giustiziere Banned

exactly, the strat sings! not the slide! p.s: the link confirms my post, even if we’re not talking about stratocaster there. ajò!

What I would give to be in the mind of sfascia carrozze even just for 5 minutes and find out what he thinks, how he perceives music... as usual, I'm speaking from traumatic post-sample experience.

Franci, Rory wasn’t using a special guitar but was practically using the slide continuously on a normal Fender Stratocaster. The term slide guitar refers to a way of playing, you fool. Understand? The slide that sings... :''-))

you are truly the dumbest stupid girl I have ever had to deal with. 1) little head that you are, don’t turn the tables: your grasp of syntax is pathetic. what you wrote is true, but thanks for that, vocabulary in hand, eh? I pointed out to you that, in my opinion, the review was too "pompous," too many big words, "overwrought," as you would say; and in response, what do you say? "oh, just because I respected the syntax..." o_O but then you see, you don’t understand what’s written in the dictionaries? -"correct arrangement of the parts of a sentence"- yes, exactly: I never doubted it! I "accused" you of writing in an "exaggerated" manner, what the hell does syntax have to do with it? at that point, I started to doubt whether you understood the meaning of that word. now, you know what it means but you use it out of context. is that clear? 2) regarding rhetoric, you dug your own grave (no frank relationship): those who write in a rhetorical manner take pleasure in grandiose sentences and lack a sense of sobriety in speaking (just read comment 314, for example - ooTERRYoo even pointed it out to you humorously). the review is no different: rhetoric to the point of nausea as it’s too ornate, and you said so yourself, without realizing it - "artificial language code" EH? 3) here I give you a mega quote from wiki "A poem does not have a necessarily and truly completed meaning like a piece of prose, or, rather, the meaning is only a part of the communication that occurs when reading or listening to poetry; the other part is not verbal, but emotional. Since language in poetry has this dual function of carrying both meaning and sound, both informative and emotional content, syntax and spelling may vary (the so-called poetic licenses) if this is useful for the overall communication." realize that you are ignorant. do you think, for example, that Ungaretti’s poems follow any phantom rule? you are talking about poetry, about emotions, not about the Pythagorean theorem. the only true "rule" is that a poem is written in verses. for everything else, leave the rules to mathematics, silly. or to grammar... but not to poetry.

ashanti I still don't understand why I should be "bugged"... the term you used has nothing to do with the situation. You're embarrassing, really.

has my full support.

I would have an anecdote to roast you, but I'll pass. P.S: the grade could have been a solid 3, but the first paragraph is really boring.

valeriorivoli rules, there’s not much to argue about. @gustavo: leave it alone, from the sour girl [cit.] you won't even get a shred of explanation: I speak from experience.

"editors" that gives ratings? If my intuition is working as usual, then chaos is a new editor.

Ah, I was right after all. Anyway, cool, one gets thrown in prison, thinks he has found his "kindred spirits," but they not only show him that their "ideology" is just a pretext to be violent and to do business, but on top of that, they also do him a nice "service": doesn’t that seem enough to understand his change? Not to mention the fact that he manages to bond in some way with a Black man, who is in prison for an injustice, unlike him.