puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7957 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Rating 5, because you also gave me the link. Socrates, the point is not "he did it the wrong way," but "he did it wrong." The ranking of the 10 greatest guitarists of all time doesn't exist, so on a "site" that claims to be an encyclopedia, nonsense like "he rightfully enters the ranking," no thanks, is false information. Page editing can be done; just register and inform the staff which entry you want to publish or correct inaccurate information. A guy I know is working on the Wikipedia page about Mike Patton, for example. Of course, it will be yet another exaggeration from a fan. Then, I don’t know how it works for other topics, but musically speaking, Wikipedia is hilarious. A serious and democratic music encyclopedia is simple to create: discography with release years and band line-up, number of records sold, collaborations, and other bands of the members. That’s it. The rest is all personal opinions, which have little place in an encyclopedia.
Voto:
Only if you tell me what Travel Is Dangerous is like. And don't tell me you didn't know it was out, because I won't believe you.
Voto:
Clearly, they have the server in Spain, where the porrito only needs a "monital." Now we should start a discussion on the question: is the rest of the world more advanced, or are the Spaniards more advanced?
Voto:
It seems blatantly dictatorial to me, absolutely the opposite of democratic. Since it's someone who writes that nonsense, it's just him who publishes it, and he alone states that thing, without even a counterpoint. A dictatorial judgment, with no chance for rebuttal. You have quite a peculiar view of democracy.
Voto:
You are right Qzè, you are entitled to half of the Jackpot. The Wikipedia page is infinitely sad; any musician is listed among the top ten of all time, they are all the best in their genre, they are all part of history. They should filter fan submissions better, especially if they want to present something serious. As long as we’re on debaser, it’s fine, but a site that promotes itself as an encyclopedia cannot spout colossal nonsense like including Slash among the 10 greatest guitarists in history. Or even better, “Today with Velvet Revolver he has opened his talent to more modern sounds, while never forgetting his roots.” Modern sounds in Velvet Revolver are bordering on the inconceivable.
Voto:
Monitorica, from Monitor. You are present on its monitor, so you are monitoric. And that is the second correct answer. The prize pool keeps getting more and more enticing.
Voto:
And who the hell is Saputello? This trend of having specific nicknames for reviews is so annoying.
Voto:
Saul Hudson, SL H#S#... Slash. What did I win?
Voto:
...and then light a candle in church for Punisher's son. But can you really imagine what it's like to have a jerk like that for a father? No, REALLY, THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH BAD LUCK THAT POOR KID HAS.
Voto:
It's nothing short of fabulous, but how is Travel Is Dangerous? When albums sell, reviews come out 3 months before the release. When albums are only put online, nobody cares about them. Reflect on this cosmic question, and post your impressions (both on Travel Is Dangerous and on global consumer behavior) at www.magosagazzu.splinder.it.