puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8016 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Can Future Days
24 aug 09
Voto:
Have you been able to review "indisturbato" (just to name one) Gentle Giant? At the time, the game was different. It used to come naturally to fill in the huge gaps; now it feels instinctive to fill in the small gaps of long-standing groups or the work of one- or two-album bands. For example – staying on the theme – Pugwash, the drummer who joined Gentle Giant during the time of Three Friends, before joining the Giant was with such “Big Sleep,” who only released one album named Bluebell something, which is really great. And no one reviews it. Just from the Gentle Giant, I can also mention three or four other groups before, during, or after Giant of the members, and all of them are worth at least a review. There are always albums to be reviewed, and there always will be.
Voto:
<< dots, in the meantime thinning out Metallica, Pink Floyd, Dream Theater doesn't seem like an enormous task... or maybe it is!!?? >> Ah, I don't do that. Enormous or not, I'd rather watch the Teletubbies.
Can Future Days
24 aug 09
Voto:
I get what you're trying to say, I just don’t agree. I’m tired of the usual records, so I’d rather have nothing. You use the verb "dovere" too often; you don’t have to clock in, I’d prefer 10 reviews a week on untapped themes than 1000 reviews of Future Days, Faust IV, Phallus Dei, UFO, and the like. I’ve never had a duplicate in my life.
Voto:
<< The situation is different if the new "old review" is lacking: at this point, I believe that a censorial intervention by the current editor wouldn't scandalize anyone. >> There was a time when everything worked that way, and many got angry. Accusations of nepotism, mafia, extortion for the sake of publication on the Homepage. Things you can’t understand until you read them. As for the "cleansing": I would be happy about it, but I wouldn't want to be in the shoes of whoever has to choose from 24046 reviews. Twenty-four thousand, it hurts. Hurts hurts hurts.
Can Future Days
24 aug 09
Voto:
"<< you must at least try to go in different directions, give new keys of interpretation >> And what, you really don't like this? It's the cover of the song by Luca Carboni, but only cultured people like me understand it. "I also bought a motorcycle, used but well-kept..."
Can Future Days
24 aug 09
Voto:
<< if we only wanted to review "immaculate" albums on Debaser, there would be these possibilities: >> Since 1974, no album by Can has been reviewed, so you had a total of ELEVEN options, including Saw Delight, which is from the same year as S.O.Babalooma (reviewed). If you're not familiar with the unreviewed albums, there's a beautiful way to save face: stay silent. Or another option: listen to them, and then write.
Voto:
<< Well done! The autobiography is posthumous. Don’t you know that posthumous books are only published to make money for the publishing houses? >> But your sister will be posthumous. The autobiography is from 2000, and he died in 2005.
Voto:
"<< And you voted for it. >> Of course. One must always remember that these are "reviews" and not "free essays," therefore if inaccuracies are written – for me – the vote is zero. And I repeat as above that if not even one piece of information is provided: neither years nor release numbers nor components, I am actually "happier."
Voto:
"Bill's brother doesn't fully play on this record" = he left halfway through the recording, which is why there was a change. Two different ways of saying the same thing. "I don't think I did it to show off" and what does that have to do with it? The discussion wasn't yours, but mine, and I just wanted to talk about the fact that by writing inaccuracies you add to the sea of errors that floods the internet, and it was only for that reason that I was correcting. To stem the tide for a moment. I contest the reviews; right now, I don’t even know what kind of user you are, what you listen to, what you like, what you've already written, if I like it, if I don't like it, if we have common tastes—I really don't know. So how can I judge? I just corrected a mistake and explained why I was correcting it, without any pretentious mental gymnastics or attacks of arrogance and various issues. I only read the bold part, not even the whole review.
Voto:
I have the Booklet, and during this album, there was a change. There are songs played by one and played by the other; I don't have time, otherwise I would scan it for you. The sites, as I was telling you, are worthless. One can quote debaser and say the worst nonsense, like that Nico was a man, that Bohemian Rhapsody is the longest song of all time, that the Melvins are not metal, and so much more.