puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8019 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Well, we agree. What I meant to say is that, not considering myself slow and not seeing this as a gathering of fools, this review that peddles it as a newly discovered Gnostic gospel from the ruins of the moat surrounding Nazareth was a bit... how should I put it... crap. I'm the kind of person who still checks "how many reviews are there of the artist in the database". There’s hardly anything by Travaglio, just a live report from Sfascia and this. You can't let Ondarock think that we’ve just discovered Travaglio on debaser, come on. Then the book definitely has its usefulness, and I also say that it's perfectly fine for Travaglio to sell like crazy from a mass information standpoint, that goes without saying.
Voto:
It must be said, however, that it's the album with the most content ERRP | Expired Registration Recovery Policy
Voto:
Yes, I was joking to keep the biblical tones necessary when discussing Italians par excellence. Many, however, do not buy 1978, precisely because it is quite clear it is one step below; it is certain that from that step below, it cannot piss on the rest of Italy because from that height, the piss evaporates first.
Voto:
“Where is it written that I cannot express my opinion?” Eh, really, where is it written? I didn’t write that. I wrote something different, which means something different, which I already explained a little post above. “When reviewing a novel by an author, do you necessarily have to know all the rest of their works?” When reviewing a Literary Novel, not necessarily. When reviewing a Greatest Hits Christmas of Books of Protest, yes. Novels have nothing to do with it. “As for punctuation, I suggest you get a nice pair of glasses if you can’t see it.” No no, don’t worry, I can see you perfectly fluttering over our heads, Eagle.
Voto:
You are shameless.
Voto:
Oh, he's not angry, he's just wild. There are no more human cases like there used to be.
Voto:
Fuck, but geenoo has written THREE REVIEWS! Ah, about books.
Voto:
<< If someone wants to talk about things they don't know, that's their problem; they'll be criticized. >> Well, that's what I meant by "you can afford it." I said it because it's clearly noticeable that you're pissed off (no spaces, missing periods...).
Voto:
Alright. You've been here for years and you don't have a single record at home, so coming from you it means nothing.
Voto:
Anyway, I didn't mean to offend you. I wrote that you were watching Pokémon to imply that you might be too young. I didn't say that in kindergarten I was reading Marx's Das Kapital. The point is: are you sure you can afford to come here and talk about labor? I don't think so, for various reasons and not because of any "fault" of yours.