puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,44 • DeAge™ : 7947 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
<< On par with Ungaretti and Vittorio Sgarbi >> Ungaretti was a bit of a fraud, he wasn't exactly a master of rhyme, indeed, he took quite a few liberties. Vittorio Sgarbi, even as a modern poet, is cooler; his diss tracks from back in the day put the feud between the former NWA to shame.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Alright Steve, but you reason, give examples, talk bullshit, and discuss the drunken wives and side issues but you don’t talk about music. You can't get out of the "I like vs I don't like" loop, and you fail to understand that by doing this, you are not saying anything meaningful. Discussing music doesn’t mean letting us know what you like; we don’t give a damn about whether you like this or that. In order not to be taken for a fool, you should know how to describe an album a bit better than "that’s the crossover I like, this one a bit less." << if someone has a different idea of crossover than his, then they're an idiot. >> It's an idiot who can't explain their idea, like you. You belong to Ondarock, not Debaser.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Well, I have to say I extremely admire Zack De La Rocha, I find his timbre very charismatic, his flow convinces me, and as a frontman and character, Zacarias is very expressive. He is the best rapper in history, and also the best poet since 1900. The fact that they don't have anything to do with Mr. Bungle doesn't mean they are lacking. And the rhythm section is ridiculous because that's how it should be; with a good rhythm section, you would send Zack to waste and his flow wouldn't convince you at all. Off-tempo rap pieces are always exercises in style, it's too difficult to fit time and meaning for more than twenty seconds, it's physiological to go off track either with the rhythm or with the words.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Yes, yes, okay. I'll make it easier for you, for the slow ones: tell me what you find incorrect here: Bungle vs RATM, since the former is based on tons of notes and syncopations with a crazy rhythm section and is seasoned by a fairly versatile singer (certainly not the Patton of ten years later) who spits out tons of nonsense, while the latter relies on much simpler and more impactful music, with a ridiculous rhythm section (because you can’t have a decent rhythm section if you want to rap) garnished by a rapper who doesn’t sing and believes that meaning is the main part of his pieces. For me, it's not that they can't be compared; they don't even relate to each other at all. /// Not having enough brain to propose a thought of your own, you can criticize mine. Please, make us laugh before 5 PM.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
If I had you as an older brother, we would have conquered the world.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
<< I don't like Ondarock at all >> Good. I was talking about the one from RATM.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
For Primus, I would say that at least the second part is quite "crossover." I still don’t understand Bungle vs RATM, given that the former relies on tons of notes and offbeats with a crazy rhythm section, spiced up by a fairly versatile singer (who is certainly not the Patton of ten years later) shooting out tons of nonsensical bullshit, while the latter is based on much simpler and impactful music, with a ridiculous rhythm section (because you can’t have a decent rhythm section if you want to rap) seasoned by a rapper who doesn’t sing and believes that meaning is the main part of his tracks. For me, it’s not that they can’t be compared; they just don’t really have anything to do with each other.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
"<< Why do you use the plural, that I made for you? :( >> It's me and you’re dots. << that I made for you? >> It seems to me nothing."
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
"<< here comes the sermon about genres and sub-genres. >> They’re convinced they’re on Onda Rock, where you can afford to say “nice” and walk away. They don’t realize they’ve ended up on the most meticulous site on the net, where you throw a stone and they cut your hand."
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
"Excuse me, but do you do drugs?" Because, the Led Zeppelin don't? "Then two albums are comparable." So COMPARE them. Give us some points, even just one. I don’t know, similar rhythmic sections, comparable sounds, themes in the lyrics… something that clearly indicates belonging to a MUSIC genre. I find common points between Metallica and Megadeth, because both played Bay Area Thrash Metal. Between RATM and Bungle, I find nothing, so enlighten us, you who don’t do drugs, like Laura Pausini.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7336

gianmarco86

DeRank™: 0,00

ZiOn

DeRank™: 19,19

Badi

DeAge 7100

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

Hal

DeRank™: 9,08

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione