puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7949 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
<< I don't understand the press calling Incubus the clones of Red Hot. But where is it? >> Well, on everything that came after SCIENCE, I think they're right, very Red Hot. Especially on the ballads, the inspiration is so great that it borders on plagiarism. For example, I haven't said in years that "I like Incubus," because by now the amount of crap they've produced surpasses the amount of good stuff. Science remains one of the best albums I've ever heard, but Incubus has been a shit band for almost ten years now, that's not insignificant.
Muse Starlight
1 dec 06
Voto:
Nick, the ajò is outdated. Use the "càtta," it's more fitting "for your character." I can totally see you with the càtta, ask Surfer or Hal for confirmation. I'd lend you the Caz, but I care about it too much, sorry. I love you still, though.
Voto:
When have the Peppers ever just brushed against electronics? NEVER. When have the Peppers ever waved goodbye to Metal? NEVER. When have the Peppers ever included elements apart from the usual guitar, bass, drums? NEVER. The Peppers are "well-educated punkers on the sly," it’s written in their DNA that they will NEVER create a true masterpiece like Science. Maybe nice albums, maybe very nice, but nothing more. God selects certain people from above, the only exception in all creation has been King Buzzo.
Voto:
<< Have they ever made a masterpiece like BLOODSUGARSEXMAGIK? >> Science fucks itself in reverse. There’s really no comparison, BSSM is beautiful, yes, very well-crafted, very nice, appealing but... Science is genius, technically perfect, meticulously crafted, ahead to the point of being terrifying, varied like very few albums in history. Then yes, Incubus have only made that one memorable album while the Peppers have two or three nice works, but when it comes to peaks, well, there’s no game even if Boyd & Co. tie their hands behind their backs, strap on 8 cilices per leg, and cut off all their toes with a 1300s pliers. Ah, I almost forgot: "point & that's it."
Voto:
<< Niggaz don’t listen to jazz >> Bullshit. << cultural baggage >> No, it’s called cultural semi-axis. << Hip hop and its culture are real, true >> Enormous phosphorescent bullshit with hints of excessive reflectivity. << Before Guru, only Stetsasonic; the Roots and Digable Planets are practically contemporaneous; >> Bullshit. << Mc Solaar (the most famous non-English-speaking rapper on the planet) >> Bullshit: where do you place Puerto Rico? << Is that enough? >> No. Send me a thousand, but you have to manage to insert more bullshit like this. I know it's complicated, but I believe you can do it.
Voto:
No. I base my thoughts on what I think. Then if there are many of us, it's always better (as Paris Hilton said).
Voto:
No, wrong again. Not "mine," but everyone's who commented here. So let's say that for now, apparently, it seems that is "the truth," while yours, yours alone since no one told you "yes," seems just like a galactic bullshit. Do the math. You'll see: it adds up.
Voto:
Beautiful. The point remains unchanged: << reviewing AD I say that it anticipated nu metal because AD particularly refers to nu >> No, it's nonsense. Great, among other things.
Voto:
But you're being tricky, aren't you? You didn't actually write that FNM anticipated nu; you wrote: << In short, this is a work that probably reaches the peak of the crossover movement and anticipates all nu metal groups >>. So you were talking about this work, not about FNM. We wouldn't have bothered you like this because there's a difference between taking 6 albums and picking just one. If you say that Wretch by Kyuss anticipated stoner, you're talking nonsense. If you say that Kyuss anticipated stoner, you're stating a fact. FNM anticipated nu long before this album, and by the time they got to this, they had already moved into other areas. Neither better nor worse, just different. Don't be sneaky.
Voto:
"...And then there was the groundhog that was making the vinyls..."