puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8162 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
First, it's obvious that I haven't read the review. Have I ever uttered a word about the review? No, just as I haven't uttered a word about the supposed bourgeoisie.
Voto:
I believe the problem stems from the preconceived notions that grip the minds of many. If you mention exorbitant costs for a concert, many immediately perceive that for you everything is overpriced, and according to you, you must screw the bourgeoisie or, alternatively, boycott them. If you say that Gilmour's tour was a joke, many quickly interpret that you think Gilmour is crap, and this and that. The real issue is that people read, and they never stick to what you actually wrote but instead elaborate on "your cosmic thought according to them." You write "this is crap," and they understand "the whole world is crap and the universe is diarrhea." Commonplace never die, and gaggioes will reign supreme.
Voto:
"Controversies" and "fake purist"... what does that mean? I say: Spending €46 to see Gilmour? You're crazy. Out of this have come: bourgeois philosophies, fake purism; if you're on the left, you can only be an underpaid worker, criticisms of Gilmour, '68, '70s protests... I just wanted to say: spending €46 to see Gilmour in the second gallery? You're crazy.
Voto:
You pulled the "bourgeois" speech out of your own hat, just like the one from '68; never spoke about such filthy bullshit. Anyway, everything always has its usefulness: from this, we've managed to extract the hilarious gem of the year, << yes...maybe I'm a bourgeois. by voting left, I'm probably being a bit more of a jerk. >> Damn, what a deep thought. So someone who votes right should feel guilty if they don’t have a Ferrari? But hasn’t anyone told you that the mid-season, alas, is no longer here? Maybe we'll all see each other at that meeting, the one where once it was all countryside.
Voto:
The W*uck is managed by a handsome man, and this is a great truth.
Voto:
Shine, you know I adore Gilmour. That doesn’t detach me from the thought that this concert was either a joke or extortion. If you think about it, David Gilmour as a solo artist isn’t worth a damn. His albums have made the history of music in his living room, at best they’ve influenced the bedside table and the chimney of his mountain chalet. I'd pay 100€ for tickets to see the Floyd, not for a damn nobody. The fact that he shows up and serves us things he participated in but didn't solely create seems like a joke at that price. These are bullshit for people who need timeless myths, like Floyd Man who is proud to have given 109 Euros to someone who has been doing the same stuff for, damn, thirty years. With 109 Euros, you could have gone to see about 10 concerts of people who are actually working to push the music forward. Giving 109 Euros to a joke is like galvanizing the crap that is the current music biz. Then people complain about the prices they have to face to follow music, well no shit, if there are folks who are boosting these jokes. Regardless of how much I love Gilmour's guitar, these are concerts to avoid at all costs.
Voto:
Let’s clarify that 46¤ were for the second gallery, not something out of the ordinary. Basically, it was an armed extortion by Strato. Keep On Babbio, The Gaggions Never Die.
Voto:
Only a Babbione like you could spend €46 to watch Gilmour play in that posh place in front of the Fighetta crowd. The meeting of the Babbioni at the Live location, for the series "come on David, take some of our money, you deserve a bit of cash, we’re all here at 90° for you." Seats for Liguori & Linus, indeed. Bambascione compilatio strikes again.
Voto:
And above all, if the thing, as you say, "is not up for discussion"... then what the hell are you doing here? You can create your Blog, and there, nothing gets discussed. You scan the rock encyclopedias and we all compete to jerk off in front of the screen. Yogurt Cream Zappa, make love, with Uncle Barore.
Voto:
Exactly, also Uncle Meat. There are too many that are better than this: 4. If you're arguing about influence, you can also take some nice missteps. Even Madonna has heavily influenced 20th-century music, but she still puts out crap. This is Zappa's easiest work, it was normal for it to become the most famous and the most influential, as it’s diluted and easily digestible. I don't love diluted and simplified things; I prefer the Zappa who creates the music that’s in his head. This is the Zappa that speaks to the masses; 4 is even too much. I couldn't care less about those you cite as the most influential albums of the 20th century; I listen to things and evaluate them with my own standards. I couldn't give a damn about those who decide for others. The one who hasn't understood a thing is you, thinking in citations and rankings of the most influential albums of the 20th century. Think For Yourself, Yogurt Per Tutti.