puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7950 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
<< And a smile every now and then, right >> Actually, I've been laughing since yesterday. You can't imagine what expression I have. << you didn't discuss the work, >> Oh really? I discussed the work in its primary essence, which is: it makes no sense to exist. << Good for someone to tell me "look, I listened to this audiobook and it sucked": >> As I told you before, look in the address bar: it says debaser, not audiobooks. But you promoted yourself, didn't you? Now I'm laughing (just informing you since I notice your interest in my state of mind).
Voto:
<< Given that if you don't like audiobooks, you can simply choose not to listen to them, >> that's a pointless argument. You wrote a review on a site where works are discussed. And I am discussing the work. Of course, if I don't like the work, I won't take it, but that doesn't change the fact that if you write here, it is assumed you want to discuss it. If you didn't want to discuss it, then you shouldn't have written, that seems like a much more straightforward argument than yours. <<< I find much of it petty and a bit childish >>> From bad to worse! You use this site to promote yourself, and I'm the childish and petty one. You give it a four, because five would be a bit exaggerated, and I'm the childish and petty one. << in Anglo-Saxon countries, audiobooks have a huge tradition >> And Muslims don't eat pork. So what? And after the fact that audiobooks are popular in Anglo-Saxon countries, how should that change anything for me? In Italy, Maria Di Filippi is popular... so, is Maria De Filippi a good and right thing? It doesn't seem so to me. << who is tired of listening to music. >> You're a site that's 90% about music; it was very likely to find someone (in this case, me) who would tell you that listening to something other than music is pointless for them. << all these little moral lectures are a bit exaggerated >> Little moral lectures? I just said that I think it's a stupid thing. That is, my opinion. If you like it, well, good for you. Some people like to be frustrated, some people like to kill and torture others, so it's not that I'm scandalized by the fact that you listen to a book. I was just shocked by another fact that testifies (for me) to the immense laziness that pervades our time. If you wanted to receive praise or discuss the technical side of what you've done, you should have written your review on audiobooks.com, but remember that you wrote it on Debaser, where people use their stereo for other things.
Voto:
"The pleasure of telling and being told," But I fully agree. If someone tells me something, I always listen with pleasure if the something is interesting. But what they tell me, I can't find it in the bookstore. There's a big difference. "The radio in totality from the programs you mention because it's like judging music by taking the Take That." Noooo.
Voto:
<< the lack of empathy, >> I'm not very convinced. << in my opinion, it's the lack of pussy >> There are three women for every man in the world. There's no shortage, but laziness in looking for it. We should take into account that there are more gay men than lesbians, so the percentage would increase even more! The world is full of pussy therefore, enough with the audiobooks! (public service announcement)
Voto:
damn this is a champion of audiobooks! Michele from California, audiobooks by passion.
Voto:
Technically, radio is a marvelous medium, but since what plays is decided by Linus, it ends up being crap. Every now and then, there's something decent, but never as decent as what I want to hear at that moment, which by turning off the radio, you will feel. It's a kind of laziness too: you don't feel like picking a record. Years ago, it could have been a way to discover new bands, and I can't argue with that, but now with the internet, radio has lost its purpose (especially programs like "lo zoo di 105"). As for the reinterpretation of writings, I swear I don't follow you; it doesn't make sense to me, especially when read by someone else. You say, well, grandma's fairy tales. They're for kids. To me, the warmth of someone else's expression makes me think of this
Voto:
Well, if we want <<< a scripted reconstruction of the novellas in question >> I read it (reading, how nice) in various versions. Let's start from "summary for idiots" to "compression of a great thing into a half-assed piece." If Poe wrote 100 pages, it has to be 100 pages. Why ruin everything by compressing it? It's like a soundtrack CD, where they compress serious pieces of 15 minutes into choruses of three. Or like a commercial jingle. How disgusting. I'm going to bed indignant with the world.
Voto:
But the radio must die; it’s a useless object. If someone puts the radio in my car, I press the passenger ejection button. I’m looking online and apparently, it's full of people lounging on the couch listening to audiobooks. You lose the taste, you lose everything. If there’s no trance created by the concentration on frantic reading that makes you lose touch with your surroundings, what’s the point of a book? For me, it’s just laziness. The worst disease of modern man.
Voto:
As Nick would say: but had you run out of maruzze to pick that day? Can you read the comments, or should I send them to you as audio?
Voto:
Oh my God, you wrote the script! But what the hell does that mean? Poe writes the book, and you write the audiobook script? BUT WHY? WHY?