puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7957 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
And now let's move on to one versus one! en-thusiasm, e-e-enthusiasm!
Voto:
Our TV show is better than the one on Requiem For A Dream: e-e-enthusiasm, e-e-enthusiasm! We have a winner...ooohhh...
Voto:
No way, modern stuff. It connects directly to the satellite. You have to plug the antenna into the appropriate jack.
Voto:
Ah, Qzè: if you press the buttons, it sings songs.
Voto:
The track to be composed with the sampler is fabulous. I believe it's the best on the album, definitely among the best by Tool. Jones is stupid for breaking up tracks to be reassembled at home throughout the album, but the work involved is well compensated by the awesome result. It's a shame about Mammaynardo, which still annoys me even after seven million listens. It's also a bit of a shame about the lack of electronics included, but never as much as the annoyance caused by Mammaynardo. Still a solid 5, it's not the best by Tool but certainly in the top 10 albums of the year. Make yourselves the twelfth track, otherwise you’re gay.
Voto:
To make it up for the grazing, we’ll reassign Enea to Trell, Qzerty takes Enya, and with the first 5 calls, you get a set of silverplate food warmers signed by a muggle as a gift.
Voto:
But what the hell have the three little pigs been up to for 26 years?
Voto:
And if it's too lively for your tastes, ask Enya. (This was worthy of Josi_, but since she's not here, I'll take advantage of it)
Voto:
Yes, it's true, I explain myself poorly. In a more understandable summary: Wikipedia is amazing. General music encyclopedias, no. If I absolutely had to create one, I would only provide data, but I would prefer not to make one, and I would prefer they didn't exist. I don't mind specialized databases, because with ten people or more, focusing on a specific type of sound, genre, or movement, it can be done. Think progarchives.com or similar. Because the guitarist of Depeche Mode is a god in his genre just like Robert Fripp is in his, but how can one say if one is better than the other, given that they aim (and succeed) to produce completely different things? So Wikipedia, being general and covering all fronts, would be better if it only provided sterile data, and not nonsense like "Slash rightfully enters the top 10 guitarists of all time." W.pedia remains an excellent project, with of course some minor flaws as is normal given the difficult task it attempts to fulfill (for the sake of argument: why don’t you try to create an encyclopedia with 9 billion entries?). I condemn much more some crap from Lester Bangs (not that he only wrote crap, but some are terrifying and he himself retracted several of his statements), or Scaruffi, or anyone who ventures into games too large for one person.
Voto:
Good and useful is also rateyourmusic.