puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,44 • DeAge™ : 8020 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
12 mar 11
Voto:
And then Nes, forgive me, but your link to someone who doesn't know the genre says nothing, as Ikonnikvcore has assimilated it (I believe, I suppose, maybe) to what they usually listen to; to another person it might sound like "pop with heavy distortion played only with string and percussion instruments." That's why we have "genres" and "subgenres," to help someone understand what we're talking about in three words. Otherwise, we might as well just create one big playlist where everyone drops their YouTube links, especially because this album loses 70% of its beauty since it sounds like shit.
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
12 mar 11
Voto:
I don't understand why you're here if you don't want to talk about the proposed albums, and every time someone tries to say that another has perhaps, wrongly, they become "sly provocations." Is it practically illegal to say that someone is talking nonsense? Then it makes no sense to keep the comments open if they all have to be "great album" or "I don't know it, nice cover so I'll look it up." I increasingly notice that many people confuse "kindness" with "who cares, let them say what they want"; there's nothing wrong with that, but then the site loses all its meaning. And then everyone attacks Facebook, when basically this has become a Facebook where instead of sharing messages of love and nonsense, we share albums. "Slow hardcore" in 2006 would have sparked at least 200 laughing comments, which were (are) the true beauty of the site. Talking nonsense, but with a purpose.
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
12 mar 11
Voto:
<< you lack a sense of humor, >> In theory it's a site that talks about music, not just a place to "recommend," and besides, no one forces you to give "references" to the album you recommend << of imagination, >> What does that have to do with it? << your breath stinks >> True. << I don’t know who Scaruffi is... >> Who put the link to "more info"? << a simple "hardcore" would be perfect, because there’s so much of it here, it's just leeeeeento! >> Are you serious about this?
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
10 mar 11
Voto:
PPPPS: I just saw that you're referencing Scaruffi... that's why you're so confused...
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
10 mar 11
Voto:
Ah, okay, discone.
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
10 mar 11
Voto:
PS: the Jesus Lizard are not millions of km away from Nightstick, but there are six - maybe even seven - million bands that are more similar. Type "doom" in the Degeneri search, any group there is certainly more akin to Nightstick than to the Jesus Lizard.
Nightstick Blotter
Nightstick Blotter
10 mar 11
Voto:
"It's not so easy to talk about their music." I believe it, if you start from Hardcore to describe an album that is clearly Metal. That "old school hardcore" among the genres is ugly to see, and it’s misleading as well. It would have sufficed to say "it's one of the earliest Stoner Doom records, where Stoner reigns supreme bringing some tracks into the madness," and that would have been it, easy peasy. I don’t have Hardcore records at home and I never will, so don’t go around saying that Nightstick is Hardcore: you offend me.
Marco Bellocchio Sbatti il mostro in prima pagina
Marco Bellocchio Sbatti il mostro in prima pagina
2 mar 11
Voto:
The only genre of film that I can watch, and the best actor in the history of planet Earth. Congratulations on the review, maybe you could have told us that La Russa appears at the beginning.
Radiohead The King Of Limbs
Radiohead The King Of Limbs
24 feb 11
Voto:
Ah wait before you respond "well, but you read me!", I want to emphasize that I obviously only read the bold parts (which are the same as all the bold parts from when years ago you tried to tear something down, provoking general hilarity).
Radiohead The King Of Limbs
Radiohead The King Of Limbs
24 feb 11
Voto:
The funniest thing about the sick cartoonist is that when he tears something apart, he uses comparisons like "already heard," comparing them to other albums that were also "already heard," and especially when he likes something, it's NEVER and I mean NEVER something innovative. In fact, when he reviews something truly innovative like Doo Bop & 100th Windows, he tears it apart, talking about missteps and how things were better before. He never "closes" a line of reasoning without contradicting himself, not even for a million euros. Get a fake life and stop talking about music, because you really have never had any decent points; you’ve worn us out with nonsensical phrases like "already heard" and "lacks inspiration," and all the other nonsense from your repertoire.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7409

dominus_sathanas

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

_Teskyo_

DeRank™: 0,00

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

Badi

DeAge 7173

Workhorse

DeRank™: 6,75

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione