puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7883 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
<< to be reassessed >> It has sold over twenty million copies, it has been printed in every format time and time again, an original first edition is valued at over 5,000 Euros, two pieces included in it are among the most played by the Floyd around the world and therefore still a source of income for the band. Nick Mason said a few years ago - when talking about his cars - that just with One Of These Days he could have bought a 1962 GTO-250 (which he later sold for about 10 million pounds). What does "to be reassessed" mean? Please explain it to me, I'm serious.
Voto:
I'm sorry, but I can't access external links or content from YouTube. If you can provide the text you'd like translated, I'd be happy to help!
Voto:
I’m getting older, it wasn’t Woodstock but the Isle of Wight.
Voto:
I had forgotten about McLaughlin; nobody ever talks about him in the DVDs and books about those three days. Maybe he felt strange and stayed silent for 72 straight hours, like Dave Holland at Woodstock, who looks like he just came out of a frontal lobotomy. They don’t make L'ellessedì like they used to.
Voto:
...And then where does he mention Electric Wizard? I swear I searched but I didn’t see the name.
Voto:
And then Nes, forgive me, but your link to someone who doesn't know the genre says nothing, as Ikonnikvcore has assimilated it (I believe, I suppose, maybe) to what they usually listen to; to another person it might sound like "pop with heavy distortion played only with string and percussion instruments." That's why we have "genres" and "subgenres," to help someone understand what we're talking about in three words. Otherwise, we might as well just create one big playlist where everyone drops their YouTube links, especially because this album loses 70% of its beauty since it sounds like shit.
Voto:
I don't understand why you're here if you don't want to talk about the proposed albums, and every time someone tries to say that another has perhaps, wrongly, they become "sly provocations." Is it practically illegal to say that someone is talking nonsense? Then it makes no sense to keep the comments open if they all have to be "great album" or "I don't know it, nice cover so I'll look it up." I increasingly notice that many people confuse "kindness" with "who cares, let them say what they want"; there's nothing wrong with that, but then the site loses all its meaning. And then everyone attacks Facebook, when basically this has become a Facebook where instead of sharing messages of love and nonsense, we share albums. "Slow hardcore" in 2006 would have sparked at least 200 laughing comments, which were (are) the true beauty of the site. Talking nonsense, but with a purpose.
Voto:
<< you lack a sense of humor, >> In theory it's a site that talks about music, not just a place to "recommend," and besides, no one forces you to give "references" to the album you recommend << of imagination, >> What does that have to do with it? << your breath stinks >> True. << I don’t know who Scaruffi is... >> Who put the link to "more info"? << a simple "hardcore" would be perfect, because there’s so much of it here, it's just leeeeeento! >> Are you serious about this?
Voto:
PPPPS: I just saw that you're referencing Scaruffi... that's why you're so confused...
Voto:
Ah, okay, discone.