puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7966 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
PPS: you have at most turned my boring day into the corner of the angry punk because someone thinks the stuff he venerates is crap. I wrote that review for fun while reading angry people. You got angry, I had fun. Do you really think I wanted to praise Area by saying that Punk is shit? That "1978" in the title has nothing to do with punk, I just wanted to read some spits, I enjoy it that way too. Your spits from a disappointed old man really entertained me. If instead of breaking bottles you had turned on your brain, maybe you would have understood it too.
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
PS: I have the original discography of Velvet, Dream Theater make me VOMIT.
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
Technique is not an objective value in evaluating a group: sure. But it's quite different from saying technique is not an objective fact. Technique is an objective fact, even if it doesn't objectively influence evaluation. Learn Italian, you wrote two different things up and down. Then I'll repeat, as I wrote above: I don't give a fuck if someone is technical or not, so take your talk about Brian Eno to Basentini, not to me. That PanterA is just a rehash of Venom and Black Sabbath is a load of crap that shows how limited you are to one fucking genre and nothing else, and you know exactly which one I mean. That I use double standards: obviously, I use 175 different weights and measures, there is no objective weight like the one you think you have. My son, a couple of lies—as my father was thinking about creating a decent world when you were a bottle-smashing punk kid, not spitting on the ground like the jerk you are. Oh dude, go back to the retirement home for disappointed punks, the revolution has been over for a while now, and you have lost.
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
Which one? I don’t think I’ve given away the fifth one to anyone, but I’ve sent the first four far and wide. Instrumental or with a singer?
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
And then, on all the groups you mentioned above, if there are any (!!!) those are certainly not PanterA. They reigned supreme in their environment for years on end, producing one masterpiece after another, flipping the attitude from True to totally ridiculous when Deathster and Blackster were raging hard and pure. They are objectively a milestone of their movement. Then, whether they are the best band of the '90s, obviously, there is no best band of the '90s, but it is equally true that putting a (!!!) after PanterA is a serious load of bullshit. Wash your hands before typing the name of the Brothers Darrell, original, innovative, and imaginative like few, incredible stage animals that kept crowds of thousands of people jumping for two hours. PanterA in their field are not to be discussed.
Nirvana Nevermind
Nirvana Nevermind
16 mar 06
Voto:
Yes, but even though they are great bands, the fact remains that they can't handle their instruments. Technique is an objective fact. The "greatness/talent/quality/beauty" of a group is not objective because someone can technically suck but still be a great artist; but the fact that they suck technically is objective. I don't care if someone is super technical or not, but technique remains almost objectively measurable. But then, you're 40 years old and you’re still talking about the "best band"... aren’t you a bit too old for these kindergarten discussions? "Are the Led Zeppelin better or Charlie Parker"... on what basis do you evaluate such a comparison? It’s pointless and stupid.
Queen Queen II
Queen Queen II
14 mar 06
Voto:
They are all around you.
Queen Queen II
Queen Queen II
14 mar 06
Voto:
I don't know, I still have to open my eyes properly, I'll look closely and let you know.
Queen Queen II
Queen Queen II
14 mar 06
Voto:
PS: If someone doesn't open their eyes and mind and ears, they'll have to deal with me.
Queen Queen II
Queen Queen II
14 mar 06
Voto:
Thank you, I love testing tenderness.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7354

dominus_sathanas

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

_Teskyo_

DeRank™: 0,00

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

Badi

DeAge 7118

Workhorse

DeRank™: 6,75

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione