puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7956 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Tazenda Murales
19 oct 06
Voto:
So it's an ignorant person who translated it on their site. It's full of outrageous and basic errors, it looks like it was written by a Bolognese on vacation. The internet is teeming with nonsense, just look at certain reviews on DeBaser where you find women turned into men, wrong dates spanning decades, etc. Rest assured: that translation is overflowing with bullshit.
Tazenda Murales
18 oct 06
Voto:
The translation is full of errors, we’re missing pieces, and the commas are placed so poorly that they change the meaning of the text. Beautiful the point where you translate Figli with Nonni, but you really need to review the conjunctions: you confuse "with" with "in" and various other things. Hilarious the fact that dillu remains dillu, when there are eighty ways to translate it into Italian. Failed, resoundingly. Also in the review, the commas are placed very differently from how the piece is sung, and they change the meaning. Both failed. The Tazenda also failed, who I’ve always hated, and they made me study that damn song in elementary school. So everyone failed, at least next year you’ll know your classmates.
Queen Hot Space
18 oct 06
Voto:
The nonsense this guy spews is incredible. I want a poster of yours.
Queen Hot Space
18 oct 06
Voto:
Josi, you’re right, we should have shared the comedy of Starman. He has done quite a few, one better than the other. Read them all, he’s the best of autumn '06, trying to dethrone Francis. I highly recommend it to you.
Queen Hot Space
18 oct 06
Voto:
"I really appreciate these Fugazi even though I don't know them, but we know for 99% it's not like that." Come on! More pearls of Italian, more pearls of "reasoning"! Send us a thousand, go with the subjunctive at the beginning of the sentence with the present in the middle and the past participle at the end, go on, let us dream that you're the best!
Queen Hot Space
18 oct 06
Voto:
"I'm not interested in music; I'm interested in artists who, in addition to music, must also have such a captivating stage presence that it stays etched in the mind." Aside from the "I'm interested in that they must have," which is a mistake from elementary school, this concept is one of the most idiotic I've ever heard or read in my life. It's like measuring an athlete's skill by the women he sleeps with; it's like assessing the professionalism of an accountant by the jokes he tells. How can one proudly say that a musician is not evaluated based on their music, but on their stage presence? You're a human case worthy of a world Hit Parade; please: I want a daily thought from you, all as hilarious as this one.
Voto:
Everything is very nice, but the review isn't mine. I haven't even heard it, and I don't think I ever will of my own accord.
Voto:
I looked just now, but there's no trace of your message. Anyway, go to where it says Chupacabra, that’s the booking agency. There aren’t many updates because, being a "no-profit" agency that only looks for dates to open for more established bands, they can't afford to promote too much. But still, these are confirmed dates, zero scams from Colour Haze, especially since they brought the Italians to Germany two weeks ago, and now they have to return the favor.
Voto:
Very good, but I didn't want to get into this discussion at all. I just wanted to tell you "you used the wrong example," and then "you picked the wrong person to include in the Voi." That's all, really.
Voto:
<< Sorry, but do these two sentences seem contradictory to you? >> Yes, if you read what follows, namely << So I wasn't saying as you reported to make a distinction between publishing and censorship >>. Because yes, you were saying that. Maybe I misunderstood, but you were saying it.