puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,39
DeAge™ : 8247 days • Here since 21 october 2003
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
But why, did I comment on the concert? When? Did I happen to say "what an awful concert," "I didn't go because of this and that..."? No. I only say that, for various reasons, that place was full of gaggi. And you keep confirming it to me, since I have yet to read a non-gaggio comment from anyone who was there. Understatements can only be calculated if you know the person; you don’t know me, and you can’t know what I imply. Just as I can’t do that with you. It seems to me that you’re gaggio, from what you write. Maybe you're not, but I have to stick to the material I have. You look for understatements, believing you understand 200 implied words from a single statement... you’re convinced I want to comment on a concert when I haven’t done so nor will I, nor am I interested or will I ever be. There’s no solid point in the discussion: it’s just chitchat. It’s that you kit-man need solid pillars of thought to base logic on; being in a kit, you lack flexibility. You’re made to one size, and beyond that, you don’t go. Try adding one more shelf: you’ll see how nice it is. (maybe also a satin stainless steel handle, it’s a little gem)
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
Obviously, there’s a steel factory on the cover. In reality, it was a subliminal message for the stock market debut of the English giants. Deep down, Waters was a Broker. No wonder Riccardo named his album Broken China, anticipating the wave of Eastern products in our years. From The Economist to Pink Floyd, the step is short. All that glitters is not gold, as Jamey Jasta of Hatebreed used to say.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
But where is the controversy? What is it? Warmongers, always looking for conflict... what terrible people... animals...
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
<<(maybe)>>. Do you see that you’re predisposed to fight? <<We’re trying to comment on a concert here, not make sense of your day>> And where the hell is that written? Do you happen to see any disclaimers that say "attention, we're trying to comment on a concert here! Other things are not allowed!"? You try to comment on a concert, good for you. I share my thoughts on this painful tour, good for me too. How closed-minded you are, wrapped up, predisposed, standard. Men in assembly kits from the counters of Ikea... in a word: losers.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
First, it's obvious that I haven't read the review. Have I ever uttered a word about the review? No, just as I haven't uttered a word about the supposed bourgeoisie.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
I believe the problem stems from the preconceived notions that grip the minds of many. If you mention exorbitant costs for a concert, many immediately perceive that for you everything is overpriced, and according to you, you must screw the bourgeoisie or, alternatively, boycott them. If you say that Gilmour's tour was a joke, many quickly interpret that you think Gilmour is crap, and this and that. The real issue is that people read, and they never stick to what you actually wrote but instead elaborate on "your cosmic thought according to them." You write "this is crap," and they understand "the whole world is crap and the universe is diarrhea." Commonplace never die, and gaggioes will reign supreme.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
"Controversies" and "fake purist"... what does that mean? I say: Spending €46 to see Gilmour? You're crazy. Out of this have come: bourgeois philosophies, fake purism; if you're on the left, you can only be an underpaid worker, criticisms of Gilmour, '68, '70s protests... I just wanted to say: spending €46 to see Gilmour in the second gallery? You're crazy.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
You pulled the "bourgeois" speech out of your own hat, just like the one from '68; never spoke about such filthy bullshit. Anyway, everything always has its usefulness: from this, we've managed to extract the hilarious gem of the year, << yes...maybe I'm a bourgeois. by voting left, I'm probably being a bit more of a jerk. >> Damn, what a deep thought. So someone who votes right should feel guilty if they don’t have a Ferrari? But hasn’t anyone told you that the mid-season, alas, is no longer here? Maybe we'll all see each other at that meeting, the one where once it was all countryside.
Inkarakùa La Giostra dell'Odio
Voto:
The W*uck is managed by a handsome man, and this is a great truth.
David Gilmour Teatro Arcimboldi Milano 24.03.06
Voto:
Shine, you know I adore Gilmour. That doesn’t detach me from the thought that this concert was either a joke or extortion. If you think about it, David Gilmour as a solo artist isn’t worth a damn. His albums have made the history of music in his living room, at best they’ve influenced the bedside table and the chimney of his mountain chalet. I'd pay 100€ for tickets to see the Floyd, not for a damn nobody. The fact that he shows up and serves us things he participated in but didn't solely create seems like a joke at that price. These are bullshit for people who need timeless myths, like Floyd Man who is proud to have given 109 Euros to someone who has been doing the same stuff for, damn, thirty years. With 109 Euros, you could have gone to see about 10 concerts of people who are actually working to push the music forward. Giving 109 Euros to a joke is like galvanizing the crap that is the current music biz. Then people complain about the prices they have to face to follow music, well no shit, if there are folks who are boosting these jokes. Regardless of how much I love Gilmour's guitar, these are concerts to avoid at all costs.