puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,39
DeAge™ : 8242 days • Here since 21 october 2003
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
“Where is it written that I cannot express my opinion?” Eh, really, where is it written? I didn’t write that. I wrote something different, which means something different, which I already explained a little post above. “When reviewing a novel by an author, do you necessarily have to know all the rest of their works?” When reviewing a Literary Novel, not necessarily. When reviewing a Greatest Hits Christmas of Books of Protest, yes. Novels have nothing to do with it. “As for punctuation, I suggest you get a nice pair of glasses if you can’t see it.” No no, don’t worry, I can see you perfectly fluttering over our heads, Eagle.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
You are shameless.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
Oh, he's not angry, he's just wild. There are no more human cases like there used to be.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
Fuck, but geenoo has written THREE REVIEWS! Ah, about books.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
<< If someone wants to talk about things they don't know, that's their problem; they'll be criticized. >> Well, that's what I meant by "you can afford it." I said it because it's clearly noticeable that you're pissed off (no spaces, missing periods...).
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
Alright. You've been here for years and you don't have a single record at home, so coming from you it means nothing.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
Anyway, I didn't mean to offend you. I wrote that you were watching Pokémon to imply that you might be too young. I didn't say that in kindergarten I was reading Marx's Das Kapital. The point is: are you sure you can afford to come here and talk about labor? I don't think so, for various reasons and not because of any "fault" of yours.
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
<< "I know Travaglio longer than you do, gnè gnè!" >> I wrote "If someone has the cornerstones of Travaglio at home," because I know that many here have them, as I understood you didn't. << I review whatever I want, okay? >> And I have the same freedom to criticize, okay? << Even a Christmas greatest hits that comes into my hands, >> Then say it’s a Christmas Greatest Hits. Otherwise, you confuse the future user of the work. You're still recommending a purchase, these aren’t CDs you can download. << many congratulations on your possession of the old releases by Travaglio >> I repeat that I talked about "someone who possesses," I didn't specify "the one." << of which no one asked you >> And who asked you what you thought of Ad Personam? Did they send you an email from the White House? << and of which you cannot know if others have it or not. >> I can’t know, but I can do 2 + 2. << By the way, I still have to remind you that your know-it-all attitude really makes you look comical when not pathetic. >> This sentence means nothing. << The merit of having discovered hot water >> Detective Journalist, did I write that?
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
Araya, all it took was for me to point out that you don't know who you're talking about, for you to already eliminate the space after the punctuation and reduce the ellipsis from three to two dots. Maybe that means I was right? ahahaha
Marco Travaglio Ad personam
Voto:
20 years ago, he was 26 and a bit young to be chatting about certain things. At 31 (15 years ago), he was already making his mark with "Il Pollaio Delle Libertà."