puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7910 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
See ajeje.
Voto:
Again with this Bruce story. I haven't commented on a Bruce album, I haven't even talked about his music in general, nor do I care to. I was only emphasizing a general nonsense. Bruce has nothing to do with it; he didn't write it.
Voto:
You wrote rock, not rock'n'roll. Maybe you don't realize the terms you use. Then you complain too. You write rock, one understands Rock. Not pure rock'n'roll. In fact, I repeat, this review is crap.
Voto:
Yeeah, there was an underlying meaning. The term "better" has a very specific meaning. But stop it.
Voto:
<<< I talked about the impact regarding the sax, not about the technique, complexity, and unpredictability. >>> No. You said it's the best use of the sax in rock that you know, along with Fun House by the Stooges and Idiots Rule by Jane's Addiction. Which, considering now that you also know King Crimson, is a giant pile of crap. I didn’t even mention Bruss’s music. I talked about the fans. It could be a fantastic sax solo, but to say it's the best of all time is a giant pile of crap. Also because "the best" doesn't exist. Now don't turn the tables on Bruss and his non-fans; the point of the discussion was your shitty review, not Bruss's album. Who the hell cares about Bruss's album?
Voto:
Of course, taking into account the biggest bullshit, I wouldn't want to downplay all the tsunami of crap that the kind fan just gifted us.
Voto:
In my opinion, if you're going to buy a Brùss album, the seller needs a certificate of coolness to sell it to you. << "Jungleland" and its inevitable sax solo (the best use of sax in rock that I know, along with Fun House by the Stooges and Idiots Rule by Jane's Addiction) >> This is one of the biggest objective bullshit statements ever written since the reviews of Mozart's debuts in the Gazzettino di Vienna. Two fucking notes of sax. After all, how does the sax of King Crimson and Gentle Giant compare to the sax of Jane's Addiction? But, above all, how the hell can you take the Stooges and Jane's Addiction as examples of "sax in rock"? Be ashamed, stop it, cut it out.
Ride Nowhere
26 may 06
Voto:
Don't say cat if you don't have it in the bag.
Voto:
I think I like it, also because we often see things differently when it comes to lengthy discussions :-)
Voto:
In the early 90s, the genre had already become quite annoying. Go on, send them in droves. This is the bullshit of the century; it even beats the one of the year. Come on, tell us more about this genre you know so well. Surely you have all the masterpieces of the genre. Send them in droves; we are here for that. To put it plainly, if you care about what you do and don't want to stay in your bubble: make us laugh.