puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8013 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
As you see fit.
Voto:
<<< you have to be consistent, >>> You have to?! ...Have to?! << Why didn’t you vote on the 35007 review? >> I don’t know? Maybe I didn’t read it, maybe I forgot to vote, maybe I just didn’t feel like writing... Wallace... Aircraft carrier in B12...
Voto:
<<< He wants to swim against the tide even when it’s unnecessary! >>> I didn’t understand the reference. If you’re referring to the album, well, I’m not the only one who finds the early Natas a bit lacking. <<Because of you, my comments will never be divèrs!>> Huh? What do I have to do with divers? <<<You have to come against me a priori.>> I didn’t like the review, that’s it. I didn’t write anything else, nor do I think it, nor do I want to write it. These are reviews, it’s not Battleship.
Voto:
Nod Scene.
Voto:
Well, Planeta Solitario is a great track, if nothing else because it’s a piece to test your stereo. Rarely do I remember hearing a woofer struggle like that, and it’s a beautiful thing. Then comes Patatas De Elefante which is even better. This is a pretty gay album; the first Natas were too clone-like for my taste, but from Corsario Negro onwards, there’s been a three-thousand percent increase. For me, the best one is definitely the last one. The "pasquetta drug oriented" reviews have become quite annoying, an overly used & copied writing style.
Voto:
Nice club, and nice house. The Italians Deadpeach are also down there (good).
Voto:
<< or "Rapadopa" which were compilations, >> Ahhh, now rapadopa is a compilation, you got it all, really all of it. <<< over the years there have been better albums than SxM, like Neffa's own albums. >>> Neffa's albums can be "better" when listened to now. But when Neffa came out in '96, people (everyone, the people) said "wow, great album Neffa," because everyone had already heard SxM & Rapadopa, and Neffa only made "improvements" or "variations on the theme." When SxM came out, everyone was left speechless. No improvements on anything, and no theme to vary, all brand new stuff never heard before. That's why SxM is unattainable, while Neffa made good albums. And I repeat, since you weren't there and can't understand, just be quiet.
Voto:
And above all, it must be taken into account that to make an album like that, back in '93, you needed MILLIONS in equipment. Millions (in lire), no exaggeration at all. Now with a thousand euros, you can make all the rap albums you want with Steve Jobs. If there had been the current self-production possibilities back then, we would have had three hundred more masterpieces. The new school is worth half a nail of the first, it’s obvious and verifiable. Try to make an album with just a sampler, then let me know what you think.
Voto:
I think SxM has lived a bit too long off their past glories; they were powerful, but they were the only ones...!!! Bullshit worthy of a garrote. If you weren't there, if you were little and in elementary school, if you were average and in middle school, or if you were there but don't remember... shut up. There were more groups back then than there are now, and they were also promoted by major record labels (see Century Vox). Get yourself a compilation of crap called "Nati Per Rappare," and you'll see there were plenty of people around, it's just that the SM were light-years ahead. And without Dj Gruff & Deda (the first to insert played parts, both in rapadopa and in zero stress), this record wouldn’t exist, and Tayone might be a metalhead. Maybe you’re 15 and that's forgivable, but trust me, it’s better to stay quiet than to say immense bullshit.
Voto:
Artificial Intelligence is perhaps the instrumental peak of Eindhoven & province.