puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank : 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7883 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
Voto:
Ah ok. So I say before Geeno that it was nonsense, then Geeno comes to tell me "but isn't it nonsense?" and you give him a sponge. Why do you sponge someone who asks something to another who just affirmed the same thing? What’s your measure for giving someone a sponge, is it reassessment?
Voto:
"I believe, but I could be wrong." So why say it in the first place?
Voto:
Geeno, as usual, you arrive late. At least you found the right comment. Darkeve, on the other hand, did not. << Tell us a bit about that other unknown band >> Why did I write that the Floyd are "to be reconsidered"?
Voto:
But do you listen to experimental records for enjoyment or for pleasure? Can you really make yourself like a Von Shirac record, or do you just want (as many do) to gather ideas for things to incorporate into your tracks? Just out of curiosity, since I had never "met" someone so "attached" to experimenters like you, especially not someone I would have ever expected this from, a techno-obsessed person.
Voto:
And anyway, that it sold more than The Wall is a bullshit I made up on the spot (maybe it's true) but I wanted to read you writing, "Of course it sold more than 'The Wall'!" Sure, bullcrap, you don't know that.
Voto:
"I don't understand where the problem is." Neither do I. I don’t see any problems. The term seemed silly to me. "You can be sure that if you ask ten people at the bar under your house or under mine (what's the difference? Or maybe the bar under your house is frequented by illustrious intellectuals?) about Pink Floyd, 9 will mention 'The Wall' or 'Dark Side,'" BULLSHIT INTERGALACTIC. Right at the bar, 44 out of 47 will respond: DON DO DO DO DOOON DOOOON DDDODDDO.....DDDAAAAN! WOOOEEEO WIO WAOOOO... because football reigns in all bars.
Voto:
"Music isn't something I read about in history books; I listen to it." They were discussing an Italian term used improperly to describe a historical fact (the possible underestimation of Meddle), and that’s where "the music that’s inside" doesn't really matter in this conversation. It can be wonderful or not; it has nothing to do with it. If you say to me, "Well, I don't care at all about the history of music," then don't join the discussion; it's rude. Anyway, you've heard Meddle a ton of times without knowing it, a piece here and a piece there, but you've heard it.
Voto:
(Not to mention that after this the first Greatest Hits have also been released)
Voto:
Then oh, if at the bar around the corner they talk more about Animals, I take it all back.
Voto:
<< It's just that compared to other works by the Floyd, it is undoubtedly talked about less, proportionately. >> No, it's actually the one that is talked about the most after Dark Side, at least in music history books regarding sales and success. It's no coincidence that after this, they did immense tours, the live at Pompeii, and above all, they decided they loved the money made from it, so Dark Side came to light. Maybe today we talk more about The Wall, but this one sold disproportionately more.