puntiniCAZpuntini

"You enjoy telling others 'they don't give a damn about you'." No, that was just the final remark. The post was centered around: wrong example. You keep shifting the focus of the discussion, and that's not getting us anywhere. And what a stroke of luck that you want to have a discussion.

"If the right side must be kept alive, it should be given some dignity." First, you wrote: "So if the right column has to be like this, it's better to suppress it." And don't tell me that I need to catch ironic nuances; if that were the case, you would have included emoticons. "You see, you don’t understand that a small change like the one that happened with the division between reviews could only do good." I didn't say I didn't understand; I only told you "you used the wrong example" at first, and "you addressed me in the wrong way" later. "Then if the supreme lord of Debaser doesn't give a damn about me, I certainly don't feel like a failure." I didn't say you should feel like a failure; I just told you: he doesn’t care about you. I didn't add anything else. "But in the meantime, I express my opinion, which is far from being meaningless." It's not the opinion, it's the example. There's a difference; read carefully. "And then since you have nothing to do with the creators of the site and editors, why do you respond?" I responded because you were talking to me, mistakenly placing me where I am neither, have been, nor want to be. So I had to respond, and no one else, in the second case. In the first case, I pointed out the nonsense of your example because I wanted to. And it was nonsense, the example. Or wrong. Or "it didn't matter at all." Not the opinion; I didn't even question the opinion.

Anyone who tries to be a know-it-all fails; it's impossible to succeed. Scaruffi attempts, but time and again he fails, which is normal.

Then let me point out another "non-sense," since you’re so knowledgeable it’s always nice to show you when your reasoning doesn’t add up: you claim several times that the "right-left" selection often and willingly suffers from flaws. So, what makes you think that the "published-discarded" selection is any less flawed? Not to mention that, on the right you read the same, discarded instead no. And you can’t read, and those who write see their time discarded. On paper, I see it destined to fail within 2 days. Unless you’re now proposing an axiom according to which "published-discarded" is less fallible than "right-left." By tomorrow, I want a copy of the treatise on my desk.

I read a lot of "You," but I don't fit into the "You" at all. I was merely pointing out the "nonsense" of your example. I notice a "You" worth highlighting: << because you have to publish everything for sure, otherwise you aren't precise enough. >> I have never published anything in my life, never been an editor. But you're wrong again with your example; you see, the site, you're right, is not yours nor the editors'. The site belongs to whoever pays for the domain, created it, and wants it that way. It's all very democratic and """""""communist"""""" this site, but the fact remains that fundamentally, it's a site with an owner, who pays for the domain, who takes responsibility for what is written here and many other nice things. You don't pay for the domain, and no one asks you to do so. You don't take responsibility, and no one asks you to do it. You haven't spent hours and hours "building" the system. You don't spend hours and hours correcting and improving the system. You are a guest. You're completely free to propose "censorship" for the millionth time; I was just informing you that you are precisely the millionth person to suggest it, and I'm 1000% sure you won't even be "noticed at all."

An example that doesn’t fit and is completely out of place. First of all, the garden is not yours at all (nor is it mine, to be clear). Someone rang the gate and said, "I have horse manure, can I drop it off?" and the owner replied, "Yes, of course." Later, while taking a few steps in someone else's garden, you stepped in the poop, and you got angry. But the only person you should be upset with is yourself, because you chose to enter this garden, despite the fact that the fence is full of gardens like this. The process is always the same: someone arrives, writes a couple of comments and reviews, a few months pass, and then they start saying, "but this isn't right!" It was like this before you arrived, it is like this now that you are here, and it will remain like this even if you leave.

Don't go to Ufomammut, do humanity a favor: go to Colour Haze. ITALIAN DATES -- Friday, October 20th - Milan @ Night For The Deaf c/o Cox 18 + El-Thule Vinyl Set /// Saturday, October 21st - Cattolica @ Teatro Snaporaz + Deadpeach + Atomic Dog /// Free wurstel for the first 100.

ITALIAN DATES -- Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - Pescara @ First Floor + ZIPPO //
Thursday, January 18, 2007 - Rome @ Sinister Noize Club + DOOMRAISER //
Friday, January 19, 2007 - Milan @ Cox 18 + El-THULE //
Saturday, January 20, 2007 - Verona @ Lucille + EL-THULE // Obviously, those who miss it die.

ITALIAN DATES -- November 30th - Vicenza @ Sabotage Bar // December 1st - Milan @ Circolo Arci Magnolia // December 2nd - Rome @ Forte Prenestino // Of course, featuring Italian bands. Obviously, anyone who misses it is gay.

Considering that in terms of music, nothing better comes out of the United States than the Green Day>>> STRONZATA DA CASO UMANO. The USA is the most musically cultured nation on planet Earth, perhaps not in proportion (since there are many of them) but in sheer numbers, no one can possibly think of keeping up with them. For every UK band, there are 10 from the USA, across every genre, no exceptions. The best record labels in the world are in the USA. The best CD distribution is in the USA. If you want a CD but can’t find it, you’ll find it in the USA. You’ve just shot one of the best bullshit statements I’ve ever read in my life, you’re phenomenal: keep them coming.