puntiniCAZpuntini

I can't stand the "boss."

I don't listen to supernatural cat products, out of passion. Even if Jimi Hendrix were resurrected with Bonzo's & K. Moon's double drums and Pastorius on bass.

I'll get the DVD.

Wow: Wino, Oh, Wino. But, damn, innovation is quite a big word :-)

Beautiful, very much. Too bad about the album, I like it a lot, but an extra doom band was less needed than a psych-doom band like Yob. Even with Yob, as time went by, the psychedelia diminished, yet there was certainly more of it in Unreal Never Lived than in this. Still, it remains a great doom album, and Sheidt is a guy with balls. Psycho, from Yob, listen to Elaboration Of Carbon and/or Catharsis. Alongside Sons Of Otis, Yob were the only ones who could stand close to Electric Wizard (close, but not beside).

<<< In what enthusiasts consider the quintessential Stoner Band of the post-Kyuss era. >>> You're doing terribly. Bad bad bad. <<< The Palm Desert brigade >>> From Palm Desert, there’s nobody in this lineup. << enriched by the psychedelic atmosphere that resonates throughout the work, >> Psychedelia, the qotsa? You’re doing terribly. <<< There are unmistakably stoner episodes, >>> You're doing bad bad bad. <<< amplifiers shot up to the ionosphere >>> But really, you're doing bad bad bad. A review to be included among "the most full of nonsense on the site." Off the top of my head, I remember one about Hawkwind that claimed they were a post-Maiden metal band, one about the Beastie Boys filled with nonsense that I can’t recall now, and another about the qotsa, but from the first album. Who knows how many I’ve forgotten, anyway this one is certainly among the most full of nonsense on the site. Amplifiers Shot Up to the Ionosphere. In the best cinemas.

"Los Angeles Forum on September 4, 1970." is what is found in the double DVD from 2002, right? If so, 5.

cptgaio, the beauty is that there’s something for everyone. Long, short, detailed, scattered... everything. The discussion on "how to write" has been held in at least 500 reviews. At least, 500 in number, not just to say "a lot". No offense, but I’m tired of talking about it :-) - If you want, read the old discussions from which the rules originated. (They’re in the "help", anyway) /// Antmo, the entire soulseek community is wondering where you are. If you don’t come back soon, they’re threatening to shut down the server.

Cptgaio, the staff expressly requests a maximum of 30 lines. I never count them, but I try to keep a reading time of no more than 1 minute, pushing it to 1 minute and a half at most. And I always manage to stay within the 30 lines. At first, I did it to "play by the rules," but now it’s become second nature, since I fully share the way creators would like reviews to be. Sometimes, rather than dwelling on comparisons or explanations, I include links as in this case. If I were to explain in detail the influences of this album, I would have written 150 lines. Instead, if someone wants, they can read the linked reviews. It’s just one way to explain many things in a single word. Plus, I also promote the beautiful pages of the site so that they don’t get forgotten amidst the truly forgettable things. And I'm not saying that those who write long ones are gay, but I simply prefer to be concise and light. // As for the pedophile priest, if we really want to talk about it, my choices have always been selected since editors have existed. I pay handsomely every month, therefore: I demand.

Ajeje, I’m trying to send my first sample in years of career, but it tells me I’m causing a fantastic error in the de-server. /// Pyscho: on Mammatus Vs. Earthlings I passionately vote for Mammatus. Much, much more varied, more progressive, and heavier. The Earthlings, in the end, are just an excellent guitarist who shoots a 20-minute solo over a rhythm section that doesn’t change even if you pay them. Nice nonetheless, eh, I love this stuff, but I really like the Mammatus too much. The second one, anyway, is better than the first. Boris, well, they’ve been a guarantee for quite some time now. As for Tivol, I really like last year’s: Interstellar Overbike. They have the downside of the singer wanting to do hippy nonsense like Amon Duul or Guru Guru, I love all revivals, but spouting nonsense into the microphone as if I were in the 60s seems pointless to me. But they also play psychedelia, so they’re great nonetheless. I have Solar Anus & Zodiacs, but I still have to listen to them. I’m increasingly happy with the trend that has been created since 2005; the revival of heavy rock is diminishing more and more, making way for a tide of new acid and sick bands. For me, as long as it’s acid psychedelia and rock, it’s a solid 5. Always. // Nick, you’re absolutely right, but everyone has the human cases they deserve. You review romantic things, whether they’re classy, dreamy, or decadent. I’m a metalhead, I can’t expect any particular audience. Human Case Up Your Ass.