there’s electronic music and all its derivations, there’s Jazz and all its derivations. These are things I've already written about, no need to repeat, just read again. You may have every reason in the world, but you’re making a completely different argument from mine. I’m the first to say that modern music is alive and kicking, but if you want to call everything "rock," good for you. However, if you want to have a discussion, let’s first try to understand the point of the conversation and then we can talk. Talking about all modern music doesn’t appeal to me; it’s too much of a galactic ramble, too long, a discussion that has been done 800 times.
Voto:
Ah, I almost forgot: Back In Black... innovative? Back In Black definitely falls into the category I have in mind, absolutely. But come on, calling Back In Black innovative seems like a galactic stretch to me. What could possibly be innovative about Back In Black compared to the early AC/DC? They even hired a replacement singer trying to find the voice that was closest to the previous one... recycling doesn't get more extreme than that. It's beautiful, eh, a masterpiece, but innovative? Not at all, come on.