puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7885 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
That's not a "genre," it's a TAG. TAGs are meant to help find reviews organized in a certain way, and since I didn't have Rap Metal, I knew very well that many call it Crossover, so I tagged it that way. It's pointless to insist; I couldn't do as I wanted, so I was forced. But why are you so stupid to spend hours talking about terms and tags? What joy does it bring you to come to a music site and discuss the technical philosophy that governs it? It's like someone on a soccer forum only talking about the number of steps at Old Trafford, or how fast the Inter minibus goes from 0 to 100. Okay, it's still soccer, but...
Voto:
Ah, so we’ve actually reached the point where I didn’t ask you a question, but you asked one to me. And here I was thinking you were waiting for a comparison between two albums, how silly of me. I was the one who should have explained. Anyway, I've explained several times what I mean by Crossover, so sift through my comments; at the very least, there are also theories that disagree across the various years they were written. In theory, it’s you, with four or five hundred comments and zero reviews, who should explain your point of view. Try looking through comments from duemilaquattrocentotrentaquattro to settemilatrecentoventinove, you’ll find what you’re looking for.
Voto:
Okay, you're right, you understood my point while I'm the one who's not understanding my own. It happens to me to not understand myself; sometimes the dots disagree for days. I hadn't realized that my intention was to define "crossover," sorry.
Voto:
Of course, when I say "the genre 'metal' didn't exist, only 'heavy metal'" I mean the ones to select when you write the review. Because, with you, you never know.
Voto:
"Why is it referred to as crossover here?" Because the genre "metal" didn't exist, just "heavy metal," so I often preferred to leave it blank or use something else; the term Rap Heavy Metal disgusted me. You were hurt, huh, you idiot?
Voto:
You haven't understood the final meaning of the speech. You're a human case, I can recognize them right away. The point isn't "this is crossover, the other isn't." The point is that RATM have nothing to do with Bungle, and it's impossible to compare them. In fact, precisely because it's impossible to compare them, you've been going on since yesterday about "reasoning based on a word," namely the term crossover. But since you're not Aeneas, you don't even have the skills to attempt a planetary omelette maneuver like that. I recognize human cases. By profession.
Voto:
blah blah blah
Voto:
Geeno is the slowest person I have ever met. It's something that can't be described.
Voto:
<< On par with Ungaretti and Vittorio Sgarbi >> Ungaretti was a bit of a fraud, he wasn't exactly a master of rhyme, indeed, he took quite a few liberties. Vittorio Sgarbi, even as a modern poet, is cooler; his diss tracks from back in the day put the feud between the former NWA to shame.
Voto:
Alright Steve, but you reason, give examples, talk bullshit, and discuss the drunken wives and side issues but you don’t talk about music. You can't get out of the "I like vs I don't like" loop, and you fail to understand that by doing this, you are not saying anything meaningful. Discussing music doesn’t mean letting us know what you like; we don’t give a damn about whether you like this or that. In order not to be taken for a fool, you should know how to describe an album a bit better than "that’s the crossover I like, this one a bit less." << if someone has a different idea of crossover than his, then they're an idiot. >> It's an idiot who can't explain their idea, like you. You belong to Ondarock, not Debaser.