puntiniCAZpuntini

Come on, one doesn't need to write "for me" 189 times in every comment. It's obvious that, since we're talking about things where personal taste reigns supreme, the "for me" is implied by default. Sure, if they turned off all the radios, I'd be happier because people would be forced to look for records themselves, and they would definitely find better things than what’s playing around. Maybe you walk into a bar at Termini Station and find yourself in the middle of "The Best Band You Never Heard In Your Life," or even Suomi Finland Perkele. There would be more personality in public places, and not just that damn Linus or Albertino. For me, you know, for me.

<<< I find audiobooks extremely useful >>> a can opener is useful too. Let's review them! << Caz, Caz... it makes sense for you, but only for you, right! >> For me, only what makes sense to me has the right to exist. Since it's a personal opinion, I am my own law. I'm not saying you’re all idiots, I'm just saying I would feel like an idiot. But since when do we debate a personal opinion here? <<< free hands easily lead to distraction. >>> That has a pretty good double meaning.

<< And a smile every now and then, right >> Actually, I've been laughing since yesterday. You can't imagine what expression I have. << you didn't discuss the work, >> Oh really? I discussed the work in its primary essence, which is: it makes no sense to exist. << Good for someone to tell me "look, I listened to this audiobook and it sucked": >> As I told you before, look in the address bar: it says debaser, not audiobooks. But you promoted yourself, didn't you? Now I'm laughing (just informing you since I notice your interest in my state of mind).

<< Given that if you don't like audiobooks, you can simply choose not to listen to them, >> that's a pointless argument. You wrote a review on a site where works are discussed. And I am discussing the work. Of course, if I don't like the work, I won't take it, but that doesn't change the fact that if you write here, it is assumed you want to discuss it. If you didn't want to discuss it, then you shouldn't have written, that seems like a much more straightforward argument than yours. <<< I find much of it petty and a bit childish >>> From bad to worse! You use this site to promote yourself, and I'm the childish and petty one. You give it a four, because five would be a bit exaggerated, and I'm the childish and petty one. << in Anglo-Saxon countries, audiobooks have a huge tradition >> And Muslims don't eat pork. So what? And after the fact that audiobooks are popular in Anglo-Saxon countries, how should that change anything for me? In Italy, Maria Di Filippi is popular... so, is Maria De Filippi a good and right thing? It doesn't seem so to me. << who is tired of listening to music. >> You're a site that's 90% about music; it was very likely to find someone (in this case, me) who would tell you that listening to something other than music is pointless for them. << all these little moral lectures are a bit exaggerated >> Little moral lectures? I just said that I think it's a stupid thing. That is, my opinion. If you like it, well, good for you. Some people like to be frustrated, some people like to kill and torture others, so it's not that I'm scandalized by the fact that you listen to a book. I was just shocked by another fact that testifies (for me) to the immense laziness that pervades our time. If you wanted to receive praise or discuss the technical side of what you've done, you should have written your review on audiobooks.com, but remember that you wrote it on Debaser, where people use their stereo for other things.

"The pleasure of telling and being told," But I fully agree. If someone tells me something, I always listen with pleasure if the something is interesting. But what they tell me, I can't find it in the bookstore. There's a big difference. "The radio in totality from the programs you mention because it's like judging music by taking the Take That." Noooo.

<< the lack of empathy, >> I'm not very convinced. << in my opinion, it's the lack of pussy >> There are three women for every man in the world. There's no shortage, but laziness in looking for it. We should take into account that there are more gay men than lesbians, so the percentage would increase even more! The world is full of pussy therefore, enough with the audiobooks! (public service announcement)

Well, if we want <<< a scripted reconstruction of the novellas in question >> I read it (reading, how nice) in various versions. Let's start from "summary for idiots" to "compression of a great thing into a half-assed piece." If Poe wrote 100 pages, it has to be 100 pages. Why ruin everything by compressing it? It's like a soundtrack CD, where they compress serious pieces of 15 minutes into choruses of three. Or like a commercial jingle. How disgusting. I'm going to bed indignant with the world.