puntiniCAZpuntini

<<< I didn't shoot bullshit, man, I only reported news that, as you confirmed, is circulating >>> Ok, now I'm going to report all the news I've read on forzaitalia.it, since "if news is circulating..." Turn on your brain before reading. The one about Berlusconi's accountant, his only true great ally, is good for those who have never seen a calculator in their life, come on...

"It pisses me off to see the Sardinian coasts cemented," Ok, let's find another source of livelihood. Come on, make us laugh. We live off tourism and construction related to tourism, it's hard and ugly to say but that's how it is (of course not everyone directly depends on it, but I believe I don't need to explain that if the main economic source falls, the others will fall like dominoes as a consequence). Do you host us all at your place? The point is NOT to NOT build, but to build well. Look at Hawaii, they build everything out of wood, it's nice to see, and the main business now isn’t building but renovating and maintaining wooden structures. There's always a solution, and rarely is the solution prohibition. (well, besides that, I would legalize whores and drugs restricted to certain tourist towns, but that's another story)

It is right to ban traffic for Euro 1 cars, in my opinion. Beyond that, if you want, you can still drive. Transform your old car into a "Classic" with a simple registration in the appropriate section of ACI. You pay a tax and insurance with discounts of 80%, and you can cruise around in cars that should be Euro less 20. Milan is full of Mustangs, how is that? I reiterate that I would be more than happy to ban the circulation of such cars without at least having complied with the minimal standards (filters, exhaust, carburetors, etc.), because after all, you buy them for their beauty and not to race, given that a Clio Sport from last year easily beats any Mustang from the '60s and '70s without even seeing them in the rearview mirror (and it handles the road, with a Mustang if you don’t know what you’re doing, you’re a dead man).

<< Does an old car that drives 1500KM a year pollute more than a new SUV that drives 30,000? >> What kind of question is that? What are you trying to get at, "people, drive less!"? Nonsense for nonsense, let me ask you a question: if a Cayenne collides head-on with a Uno from '89, which driver dies? :D

<< Puntinicaz... instead, how is the one you voted for instead of Soru doing, you say it's for the "people"... >> No, look, it has nothing to do with it. I mentioned the first name that came to my mind among the new rich of the "new economy". However, since we're at it, I want to point out one thing: << son of Berlusconi's accountant >> THE accountant of Berlusconi. So this daddy Cappellacci manages the income and expenses of Mondadori, Fininvest, Mediaset, Edilnord... bullshit and nonsense. He is the son of A accountant who handled some real estate transactions in Sardinia for Berlusconi, it's different. But I'm not pointing this out because "who he is" is important, but simply because it makes no sense to say THE accountant of Berlusconi, yet these are the rumors floating around. They circulate on the left and they circulate on the right, and everyone absorbs the things read sometimes without engaging their brains. <<< if the business hires idiots who can't even handle a glass >>> I have no idea who you’re talking about and maybe in your case it’s true, but it’s always easy to talk about someone else's work, surely when they talk about you, they say you don’t do a damn thing from morning till night. And now let’s move on to something serious << He hasn’t unlocked any land to create a kind of Costa Turchese, a new Costa Smeralda >> Those were buildable lands for ages, which Soru blocked causing a lot of people and a lot of businesses who had already invested in them to go bankrupt, so please stop spouting off nonsense about things you know nothing about. Point number 2: How many blocked lands did Soru buy, at a lower price due to the blockage (those who had already invested had to recover money to pay off debts), through real estate agencies based in England that are making him a fortune? Do you know this? No, because it’s legal to do, but it’s the act of a son of a bitch. So, I don’t want to talk about Soru, but just like I don’t talk about regional politics in Umbria because I don’t know a damn thing, you should avoid discussing Sardinian politics, which was only making headlines because Soru isn’t just any pinkpallino, but it was all just nonsense in the national circuit. In fact, he lost, despite them having put forth the last jerk (Cappellacci) after the rejections from the big names (maybe you didn’t even know Cappellacci was the fifth choice).

"I'm sorry, but they don't PRODUCE billions, they are VALUED at billions." Yes, tell Renato Soru that they don’t produce a damn thing, and he'll have a good laugh from up in his helicopters.

Jurix, you've said a lot of nonsense about cars, technically speaking, let me say that without offense. Regarding the stickers, it's a bit different from saying "they force you to change cars." As for the factories, "DAICO, BERTONE, SIMAT ABRASIVI" were not market leaders at all; Nokia in the Caserta area didn't seem to have the company's nerve center. I work in construction, and the situation isn't good, okay, but I don't believe your friends are all leaders in the sector. I didn't say "wow, how great," but I did tell you that "forcing" was wrong, and "leaders in the sector" was nonsense. And especially... so what? You came to the conclusion that there's a crisis? Damn, how did you figure that out?

"I don't want a world revolution; I would settle for much less, for example, that people were not hypocritical and that they didn't talk about the 'virtues' of work." I understand what you mean, but you're talking about a planet where millions of people buy U2 records. This is a practical example to say: the population needs a command, someone who takes responsibility for the consequences and, of course, the many advantages. So, since I believe that 'self-management' will never take off, I find a world revolution more feasible, albeit still incredibly complicated. I'm not saying you're talking nonsense; I'm just saying that you're addressing colossal matters, and even after just half an hour of thinking about it, you've already found 38 gigantic problems connected to solving the first huge problem. I can't handle it.

I also consider anyone who changes their phone every three months as smart as a vegetable chopper, but it doesn't harm me seriously. He's a fool, but that's worse for him. The waste problem is getting heavier and heavier, okay. If governments seriously commit to controlling their disposal (like employing all surplus public workers or private workers on unemployment benefits), then companies will emerge that will invest in research and find ways to eliminate waste cleanly (the system already exists, it's just too expensive), and jobs and money will also be created from there. The waste problem exists because there's a system of throwing everything away haphazardly, and in Italy, it's nothing... have you ever seen landfills in Indochina? It's an incredible sight. Have you ever seen the landfill in Chicago? It's wonderful (one of Obama’s proudest achievements).

<< they keep making laws to force us to change our car every 5 years >> wrong example (besides the fact that no law "forces" you to change it every five years, there are still cars from the 60s on the road) that's the only field where it's positive for humanity to eliminate old productions. An old car pollutes more (for those who use it in the city), brakes less (for those who use it on highways), holds the road less well (for those who use it on winding country roads). An old and worn-out car is dangerous wherever you use it. Then, about mobile phones and other things, yes, it's idiotic to change them twice a year but... nobody is forcing you. << what’s the point of seeing companies or corporations you've never heard of being listed on the stock market that generate billions >> The point is that they produce billions, it’s not difficult << factories "industry leaders" with extremely high production peaks that suddenly close overnight? >> Give us an example, I've never seen one. Anyway, fine, nice speech: start thinking of a multi-century plan for the retirement of consumerism too. It's easy-peasy, why hasn’t anyone done it yet?