puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8159 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
24 jul 10
Voto:
Okay, you're right, you understood my point while I'm the one who's not understanding my own. It happens to me to not understand myself; sometimes the dots disagree for days. I hadn't realized that my intention was to define "crossover," sorry.
Rage Against The Machine Evil Empire
Rage Against The Machine Evil Empire
24 jul 10
Voto:
Of course, when I say "the genre 'metal' didn't exist, only 'heavy metal'" I mean the ones to select when you write the review. Because, with you, you never know.
Rage Against The Machine Evil Empire
Rage Against The Machine Evil Empire
24 jul 10
Voto:
"Why is it referred to as crossover here?" Because the genre "metal" didn't exist, just "heavy metal," so I often preferred to leave it blank or use something else; the term Rap Heavy Metal disgusted me. You were hurt, huh, you idiot?
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
24 jul 10
Voto:
You haven't understood the final meaning of the speech. You're a human case, I can recognize them right away. The point isn't "this is crossover, the other isn't." The point is that RATM have nothing to do with Bungle, and it's impossible to compare them. In fact, precisely because it's impossible to compare them, you've been going on since yesterday about "reasoning based on a word," namely the term crossover. But since you're not Aeneas, you don't even have the skills to attempt a planetary omelette maneuver like that. I recognize human cases. By profession.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
24 jul 10
Voto:
blah blah blah
Margaret Bourke-White Gandhi
Margaret Bourke-White Gandhi
24 jul 10
Voto:
Geeno is the slowest person I have ever met. It's something that can't be described.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
<< On par with Ungaretti and Vittorio Sgarbi >> Ungaretti was a bit of a fraud, he wasn't exactly a master of rhyme, indeed, he took quite a few liberties. Vittorio Sgarbi, even as a modern poet, is cooler; his diss tracks from back in the day put the feud between the former NWA to shame.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Alright Steve, but you reason, give examples, talk bullshit, and discuss the drunken wives and side issues but you don’t talk about music. You can't get out of the "I like vs I don't like" loop, and you fail to understand that by doing this, you are not saying anything meaningful. Discussing music doesn’t mean letting us know what you like; we don’t give a damn about whether you like this or that. In order not to be taken for a fool, you should know how to describe an album a bit better than "that’s the crossover I like, this one a bit less." << if someone has a different idea of crossover than his, then they're an idiot. >> It's an idiot who can't explain their idea, like you. You belong to Ondarock, not Debaser.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Well, I have to say I extremely admire Zack De La Rocha, I find his timbre very charismatic, his flow convinces me, and as a frontman and character, Zacarias is very expressive. He is the best rapper in history, and also the best poet since 1900. The fact that they don't have anything to do with Mr. Bungle doesn't mean they are lacking. And the rhythm section is ridiculous because that's how it should be; with a good rhythm section, you would send Zack to waste and his flow wouldn't convince you at all. Off-tempo rap pieces are always exercises in style, it's too difficult to fit time and meaning for more than twenty seconds, it's physiological to go off track either with the rhythm or with the words.
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
Mr. Bungle Mr. Bungle
23 jul 10
Voto:
Yes, yes, okay. I'll make it easier for you, for the slow ones: tell me what you find incorrect here: Bungle vs RATM, since the former is based on tons of notes and syncopations with a crazy rhythm section and is seasoned by a fairly versatile singer (certainly not the Patton of ten years later) who spits out tons of nonsense, while the latter relies on much simpler and more impactful music, with a ridiculous rhythm section (because you can’t have a decent rhythm section if you want to rap) garnished by a rapper who doesn’t sing and believes that meaning is the main part of his pieces. For me, it's not that they can't be compared; they don't even relate to each other at all. /// Not having enough brain to propose a thought of your own, you can criticize mine. Please, make us laugh before 5 PM.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7548

gianmarco86

DeRank™: 0,00

ZiOn

DeRank™: 19,12

Badi

DeAge 7312

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

Hal

DeRank™: 9,08

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione