puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7948 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Oh well, the Entombed always get 5 out of 5 on the volumes, stuff for professionals like almost all Swedish Death Metal.
Voto:
"I don't see any ambassadors or spokespeople by profession." Here I am. I carry the voice of the good and the just: I have been appointed.
Voto:
"The 'powerful' punk had started to emerge long before 1998; even the Refused began earlier. This album is merely the pinnacle and at the same time the epilogue of the matter." As much as I love Helmet, they've never made a record with such a perfect sound at such a supernatural volume. And I must mention that I have original Helmet records; I have a Swiss dub CD from them, which is definitely the best dubbing in the world, but it's still dubbing. I'm not talking about power only in the sense of properly using the bass, but also knowing how to record it. They did something powerful first, but the recording is worth half of half (and I have Flames of Discontent in the original as well).
Voto:
In fact, I was wrong; the correct word is Powerful, not decent. There are many decent sounds out there, Fugazi being the first example that comes to mind, but I've never heard anything so powerful, not even their previous works. It truly shatters windows when played on a worthy sound system—try it to believe it.
Voto:
<< to be able to say that something is not liked. >> You didn't say "I don't like it." It's written above, try re-reading yourself. It's not complicated to understand the difference between "I don't like it" and what you wrote. Just as you can criticize the choices of the managers, I can criticize your criticisms of the managers' choices. You're not the only critic on the site, I've been bothering for six years, I have experience in the field. << a single RECORD is evaluated by listening only to that. >> And a single painting is judged by looking at it. You can see all the reviewed ones, so if you want to judge, you can do it. I don't see any of the technical impediments you mentioned.
Voto:
In terms of sound, it's shamelessly Nu-Metal for me; the attitude, the themes, and the vocals are Punk or Hardcore or whatever you want, but I see this album as more similar to Deftones and early Incubus (in terms of sound) than to all the punk bands in the world. The novelty they brought was to produce punk with a decent sound, as opposed to the usual fucking lo-fi shit recorded with grandma's radio. With a good sound system and at a blood-curdling volume, it shatters the windows of yours and your neighbor’s, and the remixes included in the singles also feature excellent electronic productions (like Incubus from that period).
Voto:
Matacà, you forgot the main part: Peace, Love, Empathy, and Lemon. And then a nice popsicle.
Voto:
I believe that witnessing a painting being created is comparable to listening to a record starting from when the Maple trees are planted to make the instruments.
Voto:
"To admire Leonardo or Picasso, you have to enter a museum somewhere, but you can appreciate a good record quietly at home." But to truly appreciate the music of that record, you have to go hear it live, so it’s the same. In fact, any day you’re in Paris, the Mona Lisa is right there. Picasso will be wherever he is. Toni Iommi is who knows where the hell he is; either you go that day at that hour or forget it. If you want to hear a substitute, then just download the 3000 x 6000 jpeg of the Mona Lisa, and it’s like having "a record." Just for reasoning, I repeat that I really couldn't care less about any drawing on planet Earth.
Voto:
<< Of the artworks reviewed here, I haven't seen most of them. >> Neither have I. I don’t paint, I don’t give a damn about who paints, I like walls with washes of various colors, and I will never hang either a painting or a poster in my home. Unless you spend your free time contemplating works of painting, I don’t understand what it means that "you haven't seen most of them." But then again, excuse me, what right do you have to speak? You’ve written a couple of crap— in the main section, not the margins— about cartoons, you've been around for just a few days, and you dare to give advice, and maybe you even hope that the people in charge won’t laugh in your face? Write 300 reviews, contribute for a few years, then, perhaps, talk about "what is right to do for the site, and what is not." I, for my part, don’t even remotely allow myself to judge; I find movies disgusting too, yet I don’t say "shut this or that down," it’s their business.