puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7969 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Thank you Josi_, you bring me comfort.
Voto:
Yes Mike, I believe psychedelia is still very much alive and kicking. Oneida is a perfect example. Also check out Acid Mothers Temple or 35007.
Voto:
But I can also use it as a coaster with the name rock, the important thing is to understand each other. If instead of discussing a concept you argue about the fact that the name "concept" doesn't please you but you prefer "little thought," I don't know what to tell you. For me, you can call it Gianfranco too. <<< It’s crystal clear that Gianfranco said it all. Grazialcaz. >>> Okay, I'm fine with that.
Voto:
Darling, you also wrote that """bullshit""", look: <<< It's crystal clear that rock from the 60s/70s has said it all. Grazialcaz. >>> You wrote that, didn't you? You're clinging to the definition of a name. You've already told me you share the concept, so for me, the discussion is long over. But not for you; you’re hung up on the names I've been repeating to you for 90 posts: call them whatever you want, the concept remains the same, and it’s nothing extraordinary, just the discovery of fire that I used to talk about this album. An album you haven't even listened to, and you keep talking to me about names and names, but who cares about the names, bro.
Voto:
And likewise the grandchildren, because grandchildren are not just grandchildren, but are evolutions of your son. And since it’s normal for things to evolve, it’s equally normal to call them by the same name since in the end they are always the same thing. So no more son & grandson, but all son. And when you have to remember the birthdays, it will be a tough time.
Voto:
Following your "in summary" logic, I should think this about you: when you have to decide on a name for your son, do you think you'll manage it in time for his wedding? And if you have three, what will you do? Maybe if they're all boys, will you just call them all "son"? Or will you number them chronologically, son 1-2-3? Because since a son is always a son, and it’s not like if one is born later he’s different, but he’s always a son, you always have to call him son. Then who cares if nobody understands a damn thing at home, the important thing is that the son is called son, and the cousin is cousin. How’s that for a summary, is it alright?
Voto:
Your "in summary" are the most ridiculous interpretations I've ever read of a comment. I really hope you're having fun writing such crap, because you give me the impression of being mentally challenged if you can't extract a single concept from 200 posts but take every sentence as a unique and sole concept. Do you know the word "discourse"? When you were a kid, did your mom hit you so much that you never thought about the blue phone?
Voto:
You feel terrible. Music is called music, and rock is called rock. I wrote that WHAT YOU MEAN BY ROCK 80, meaning those names you posted above, I call by their genre/movement, but those who continue to make rock, I call rock. The Fuzztones, for example: Rock, in the 80s, rock. You're hanging onto a damn name, but do you realize how stupid this discussion is?
Voto:
I'll summarize everything for the hundredth time: I am not discussing THE NAME. I only USED a NAME to define A CONCEPT, which you also called "palese graziealcaz". You can call it whatever you want, I was talking about a record through a concept... you are talking about a name. We are having two different conversations, and you insist on saying that I mean this and that. I mean what I wrote, period. What I haven't written, I don't mean, I don't think, I haven't written. Instead of shooting blindly, for the umpteenth time: read again.
Voto:
So, the word "rock" can't be used anymore for albums released after 1979??????? ????? Please say yes........... >>> But where did you come up with that? Are you reading this review or on scaruffi.com? When have I ever written something like that? What planet are you from?