puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7886 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
I've evolved, now even in Middle-earth, duct tape has arrived. With Frodo & Gandalf, we're causing a ruckus all over the Shire. It's a blast that you can't understand.
Voto:
...just like a Goblin Cock ripe at the perfect point.
Voto:
The new Lukin-dad, all scarves and sweaters for the cold. What a romantic image, I would say it's heartwarming.
Voto:
<< The Entombed will release the Sabbath-esque "Inferno" (2003) and the last "Serpent Saints" released in 2007 >> In between the two is Unreal Estate, which is actually my favorite.
Voto:
Your bartle seems like the result of digesting Jim's. It's incredible the telepathy that connects us, real class stuff.
Voto:
Watch out for the breadsticks, we’re too tender...
Voto:
Oh my! I can see from your avatar that old age hasn't yet gifted you with wrinkles on your lovely face.
Voto:
The term "Stoner" as a precise and well-defined genre of rock (not just the "stoner sound") began to be discussed in the '90s. Those who talk about it are ignorant. They think that even the first website created on the internet (1998 or shortly after) had an option to change the title and had purchased various domains to use the different names. Now only two domains remain: STONERROCK.COM and COSMICDOOM.COM. They are the exact same site, with two different names. Maybe you’re too young to remember these things.
Voto:
<< but they didn’t want to "institutionalize" (let's put it this way) a genre >> Again? SOUND, not genre, SOUND. Clutch play a vastly different genre from Sleep, but they both have a stoner sound. I used the words correctly; I never wrote musical genre. In my reviews, I have never put "stoner" alone, but I have always mentioned what genre it was. << You said yourself that it was Sleep (I didn’t know this, but I easily believe it) who said to make "stoner" >> I wrote IN THE EARLY 90S. You don’t read before responding. I don’t want to persuade you of anything, because as Bartleboom confirms << personally I have always associated the term stoner with a certain type of sounds (valve distortions + lowered tunings), to certain "cadences" in riffing (I think of "Thumb" on Blues or - to make a comparison almost 10 years later - to "Get It On" by Colour Haze) and to the reissue of certain "heavy rock" from the seventies >> It doesn't take a genius to understand what eight million different bands have in common.
Voto:
You're getting more and more delusional. Always remember the starting point, because you've lost it. Let me take it back and simplify it for you, so maybe you'll stop thinking nonsensically. So, you wrote: <<< The stoner can and can only be "psychedelic," >>> Well, that's an abominable nonsense. I guarantee you that, as does anyone with more than 100 records of that sound. <<< you reason (uncritically, at this point) for "indie," "grunge," "alternative," "stoner." >>> Here, it's clear that you haven't understood a damn thing about the discussion. Or maybe you don't understand what "sound" means, and you confuse it with notes, compositions, or other nonsense like attitude or spirit. Next time, propose a new unit of measurement, maybe even the meter doesn’t suit you. Think about it a bit, and you'll find the Francimeter, equal to 1.345 meters. Maybe this Francimeter, if we think it through, we can divide into thirds instead of tenths, right? If you put in some effort, you can create a whole world of your own in your tender little head. But the world will continue to use the meter.