puntiniCAZpuntini

<< Lobotomy and punctuations the traveling theater of nonsense is almost complete. >> Ah, I’m the one spouting nonsense? Bro, you wrote that Hip Hop is a musical genre, and not content with that, you added that it’s different from Rap. That’s nonsense, I pointed it out to you and you act as if nothing happened. Then you took an album from someone who only talks about women and how great he is in his perfect world, and you wrote that the guy is disgusted. That’s nonsense, I pointed it out to you and you act as if nothing happened. Then you picked an album from someone who is anti-drugs and pro-religion, and you wrote that he’s angry and Gangsta. Someone who sponsors religion and no-drugs, Gangsta. That’s nonsense, but you don’t respond to the points, you just stick to being Gangsta with me. Not to mention adjectives like “dark, psychedelic, and confusing” slapped onto a Rap album. West doesn’t appeal to me, but I can understand who might like it; it’s not bad. Yet you didn’t write “I like West,” you wrote a ton of immense nonsense that means you don’t know English, you have no idea where Rap comes from, and you write reviews finding adjectives you like by randomly selecting from a predefined list. You review a rapper without knowing what he’s talking about, and you expect applause? This is a music site, and your review is full of objective bullshit, beyond “I like it / I don’t like it,” those are bullshit. If you don’t think so, enlighten me; maybe it’s me who doesn’t have the ear of the past and confuses “pussy” with “gun” and “sex” with “murda.”

Oh Anarchj, why are you giving a thumbs down? Explain to me the peculiarities of the "rap music genre" and those of the "hip hop music genre" then. You can't just give thumbs down and walk away; come on, a bit of decorum at least during Christmas.

<< In a distant era, Rap and Hip Hop were born. Two musical genres >> Enough, it's 2011. This isn't just a one-time thing; it's a lifetime review license suspension. And on a review of Kanye West, of all things, no, really, no. On Christmas Day, too. I’ll leave aside the adjectives to describe "the dark part of the album" (!), the first sentence is more than enough. Darius must die; create a fake identity that has never heard Black Music and return cleansed of sin in the new year.

Piè, why haven't you reviewed "Cento e uno modi per comprendere il Caz" yet? It can't be missing from your list of punished books. Anyway, I see you've closed down fake accounts, blogs, cartoons, fake reviewers of reviewed blogs, and all that... but you never lack the time to read me; It's tough, most of the time you're not interested in the topics, but here you are, always faithful. I read that you have a lot of issues, and I also read that in the end, you followed my advice to admit your slight imbalance. I'm happy, really. Nice Piè, take care of those issues well, please. At Christmas, suicides are a daily occurrence, be careful.

"If Roosevelt sanctions the bank," And see that you've arrived at the point I was making? The bank, not THE PERSON OF PRESCOTT BUSH as you mentioned above. The bank continued to exist; it was just given a slap on the wrist. We're saying the same thing, but I'm still debating the first post where it says CONDEMNATION of PRESCOTT BUSH. He wasn’t condemned to do anything, he. "I wouldn't be surprised if Prescott comes out rewarded and revered." So, you see, they didn't condemn him! Huh.

Look, from Wikipedia (not exactly something major) -> "The order only cited the Union Banking Corporation (UBC), of which Bush was an executive and owned a single share." Owning or being president was different for them. So it's not true that an Executive has responsibility (at least, at the time). The excuse was that the treaty I'm talking about was a week after the attack on P. Harbor, so everything boiled down to "well, when we started we were friends, we didn't predict the future," and Roosevelt told Bush, "okay, buddy, but don’t do it again, alright!" And the son and grandson became Presidents.