Motoko

The last will never be first, but in retrospect they are often much more interesting. I definitely look for these; from what little I've heard, they resonate with me.

Madonna what a long wait.
I’ll have to come back to read everything, but I have no doubts about the product… Thank you regardless.

In here, you’re almost one of a kind for the way you express yourself and say what you think. Provocative to the extreme: "To face adversaries who wallow in absolute evil, the paradisiacal side cannot present itself to battle with a 'bouquet of flowers': you seek out trouble, and I almost fell off my chair with the doubt of 'serious or joking' that would grip even the most experienced. But you already know that.

From how you describe the album, I expected much worse, but it is indeed a heavy weight without crossing the boundary into pure chaos. Let’s stay within the realm of the audible and a positivity without sarcasm (as per the description); we like this joy of false constructive wickedness, but only halfway. The explosion is missing (from what I've heard so far), and that creates a lot of tension.

A nice proposal.

Beautiful. Everything.
The director has managed to convey the deep meaning of ritual (in its sense of empathy and sharing among the members of the community); this aspect is only hinted at in his first film (which I consider inferior), but in this film, he reaches remarkable heights. I didn't find it boring at all; the initial slowness is just a device to give the finale the right delirious emphasis—no extra scenes, in fact, time flew by. It glued me to my seat, and I watched the finale almost standing up.
I await the next film: I too think it could be a masterpiece, the premises are excellent.
Magnificent recommendation, even though I’m sure I enjoyed it more than you did. And I thank the persistent chatter of some comments above that led me to watch it, even though I almost risked ruining the film; it was quite a struggle to avoid letting my eyes wander to the discussion… damn spoiler!

The ad minchiam use of spaces and punctuation gives me skin rashes. They in 1980 were so much further ahead of you in 2021... Realize it.
But you're nice.

I don't know, I don't completely agree with your analysis.
The criticism of "non-places" is strong and evident; in fact, the couple refuses to plan a life together in a place like that from the very first moment. It reiterates the concept when she says she feels disgust toward the "perfect" clouds, so perfect that they leave no room for imagination.
I think you underestimated the role of the cuckoo and what she says at the beginning of the film: "it's nature." Nature is also what prevents you from stepping outside the pre-packaged patterns of a dead-end suburban neighborhood... The film is undoubtedly interesting and lends itself to various interpretations.
I didn't think it would end so tragically; thinking about it, it's actually very realistic.

You've already heard it from others, and I didn’t want to be the one to start.
It's hard to even tell which side you're on... it's up to you.

I'm feeling it, it's pleasant even though it doesn't have anything revolutionary. I have the name of the group they seem to be inspired by on the tip of my tongue...

however, it is not a "novelty"

This film is simply annoying. It may be well made, but I certainly can't say it's good; all I saw were stereotypes. She has the same expressiveness as a mullet, and the character she plays is so dumb that it leaves you disarmed. The shots of the city and the desert, on the other hand, are really beautiful. I'll give it a two to balance the other ratings.