puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8017 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
"Or can some people write certain things here while others cannot?" We've been telling you for three days, and you finally got there. Yes, that's exactly how it is: Here - like in all communities around the world - some can say certain things, while others - like you - cannot afford to.
Voto:
“At a sound level, it has nothing to do with that fucking nu metal, believe me.” For me, yes, I don’t believe you. “Either you don't own 'Betty' and 'Aftertaste' or you need to change your system.” I own them, and I play them on the same system I use for this, and it's not a Sony compact on sale at Unieuro. I'm not saying that Betty is "worse" than this or the other; I just say it doesn't have such a powerful sound, which isn’t a crime. I can listen to a couple of hours of Nick Drake without necessarily despairing in the futile search to blow out the speakers. Helmet doesn’t have those low frequencies, probably because they didn’t want to, preferring to come across as more "abrasive" than "powerful." And if we wanted to talk about "evaluation," I’d say I prefer any 90s Helmet album over any of the Refused or later incarnations. But we wouldn’t want to.
Voto:
If you had bothered me, I wouldn't have said anything, I just found your way of thinking disgusting, that is: "I don't give a damn about this section, so let's close it." Because first you suggested closing it, then you explained that the reason is that you don't know more than half of the reviewed works. << reason in what? >> - DeBaser is not an online newspaper but a "bulletin board" where reviews are shared - This is written everywhere. Always. It's the only law. It's not difficult to understand: SHARING. You've shared two crap about cartoons, so you can't afford to demand the closure of a space where someone shares something, even if sometimes it’s "lowbrow" because at least they share. And sometimes they share great things, as far as I know. And yes, before you allow yourself to pass judgment on a community - of any kind - you should really engage with that community. And it seems to me that you are a damn nobody here (like me, who indeed cannot judge anything other than the contents and the users).
Voto:
Oh well, the Entombed always get 5 out of 5 on the volumes, stuff for professionals like almost all Swedish Death Metal.
Voto:
"I don't see any ambassadors or spokespeople by profession." Here I am. I carry the voice of the good and the just: I have been appointed.
Voto:
"The 'powerful' punk had started to emerge long before 1998; even the Refused began earlier. This album is merely the pinnacle and at the same time the epilogue of the matter." As much as I love Helmet, they've never made a record with such a perfect sound at such a supernatural volume. And I must mention that I have original Helmet records; I have a Swiss dub CD from them, which is definitely the best dubbing in the world, but it's still dubbing. I'm not talking about power only in the sense of properly using the bass, but also knowing how to record it. They did something powerful first, but the recording is worth half of half (and I have Flames of Discontent in the original as well).
Voto:
In fact, I was wrong; the correct word is Powerful, not decent. There are many decent sounds out there, Fugazi being the first example that comes to mind, but I've never heard anything so powerful, not even their previous works. It truly shatters windows when played on a worthy sound system—try it to believe it.
Voto:
<< to be able to say that something is not liked. >> You didn't say "I don't like it." It's written above, try re-reading yourself. It's not complicated to understand the difference between "I don't like it" and what you wrote. Just as you can criticize the choices of the managers, I can criticize your criticisms of the managers' choices. You're not the only critic on the site, I've been bothering for six years, I have experience in the field. << a single RECORD is evaluated by listening only to that. >> And a single painting is judged by looking at it. You can see all the reviewed ones, so if you want to judge, you can do it. I don't see any of the technical impediments you mentioned.
Voto:
In terms of sound, it's shamelessly Nu-Metal for me; the attitude, the themes, and the vocals are Punk or Hardcore or whatever you want, but I see this album as more similar to Deftones and early Incubus (in terms of sound) than to all the punk bands in the world. The novelty they brought was to produce punk with a decent sound, as opposed to the usual fucking lo-fi shit recorded with grandma's radio. With a good sound system and at a blood-curdling volume, it shatters the windows of yours and your neighbor’s, and the remixes included in the singles also feature excellent electronic productions (like Incubus from that period).
Voto:
Matacà, you forgot the main part: Peace, Love, Empathy, and Lemon. And then a nice popsicle.