puntiniCAZpuntini

DeRank ™: 14,42 • DeAge™ : 7881 days

Love
  • Contact
  • Here since 21 october 2003
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
1) "The band playing outside your house also does three live shows," unless there’s the EMI under your house (besides the river where you fish for carp), the theme "everyone does three live shows" is yours, not mine. What jokes have to do with this is known only to your impaired brain. 2) Oh, me? Where did I write that they only made one album? You're completely idiotic, believe me. The live shows are always three, two previous to this, one subsequent. You're idiotic, you don’t understand. 3) Yes. 4) It raises expectations for those who know the two names as the two names and how they were positioned in 1971, and since I mentioned those two names and specified the date, those are expectations that come back, hearing this. If someone is an idiot and reads two names and a date and thinks of Pink Floyd's Animals, that's their problem. Remember to answer point two, where you read that they only made one album, that’s known only to you, and the bands outside your house who have released three live shows.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
Oh, I almost forgot, besides saying a giant bullshit with "they don't surpass the first album" and then they made ten, also "subsequently they immediately vanished" I'm sorry but that's bullshit too, this album is from the mid-career, after this they made three more (and a live one).
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
<< What does it take to record and release three live albums? >> People have to buy the first one, then the second, and then the third. Not new material, just live performances. Clearly, it doesn't seem like a big deal to some. Find me some shitty band that has released three live albums, come on. One that "nobody knows," as you say.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
"If I had written: 'that little disk, you know'... no, you brought out Morrison and Barrett!" Your problem is that you read in bits. I wrote "if that day Morrison," meaning the day he died, beautifully drunk and high as a kite, had entered the room with Barrett (who that day was already thoroughly under treatment, full of every wonderful thing that pharmaceutical companies produce), they would have come out with a CD like this. But your little head reads "Barrett & Morrison" and thinks "better than the Floyd plus the Doors with a dollop of cream!" I, however, wrote something else, very specific, but your neurons keep banging their heads and repeating "Pink Floyd! Pink Floyd! Riders on the Storm!...". No, there's no Riders On The Storm here, nor Echoes. I don’t think Opel is an album that has sold like crazy at the top of all charts, despite having had forty times the publicity of this one. And after just two albums, Barrett was done. Morrison didn’t even make one, just think about it. Two little tunes then, on planet Geenoo.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
"These guys are practically dead": you wrote that. And you didn't understand what I was referring to, nor the mood of the comment that meant "too bad, now the band is focusing more on Low-Fi stuff." "It's weak because if a group or project can't even release one album..." They have put out 7, plus three live albums (pressed and everything), plus two cover EPs. They've all sold enough to allow them to live off music for 15 years, and a scene (the Danish one, since they are among the first) that is dedicated to these sounds. But you haven't even heard the album, you don't even know who On Trial are, and you talk. For you, a project that releases THREE live albums is weak? A project that has performed multiple times at festivals around the world is weak? A project that spawned another 4/5 bands still active is weak? Yes, for you it is weak because the singer and the first guitarist got fed up. Well then. The planet Genoo offers this and much more.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
"You wrote that they are dead and no longer around." No, both because it’s not true and because I wrote something else; then I also explained it to you again, but you’re being stupid and insisting. "You were way off, that project was arietta." And how do you deduce that? You didn’t hear it, you didn’t understand the references, you didn’t grasp what I said... it was arietta because they’ve exceeded the age where you spend a lot of time and money making records? Was it arietta because they don’t do like AC/DC who keep releasing the same album since the '80s? Was it arietta because they don’t go on MTV? Why Arietta? Explain to us.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
You didn't answer my question, and you keep asking more.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
Don't distract Bartle, he's thinking. And you know how much effort it costs him.
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
Tell me, I won't answer what you're asking if you don't answer first, it's not just you who asks questions. You started the conversation with a rather incomprehensible question, so don’t ask for explanations from others: why do you think they should still be around? On the planet geenoo, do bands never get old?
On Trial New Day Rising
On Trial New Day Rising
30 aug 11
Voto:
Yes, change the subject. << having exaggerated a bit >> The confirmation that you didn’t understand my references at all. In my opinion, you’ve never listened to a Barrett album, nor have you ever bothered to try to understand what the hell Morrison was actually doing in the Doors. If I had written "Pink Floyd + Doors," but I wrote something else. It's just that, as usual, you can’t grasp it. And you change the subject.
Similar users
egr

DeRank™: 0,05

dark_kingdom

DeRank™: 0,00

Den Vlaams

DeRank™: -3,12

EarlGrey

DeAge 7269

gianmarco86

DeRank™: 0,00

ZiOn

DeRank™: 25,46

Badi

DeAge 7033

M@ynardJamesKeen@n

DeRank™: 0,00

I_lOVE_mUSIc 

DeRank™: 0,06

Hal

DeRank™: 9,08

Groups
zzo_guardi Grunged Cartuns Comindeb SantoNatal ScieMenZiaTi Raggruppatore W_I_NEGRI Cactus DeSarder RadioDelirio Electroma Fante Championship Tutausend Supercazzolaro
Rewards
october 2003
october 2004
february 2005
week 42 - 2003
week 44 - 2003
week 2 - 2004
week 13 - 2004
week 28 - 2004
week 40 - 2004
week 6 - 2005
week 10 - 2005
week 11 - 2005
week 13 - 2005
week 29 - 2005
week 15 - 2006
week 42 - 2007
Gran Visir -la recensione