puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7949 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I didn't know the Buzzcocks' era. As for the rest, I repeat: no. You can say whatever you want, but you're too ignorant about music in general to understand what I’m saying. For you, "having broad views" means moving among four or five subgenres of rock n roll, and you're convinced you're talking about who knows what.
Voto:
And then, if you really want to be nitpicky, it’s actually the Buzzcocks who copy from Wire, since they debuted several months later. But still, no, they are not similar at all. A Buzzcocks record has a sound (sound, not notes or anything else, just sound) that is poor, meager, and skinny. A Wire record is recorded six or seven million times better, and that’s no small feat, for me.
Voto:
Well, many Post-Punk groups wouldn’t even have existed without the Pistols or the Buzzcocks. Not the ones you mentioned, since, in the case of Wire, they formed even before the Sex Pistols. Post-Punk before punk, because the critics of the time immediately realized that, although it was neither standard rock nor progressive rock, it certainly wasn’t punk. The first two albums by Wire, which you evidently don’t know, are absolutely similar to the tracks by the Buzzcocks and the stylistic elements that you "condemn." No.
Voto:
"The prog is much, much more self-referential than punk (just listen to post-punk bands like Wire or the Pop Group)." Ok, but I wasn't talking about Post Punk. There’s a big difference between the music of Wire and that of Buzzcocks, and not just because one is crap and the other is chocolate; they are really different (like The Clash with the Sex Pistols). "I've known for years that you don't know a damn thing about what you're talking about; I absolutely do not need to reiterate that concept." Groar.
Voto:
I'll ask you the same question: And what other sensible deduction can come from what you wrote (you, above)?
Voto:
Wow, so many assumptions. I didn't write that, or maybe we all have a guilty conscience as human beings? You didn't say you were referring to me, and I didn't say I thought that. We're at that point.
Voto:
Yes, it's true, I forgot about all the reviews of House, Jazz, and World Music that you wrote. Sorry.
Voto:
"Man, what the hell are you saying? The chip shot was from Savicevic," he also made one that was absolutely magnificent from the right, if I'm not mistaken. "You must be a staunch prohibitionist, right?" In sports, yes, and your performance (performance: running, stamina, etc., class you either have or you don't) improves slightly in the short term. But after two or three years, you're nobody anymore, just like everyone, everyone, everyone from that Napoli team, except - I repeat - Ferrara. However, the issue isn't "why was he happy to score 5," the fact is he boasts of having scored 6, and that's a lie. Anyway, check out Desailly's chip shot (it's not quite a Diego chip, but damn, Desailly). <- The following year, I practically stopped watching football, but as a kid up until then, I knew dozens of line-ups by heart, statistics, and all sorts of stuff, and I had even recorded that match.
Voto:
There’s one called Grayman or Man of Gray or something like that, which is a wonderful thing, worthy of standing alongside Megalomania (from Master Of Brutality) on the podium of their best piece. More and more Rock N Roll and better with each album, the doom of the very first record is now a distant memory. Recommended in the morning for going to work, at inhuman volume.
Voto:
The Juve of Baggio & Barros, a little team? The Juve of the Germans + Vialli, a little team? Who knows, I hope for your sake you’ve only read about them in the annals and never seen them play, because that’s heresy. Those UEFA cups weren’t like the little giveaways today; they had the cream of football back then. And you’ve got three in total, just three, so I’d say those two deserve to be kissed at the altar. Moreover, despite other teams filling up with foreigners, Juve maintained for years the status of an Italian team of Italians, unlike that refugee camp that was Milan, which won yes, but when they celebrated it looked like a UNICEF party: Slavs of various origins, Africans, French, Germans, Dutch, Brazilians, Argentinians, Uruguayans... only England and Spain were missing to sing We Are The World. Juve had two Germans, a Brazilian, and a Russian if I remember correctly. The rest were all locals, and it’s also thanks to them that the national team was only eliminated on penalties in '90 and '94. Certainly not thanks to Milan (aside from their defensive superpower).